• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Strangest religions

sooda

Veteran Member
JW is pretty strange. Claims to be historical Christianity but clearly isn't.

They evolved from the Millerites.

Millerism - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millerites
Like the previous date, April 18 passed without Christ's return. More study led the Millerites to believe that they had entered the "tarrying time"—a time of waiting after which Christ would finally return. This belief sustained the Millerites through the months of May to July 1844. As Knight notes however, this period represented a "flatness ...
 

Samael_Khan

Goosebender
There is theory behind it?

But yeah, as for what is weird, I grew up around
temples with all sorts of dragons, which look odd
to outsiders.

I should say "maybe I understand the theory" rather than "understand the theory".

God is a creator who creates the world the way he wants it. He gives man the choice to do what he requires of man. Man willfully disobeys Gods requirements of him and therefore becomes a faulty creation (the faulty part is called sin). God can either leave him be, destroy him (and he has the right since he owns man) or he can fix man. God wants man to be fixed since he still loves that creation. Problem is that he set a law in place saying that man must be destroyed if he becomes faulty and God cannot disobey the laws he creates because of his uncompromising standards. So in order for man to be fixed, he has to use a loophole in his law in order to prevent the destruction law to have an affect on man. The way he does this is that he sends a faultless man, who cannot be destroyed according to his law, and who has to agree to being destroyed (God actually cannot destroy him even if he wished because of his law that he created), to die for the rest. This means that this faultless man then had bought the the faultless men by paying the price for their faults, and thereby owns them. So Jesus dying for man is a transaction, it isn't arbitrary, which is why he says that he dies as a ransom. Because he then owns them, he rules as king over them. And since he paid for their destruction they can now be made perfect as they don't have to be destroyed anymore. Now God also can fix them.

I have a nagging feeling that my above explanations has holes and inconsistencies...

A for your temples with dragons, I think that these days many people would probably jump for joy at seeing that. I would. Dragons are awesome!
 

Audie

Veteran Member
I should say "maybe I understand the theory" rather than "understand the theory".

God is a creator who creates the world the way he wants it. He gives man the choice to do what he requires of man. Man willfully disobeys Gods requirements of him and therefore becomes a faulty creation (the faulty part is called sin). God can either leave him be, destroy him (and he has the right since he owns man) or he can fix man. God wants man to be fixed since he still loves that creation. Problem is that he set a law in place saying that man must be destroyed if he becomes faulty and God cannot disobey the laws he creates because of his uncompromising standards. So in order for man to be fixed, he has to use a loophole in his law in order to prevent the destruction law to have an affect on man. The way he does this is that he sends a faultless man, who cannot be destroyed according to his law, and who has to agree to being destroyed (God actually cannot destroy him even if he wished because of his law that he created), to die for the rest. This means that this faultless man then had bought the the faultless men by paying the price for their faults, and thereby owns them. So Jesus dying for man is a transaction, it isn't arbitrary, which is why he says that he dies as a ransom. Because he then owns them, he rules as king over them. And since he paid for their destruction they can now be made perfect as they don't have to be destroyed anymore. Now God also can fix them.

I have a nagging feeling that my above explanations has holes and inconsistencies...

A for your temples with dragons, I think that these days many people would probably jump for joy at seeing that. I would. Dragons are awesome!

I like chinese dragons, and enjoy the renditions of them.
So much a part of my childhood!

As for theory, I do know the story and you told it well
enough. I was thinking of the word "theory" in a way
much more in line with that which goes with the career
in science that I was at one time pursuing.
 

Samael_Khan

Goosebender
I like chinese dragons, and enjoy the renditions of them.
So much a part of my childhood!

As for theory, I do know the story and you told it well
enough. I was thinking of the word "theory" in a way
much more in line with that which goes with the career
in science that I was at one time pursuing.

I envy your childhood :D

Regarding the science aspect of theory, a man dying for ones sins is a legalistic matter and not a scientific one. Regarding sin itself, that has to do with psychology and genetics. Because of the influences of ones parents and their surroundings a person would end up doing something perceived as a sin. A person can also inherit genetic traits that make them more prone to acting out on their anger, which is a sin, and our sexuality makes sexual sins easier to commit than others.
 

Audie

Veteran Member
IRegarding the science aspect of theory, a man dying for ones sins is a legalistic matter and not a scientific one. Regarding sin itself, that has to do with psychology and genetics. Because of the influences of ones parents and their surroundings a person would end up doing something perceived as a sin. A person can also inherit genetic traits that make them more prone to acting out on their anger, which is a sin, and our sexuality makes sexual sins easier to commit than others.

In theory, yes, but also in theory, no.
 

Samantha Rinne

Resident Genderfluid Writer/Artist
Personally?

Twelve Tribes cult.

Followed by Unity church. They're the A Course In Miracles guys.

