and its name calling which is against the rules. You disrespectfully call me that again and I will report you. Your rude way of speaking to people shows you to not be a true Christian, you are deceived.
I'll repeat what i said earlier:
"So avoid the topic, and ridicule me, or promote narratives about me, personally, as if that provides reason for your arguments. Don't take it personally, if i don't take these hostile outbursts personally. I find them vapidly amusing, and see them as tactics for defeated debaters, who have no arguments, facts, or reason for their beliefs, and must rely on fallacies."
the very best minds have employed the very best techniques, and this is what they have discovered — church legend notwithstanding.
So, contemporary revisionist history is what you choose to believe, instead of millennia of scholarship, corroborating writers, and historical tradition..
See above. “Error” apparently consists of “Stuff Usfan Doesn’t Believe In and Doesn’t Match the ‘Appropriate’ Ideology.”
Dismiss my call for evidence, if you wish. That does not improve your arguments, nor support the list of false accusations.
Fear will make a person react in odd ways. Your posts offer evidence of such odd reactionism.
oh, good. There hasn't been any psychobabble analysis of me in several posts. This evidences your arguments?
/shakes head/
Paul certainly had no intentions like that.
Romans9:1I speak the truth in Christ—I am not lying, my conscience confirms it through the Holy Spirit— 2I have great sorrow and unceasing anguish in my heart.
3For I could wish that I myself were cursed and cut off from Christ for the sake of my people, those of my own race, 4the people of Israel.
There are computer programs that can sort out different authors by their style.
Seriously? This supercedes the historical and traditional consensus of the authors?
All that fundies need is a VENEER of scholarship to resolve their cognitive dissonance.
Groupthink loyalty, much? This is evidence of 'error!', in the biblical texts?
Or are you adding to the list of false narratives?
I had that one, already:
12. Christians cannot reason or follow science, as they are blinded by their superstitions.
..but it helps to rephrase things, for clarity.
"Cognitive dissonance!!", is a great psychobabble term, and demeans your debating opponents very well. Who needs facts or arguments, when you can dismiss people with groupthink smears!?!
My NIV Bible says, about the authorship of Matthew, "The early church fathers were unanimous in holding that Matthew, one of the twelve disciples, was its author."
Maybe they misread, and thought 'unanimous', was 'anonymous!'