exhibited publicly. The interior of the womb is a hallowed and private place for human life to begin.
It is disrespectful to the privacy of unborn children to show images publically as by the media.
Ultrasound tech might be OK for doctors to treat women great with child in private settings.
If God had wanted the whole world to view unborn babies, he would have made Eve with a window in her belly.
Its an interesting mental exercise to ask if its the fetus's womb or the mother's, but its not going to persuade the anti-abortion movement to rationally compromise. Its a movement that demonizes all opposition.
There is a parable about a contest between the wind and the sun to see who can get a man to remove his jacket. The winds blows hard, but the man only tightens his jacket in response. The sun shines on him warmly, and he takes it off for himself. The sun wins the contest.
Similarly have you ever heard the story of William Wilberforce? He petitions his English monarch and representatives to end the slave trade, but they won't do it. He goes to the public, and the public won't do it. No one supports him except for a fraction. He does get some sympathy from some mp's and some of the populace, and they form a plan. They slip in an addendum which de funds sugar. Suddenly with no reason to buy slaves, the government gives in and slavery is abolished.
This issue will not be settled with direct argument and face to face contests. You have to take away the money from those benefiting. Only then can reason determine a reasonable outcome. The anti-abortion and the pro-choice must both support election reform, or nothing will change. The issue will remain hot, just as it has for 40 years. It will continue to be so for the next 100.