You guys are boring me. You're just using this to make fun of Christians, and not actually finding any weird religions. Tenrikyo is one of the weirder religions. Someone was basically assigned to take over, and she named herself the chosen one or something. As are some of the Indian religions besides Hinduism. Jainism has sky clad practitioners and advocates nonviolence sometimes to the point of death (extreme fasting). And one of those religions has a tower where ppl get eaten by crows when they die.
 
Last edited:

IndigoChild5559

Loving God and my neighbor as myself.
What is the strangest religion you ever came across/ learned about?

A few years ago the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster managed to be legally recognized in New Zealand, to the point that Pastafarian representatives are authorized to officiate weddings. I understand liking pasta, but that's a a bit too much.:rolleyes:
It's ridiculous that Pastafarianism was recognized, since it doesn't have a single sincere believer.

But at any rate, I'll mention two interesting religions I've come across.

The first is a relatively new religion call Yi-Guan Dao (also called Tian Dao). It is currently the second largest religion in Taiwan. It is a syncretistic religion, built upon the base of Ch'an (Zen) Buddhism but incorporating items from other world religions. Some of their alters have not only the Immortals and Buddhas, but also Jesus, Mary, and Joseph. The believe that all religions see some of the truth, as in the story of the blind men and the elephant. They believe they themselves are not a religion, but that they transcend religion.

They have incorporated certain elements of monotheism. For example, "Tao" can be understood either as an impersonal source or as a personal God. The central invocation of their altar is a flame for the presence of God.

However, in other ways they are still stuck in a superstitious folk religion. For example, they practice the channeling of the Buddha Gigong (aka possession) and automatic sand writing for divination.

Interestingly, they have moved their headquarters to California with the intention of propagating Tao to the English speaking world, but are failing to do so, largely because they do not understand that their religion is 95% Chinese culture and language, and would need to assimilate American culture to have appeal.


The second really strange religious experience I had was with an actual cult -- I literally had to walk out on it. I was at that time doing research into the Eastern Orthodox church (EO is responsible for the progroms, and I wanted to understand it better). A friend of mine said he had seen an American Orthodox Church on a particular street. Such a church would have been new and rare. I decided to show up incognito.

The first sign that things were... "off," was that the men were wearing kippot and tallitot (the skull caps and prayer shawls that Jews wear). The Divine Liturgy seemed as normal as I could tell (not that I know much about Divine Liturgy, but for example, it didn't invoke Satan or anything, lol).

It was some kind of special day for them, because they had a lot of refreshments after that particular service. It gave me a chance to talk to a couple for a while. Apparently they had originally been a Pentecostal church, and had gone through a mass conversion to Orthodoxy, but had then left that church as well. Why? The head priest had written a book. Not just any book, mind you, but a book "revealed to him by the holy spirit," much of it about sexuality. This hadn't sat well with the Orthodox Bishop. This church treated this book as being on par with the Bible. Kind of like their own little special Bible Part 2.

Well, I wanted to talk to the priest about this, since I found it fascinating. But when I had the chance, he found my questions to be undermining of his absolute authority. The way he talked down to me in an angry domineering voice that implied "no one dare question me," gave me the willies. I looked around, and no one seemed to think anything was out of order. I turned around and left.


Oh, I really should mention a third experience. Not because it was weird, but just because it was unusual. I had been studying Lakota spirituality, and was invited to a women's sweat. There is something intrinsically spiritual about being in the dark of the lodge, with glowing coals as the only light, air heavy with steam, silence occasionally broken by song. For a time you think deeply. And then for a time you do not think at all, but just be. It is not an ordinary time, or an ordinary place, and so you do not have ordinary thoughts. You are close to yourself, close to earth, and close to the Creator. If you ever have a chance, do it.
 

ajay0

Well-Known Member
Jainism has sky clad practitioners and advocates nonviolence sometimes to the point of death (extreme fasting).

Male jain monks of the Digambhara sect are sky clad practicioners and nude totally. Not the householders.

They do not wear clothes as per their religious instructions but this is meant only for male monks. Let's not forget that it is only the human being who wears clothes and not any other animal, bird or fish.

Also there is no link between nonviolence and fasting to the point of death. These are two different themes.

The Jains and Hindus, believe that in the event of extreme illness, old age where one is weak to the point of not being able to care for oneself properly , there is nothing wrong in giving up the body provided it is done by fasting to the point of death. It is also considered spiritually meritorious due to the austerity contained in the practice of fasting.This is seen as voluntary euthanasia in the western world.

The practice is called santhara or sallekhana.

Sallekhana - Wikipedia

And one of those religions has a tower where ppl get eaten by crows when they die.

This is zoroastrianism.

The dead are put in a tower like place where the dead are eaten by vultures. There is no cremation or burial which would imply loss of trees or wood, loss of ground and so on.
 
Top