• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

A Flood of Nonsense

sooda

Veteran Member
In Sumer of Abraham's supposed time the earth was where the sky met the horizon.
I should have qualified this a little better - we know of no Middle East wide flood, nor any
European wide flood. And certainly, Noah didn't come to Australia to collect kangaroos.

Best explanation I have seen. "In Sumer of Abraham's supposed time the earth was where the sky met the horizon.".
 

Native

Free Natural Philosopher & Comparative Mythologist
. . . but I think the Flood story in Genesis comes from Sumer and is based on spring floods in the Euphrates river basin.
Have you thought of the time implications of this? Is the Sumer culture just as old as the story of Creation?
 

sooda

Veteran Member
Have you thought of the time implications of this? Is the Sumer culture just as old as the story of Creation?

Older.. in Sumer they were practicing irrigation and organized agriculture while Yahweh was busy in the garden of Eden.
 

Native

Free Natural Philosopher & Comparative Mythologist
Older.. in Sumer they were practicing irrigation and organized agriculture while Yahweh was busy in the garden of Eden.
So you think the Sumerian culture existed "while (or even before) Yahweh was busy" creating the Eden in six days?
 
Last edited:

ecco

Veteran Member
How is showing that parts of the Bible to be mythological "attacking the Bible" ? This is a claim of fundamentalists that makes no sense.

I have to disagree with you on this. The people who wrote the OT put together stories and oral traditions passed down from generation to generation. These stories were an oral history and were accepted as truth, not as myth or allegory.

Asserting that some parts are allegory, as even many Jews and Christians do, is attacking the Bible.
 

exchemist

Veteran Member
I agree that it would be traumatic and memorable, but I think the Flood story in Genesis comes from Sumer and is based on spring floods in the Euphrates river basin.

There is a lot of evidence that many firsts like irrigation and sail boats came from Mesopotamia.
Yes I think that is the origin usually quoted.

But I find this is a rather intriguing alternative idea. I did not imagine that effects of sea level rise after the ice age could be so dramatic.
 

sooda

Veteran Member
Yes I think that is the origin usually quoted.

But I find this is a rather intriguing alternative idea. I did not imagine that effects of sea level rise after the ice age could be so dramatic.

Well, China, Anatolia, the Arabian peninsula, the British Isles and elsewhere have no flood footprint... neither does Egypt or Afghanistan or the rest of Mesopotamia.

The retreat of the glaciers was quite slow over millions of years.. That raised sea levels a bit but caused the desertification of Arabia and the Sahara.

The flood story is teaching narrative.. like Aesop's Fables. Its for children. Adults should be more concerned with the message than the fairy tale.
 

sooda

Veteran Member
I have to disagree with you on this. The people who wrote the OT put together stories and oral traditions passed down from generation to generation. These stories were an oral history and were accepted as truth, not as myth or allegory.

Asserting that some parts are allegory, as even many Jews and Christians do, is attacking the Bible.

No they weren't accepted as truth.. Even in the 2nd century BC the Jews knew the Jonah story was teaching narrative. Oral "transmission" is common in illiterate populations but its still teaching narrative.

Jesus said, "my father's house has many mansions".. You think that's literal?

The Koran has over 30 descriptions of heaven.. all are allegory.

Think about this.. Jesus taught in parables.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
I have to disagree with you on this. The people who wrote the OT put together stories and oral traditions passed down from generation to generation. These stories were an oral history and were accepted as truth, not as myth or allegory.

Asserting that some parts are allegory, as even many Jews and Christians do, is attacking the Bible.
I agree with that too. I am trying to work from a Christian perspective. As a Christian if one demands that the Bible is inspired then there has to be a reason that its stories can be excused for . Like in most cases the simplest explanation is best, the writers of it followed oral traditions and myths of the time and wrote them as if they were history and believed them. Just as the writers of any other holy book believed their myths.
 

exchemist

Veteran Member
I agree with that too. I am trying to work from a Christian perspective. As a Christian if one demands that the Bible is inspired then there has to be a reason that its stories can be excused for . Like in most cases the simplest explanation is best, the writers of it followed oral traditions and myths of the time and wrote them as if they were history and believed them. Just as the writers of any other holy book believed their myths.
How do you think the Greeks regarded what we call the Greek myths?
 

ecco

Veteran Member
The flood story is teaching narrative.. like Aesop's Fables. Its for children.
What's the basis for your comment? Even today, many people accept Genesis as fact. Six thousand years ago, few would have questioned it. There was no other viable alternative. The oral stories that eventually were inscribed were around for thousands of years in some form or another. These stories were history for the people of the times.
 

sooda

Veteran Member
What's the basis for your comment? Even today, many people accept Genesis as fact. Six thousand years ago, few would have questioned it. There was no other viable alternative. The oral stories that eventually were inscribed were around for thousands of years in some form or another. These stories were history for the people of the times.

I suppose they do.. There are lots of flood stories and creation myths around the world.

Genesis of Genesis: Where Did the Biblical Story of Creation Come From?
 

sooda

Veteran Member
As truth. At least insofar as their gods and the stories about their gods.

Some Greeks.. certainly not all.


Did the Greeks really believe in their gods? : AskHistorians
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/17...
Not to the extent that modern religions believe in their gods. Ancient Greeks believed in the existence of the Olympian pantheon, but also acknowledged that there were other gods in other pantheons, as well as making comparisons between their own gods and others.
 

sooda

Veteran Member
I am not sure. There were probably many that believes them. Currently I am trying to move our science deniers along with baby steps.


By definition, a historian is a scientist. Herodotus is generally considered the "father of history" and he distinguishes myths from historical facts, or at least tries to. At least the gods to not interfere in his history directly (except by pronouncements of the oracles which in his and in the later Greek accounts are always relevant, but this is not related to the myths). Homer is not considered a historian, of course, and was not considered one by the Greeks.

So the short answer is that Greek historians always distinguished myths from historical facts.
 
Top