"Trump is abusing his power to declassify information and wielding it as a weapon in his ongoing war against the U.S. intelligence community."
'Unprecedented': Trump weaponizes FBI documents to sabotage Russia probe
this is now the talking point that Trump is weaponizing documents whereas the question also remains on whether the previous administration weaponized intelligence against Trump.
Whatever happened to "Let's find out the truth"?
Or is it that the truth will put people in hot water and therefore they are creating another false theory like collusion?
"In testimony, former FBI Director James Comey says that prior to signing a FISA application to obtain a warrant to conduct surveillance on Carter Page, a former adviser to President Trump’s 2016 campaign, Comey was aware that the dossier authored by former British spy Christopher Steele was financed by Democrats who opposed President Donald Trump.
Yet according to Democratic and Republican House Intelligence memos, that information was not specifically included in the FISA application, which in part relied on Steele’s work to obtain warrants to monitor Page. "
James Comey Admits He Knew Democrats Financed 'Pee' Dossier
Was there a reason why they didn't include it? Was there collusion here?
"Former Attorney General Loretta Lynch accused former FBI Director James Comey of mischaracterizing her statements under oath by repeatedly alleging she instructed him to call the Hillary Clinton email probe a “matter” instead of an “investigation.”
Transcripts: Loretta Lynch Accused James Comey of Lying Under Oath | People's Pundit Daily
For example, Comey and Brennan are at each others throats over who pushed the dossier.
James Comey Admits He Knew Democrats Financed 'Pee' Dossier
Is this where those who plotted begin to unravel themselves against each other for safety sake? Or is it a one time only mistake?
Personally, I want to know who is lying about weaponizing departments. It's time we really get to the bottom of this. I'm glad for those who were prosecuted in the investigation but It certainly looks like they were only looking at those in the Republican party and not giving a full report which should have included both parties. IMO.
'Unprecedented': Trump weaponizes FBI documents to sabotage Russia probe
this is now the talking point that Trump is weaponizing documents whereas the question also remains on whether the previous administration weaponized intelligence against Trump.
Whatever happened to "Let's find out the truth"?
Or is it that the truth will put people in hot water and therefore they are creating another false theory like collusion?
"In testimony, former FBI Director James Comey says that prior to signing a FISA application to obtain a warrant to conduct surveillance on Carter Page, a former adviser to President Trump’s 2016 campaign, Comey was aware that the dossier authored by former British spy Christopher Steele was financed by Democrats who opposed President Donald Trump.
Yet according to Democratic and Republican House Intelligence memos, that information was not specifically included in the FISA application, which in part relied on Steele’s work to obtain warrants to monitor Page. "
James Comey Admits He Knew Democrats Financed 'Pee' Dossier
Was there a reason why they didn't include it? Was there collusion here?
"Former Attorney General Loretta Lynch accused former FBI Director James Comey of mischaracterizing her statements under oath by repeatedly alleging she instructed him to call the Hillary Clinton email probe a “matter” instead of an “investigation.”
Transcripts: Loretta Lynch Accused James Comey of Lying Under Oath | People's Pundit Daily
For example, Comey and Brennan are at each others throats over who pushed the dossier.
James Comey Admits He Knew Democrats Financed 'Pee' Dossier
Is this where those who plotted begin to unravel themselves against each other for safety sake? Or is it a one time only mistake?
Personally, I want to know who is lying about weaponizing departments. It's time we really get to the bottom of this. I'm glad for those who were prosecuted in the investigation but It certainly looks like they were only looking at those in the Republican party and not giving a full report which should have included both parties. IMO.