• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

How Youtube caters to Pedophiles

Lyndon

"Peace is the answer" quote: GOD, 2014
Premium Member
Rival I start a thread that's up to 121 posts and its not picked up as a featured thread, why is that, discrimination???
 

Rival

se Dex me saut.
Staff member
Premium Member
Lyndon may not be somebody, but the people who write the DMS-5 and the ICD-11 are certainly well-qualified. I can't believe you're actually implying that fantasizing about having sex with children is healthy.
But what you're essentially saying here is that people, anyone, with what people consider unhealthy fantasies should never have those fantasies. This is going to be an absolute hell for those people. A fantasy is that person's only outlet, only legal outlet, for their sexual desires and it would be madness to take that away from them. Repression is not a good thing and as all psychologists know, can have terrible consequences; it can lead to violence, rape, murder and all sorts of crazy nasty things. To deny people their fantasies would be tantamount to the worst repression possible and eventually lead to a worse outcome than you were originally trying to stop. These people have no legal outlet for their sexual desires whatsoever if we were to follow your line of thought and that can only ever end badly. A sexual fantasy is one of a person's most intimate outlets and I am not one for saying what should and should not go on in a person's head.
 

Rival

se Dex me saut.
Staff member
Premium Member
Rival I start a thread that's up to 121 posts and its not picked up as a featured thread, why is that, discrimination???
I believe it depends upon which forum the thread is posted in as to whether it can become featured. Staff don't pick featured threads but we can unfeature.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
And I keep telling you that paedophilia isn't an act, it's a sexual desire. Just like being straight isn't an act, but a sexual desire for the opposite sex. If you are arguing against people who rape children then I'm with you. Anyone who rapes anyone else should be locked up.
I might be considered a mass murderer on certain days in rush hour standard if that criterion was held to.

What drives me nuts is the opposition to an activity, anime videos, that could lower incidences just as regular porn lowers rape. Yes, it is creepy and ooky by most of our standards. We don't have to watch those videos. But those videos are far preferred to actual children being molested.
 

Shiranui117

Pronounced Shee-ra-noo-ee
Premium Member
But what you're essentially saying here is that people, anyone, with what people consider unhealthy fantasies should never have those fantasies.
Yes. We don't encourage people to act on their mental disorders. We help them to manage and mitigate the symptoms, not to act on them. People have fantasies about suicide too, but we most certainly don't encourage that and we refer people to help networks whenever those fantasies or ideations come up.

This is going to be an absolute hell for those people. A fantasy is that person's only outlet, only legal outlet, for their sexual desires and it would be madness to take that away from them. Repression is not a good thing and as all psychologists know, can have terrible consequences; it can lead to violence, rape, murder and all sorts of crazy nasty things. To deny people their fantasies would be tantamount to the worst repression possible and eventually lead to a worse outcome that you were originally try to stop. These people have no legal outlet for their sexual desires whatsoever if we were to follow your line of thought and that can only ever end badly. A sexual fantasy is one of a person's most intimate outlets and I am not one for saying what should and should not go on in a person's head.
The medical community says what should and should not go on in a person's head all the time. It's the reason classifications for mental disorders exist. If you're fantasizing about having sex with prepubescent children, there's something deeply wrong with you and you need help. (General "you" of course.) Pedophiles are commonly prescribed medication that lowers their sex drive. If we don't have a cure for pedophilia, then we can at least do our best to inhibit their sex drive as much as possible and teach them how to manage the symptoms of their disorder. We can give them support networks to lead healthy lives despite their conditions. Just because their whacking it to videos of kids on YouTube is legal doesn't mean we should encourage it or say it's okay. Alcoholism is perfectly legal, but we don't just keep rationing bottles of beer to alcoholics because drinking alcohol is legal.
 

Lyndon

"Peace is the answer" quote: GOD, 2014
Premium Member
I believe it depends upon which forum the thread is posted in as to whether it can become featured. Staff don't pick featured threads but we can unfeature.

Sorry but there can be no possible reason a thread in Morals and Ethics category is not eligible for featured status, try again!!
 

Rival

se Dex me saut.
Staff member
Premium Member
Yes. We don't encourage people to act on their mental disorders. We help them to manage and mitigate the symptoms, not to act on them. People have fantasies about suicide too, but we most certainly don't encourage that and we refer people to help networks whenever those fantasies or ideations come up.

The medical community says what should and should not go on in a person's head all the time. It's the reason classifications for mental disorders exist. If you're fantasizing about having sex with prepubescent children, there's something deeply wrong with you and you need help. (General "you" of course.) Pedophiles are commonly prescribed medication that lowers their sex drive. If we don't have a cure for pedophilia, then we can at least do our best to inhibit their sex drive as much as possible and teach them how to manage the symptoms of their disorder. We can give them support networks to lead healthy lives despite their conditions. Just because their whacking it to videos of kids on YouTube is legal doesn't mean we should encourage it or say it's okay. Alcoholism is perfectly legal, but we don't just keep rationing bottles of beer to alcoholics because drinking alcohol is legal.
I can see where you are coming from, but we are on different wavelengths here. I'm of the opinion it would be better to give them a healthy outlet instead of repressing their drive altogether. Also, I'm not sure if sex-drive reducing drugs work all that well on women but I could well be wrong.
 

Rival

se Dex me saut.
Staff member
Premium Member
Sorry but there can be no possible reason a thread in Morals and Ethics category is not eligible for featured status, try again!!
Are you now complaining because your thread isn't featured? You'll have to take that up with the software.
 

Dan From Smithville

What we've got here is failure to communicate.
Staff member
Premium Member
Watching videos of kids in bathing suits, trunks, or whatever else on YouTube isn't illegal. People can't just assume someone's intention in watching videos. Nevertheless, paedophiles watch videos of kids on YouTube - who is surprised? What is the offence? I guess soon zoophiles are going to be targeted for watching videos of huskies. If it were on RedTube, sure, be concerned.
I had to look RedTube up. Oh my. There were not huskies on there. No rabbits either.
 

Shiranui117

Pronounced Shee-ra-noo-ee
Premium Member
I can see where you are coming from, but we are on different wavelengths here. I'm of the opinion it would be better to give them a healthy outlet instead of repressing their drive altogether. Also, I'm not sure if sex-drive reducing drugs work all that well on women but I could well be wrong.
They have that outlet already; there's no law about getting off to almost anything you want to which isn't already banned by law (zoophilia, child pornography, etc.). My thing is getting them to not need to resort to that outlet in the first place.

And yeah, no clue on sex-drive reducing drugs. I just use People of Walmart as needed.
 

Rival

se Dex me saut.
Staff member
Premium Member
We seem to have lost the thrust of the thread, but in short: no, I don't think YouTube is an online paedophile mafia; I think their algorithms could do with being better. I don't believe this is purposeful.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
So now we're defending pedophilia, I just can't believe this!!
Every proverbial grandma with gray hair and blue cat eye glasses with a dangling gold chain that ever watched peoples children's gawd awful home movies and commented about how darling they are , happen to be pedos?

I mean thats likely the largest demographic of people who ever watch those videos.
 
Top