• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Would sharks and T Rex buried together lean toward the flood?

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
I’m sure there is a human somewhere buried next to a T-Rex....
I think all the prof you need of the flood - is the Grand Canyon -
that was created by water - no doubt
and a ton of water, all at one time- no doubt.
And now it’s back to normal..... No Doubt!
Yes, but the Grand Canyon could not have been made by the flood. That is obvious. Flood believers cannot explain meanders. Or the fact that some of the sedimentary beds that they claim were laid down in the flood were aeolian. And that most took many millions of years to deposit. The Flood myth was debunked long before Darwin came along.
 

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
I’m sure there is a human somewhere buried next to a T-Rex....

Why are you sure of this?
People have been looking for such evidence for awhile, and haven't ever found any.

They're reduced to pointing out shark teeth found with T-Rex fossils, as though that's important.
Tom
 

Audie

Veteran Member
I’m sure there is a human somewhere buried next to a T-Rex....
I think all the prof you need of the flood - is the Grand Canyon -
that was created by water - no doubt
and a ton of water, all at one time- no doubt.
And now it’s back to normal..... No Doubt!

is this parody or are you serous?
 

Lee Hays

Member
Lotta big talk, pal, but not one actual factual
can you show.

Do you want me to post a picture of the Grand Canyon?
And I said - I’m sure there’s a human buried next to a T-Rex - that doesn’t mean I’m sure of it chick.
 

Lee Hays

Member
Do you want me to post a picture of the Grand Canyon?
And I said - I’m sure there’s a human buried next to a T-Rex - that doesn’t mean I’m sure of it chick.

Besides - I thought the original post read ...
“What do you think”

Are you saying I’m not allowed to comment my thoughts? Unless I have prof?
 

Lee Hays

Member
Why are you sure of this?
People have been looking for such evidence for awhile, and haven't ever found any.

They're reduced to pointing out shark teeth found with T-Rex fossils, as though that's important.
Tom
Sorry - I meant I would think there is a human (somewhere)
 

Lee Hays

Member
Do you want me to post a picture of the Grand Canyon?
And I said - I’m sure there’s a human buried next to a T-Rex - that doesn’t mean I’m sure of it chick.
Sorry I had a typo - not “sure”
But the adage “I’m sure”

I’ll hang on your every post for a mistake on your thoughts too
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Sorry - I meant I would think there is a human (somewhere)
Why would you think that? The last T-rex died out about 65 million years ago. Man did not even make an appearance until about 2 million years ago.

It appears that you believe the Flood myth. Perhaps we should work on that first before we work on evolution.
 

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
Sorry - I meant I would think there is a human (somewhere)
But you know what?

Creationists have been trying their best for a long time to find evidence that their beliefs are true.
But they haven't done it yet. The best thing they can do is point out ambiguities in the fossil record, and ignore the solid evidence that is all around.
Tom
 

Lee Hays

Member
Why would you think that? The last T-rex died out about 65 million years ago. Man did not even make an appearance until about 2 million years ago.

It appears that you believe the Flood myth. Perhaps we should work on that first before we work on evolution.
Ok cool

Help me understand please!
I’m not kidding - I want to understand.
If you know for sure - share your in-site!

One mans trash is another treasure.
Myths are debunked daily, and truths are labeled as myths more often
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Ok cool

Help me understand please!
I’m not kidding - I want to understand.
If you know for sure - share your in-site!

One mans trash is another treasure.
Myths are debunked daily, and truths are labeled as myths more often

Do you have any education in the sciences? Let's start off with how streams erode the landscape. Streams have three general "ages". The first, the youthful stage is river that is moving fairly rapidly. These are found in areas of high relief, in other words steep slopes. The river will cut a fairly straight line. Fast flow in a river means straight lines. As the slope lessens and the stream will enter its mature stage. U shaped valleys with minimal turning. As the slope lessens even more and the river slows it will form meanders. Meanders are the "old age" of streams. The river slowly erodes the landscape with oxbows forming and sometimes cutting themselves off.

https://sswm.info/sites/default/files/reference_attachments/IMMOR 2006 Classification Rivers.pdf

If one has a steep gradient and a high load of sediment one can get braided streams, those can form in rapidly moving water, but they have no true meanders. Often creationists mistake one for the other but one can see the difference. Braided stream:


220px-Waimakariri01_gobeirne.jpg


Meander:

220px-Rio-cauto-cuba.JPG


Sometimes a meander is established and either sea level drops or the land is raised. Here is a tributary to the Colorado that flood believers cannot explain:


600px-2009-08-20-01800_USA_Utah_316_Goosenecks_SP.jpg


That could not have formed in a flood and I will be happy to go over with you why that is the case.
 
Top