• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Should Women's Homeless Shelters Ban Trans Identified Males?

Should Women's Shelters Ban Trans Identified Males?

  • Yes

    Votes: 4 19.0%
  • No

    Votes: 12 57.1%
  • Other/Undecided

    Votes: 5 23.8%

  • Total voters
    21

ImmortalFlame

Woke gremlin
If they have penises, they are male.
So you have no idea about the difference between biological sex and gender?

Psychological issues aside, they are male.
That's like saying "aside from the fact that this is a structure built of bricks with four walls, a floor and a ceiling, it isn't a building".

If their presence in a woman's shelter is based solely upon what they SAY they are, that is a problem....a big one.
Actually, there really isn't. This is literally the way bathrooms have always operated. They don't have "genital scanners" to check the genitals of everyone who comes in.

And it's one I, were I running a woman's shelter, wouldn't deal with. A transgender (male to female) who can't produce medical proof that s/he is well along the process of a 'gender change,' isn't going to...and shouldn't be allowed access to...a woman's shelter. The same goes vice versa, of course.
And why not? What studies or actual concrete evidence can you give of the harm caused by admitting pre-op trans people into shelters?

IMO, of course. I believe that the women who are seeking shelter and protection from men who have abused them need the help more than the guy who just SAYS 'but I'm a woman!"
Except that "guy" is actually a woman, and is also coming to seek shelter and protection from having been abused.

If he's not on hormones with a planned surgery schedule? Not a chance in hades.
And you have yet to provide a single justification for this position.
 

Koldo

Outstanding Member
And isn't that exactly what the bill proposed in the OP is intending to do?

Either you completely misunderstood it or I did it. Because what I understood is that shelters will be able to decide who is a woman and who is not. It has nothing to do with forbidding them from accepting transgender. If anything, it gives more power to shelter operators, not less.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Is it more of a problem, though, than transwomen who suffer staggeringly high ratios of violence, being turned away from aid either for their looks, or their papers? What if they're not comfortable being around men? Kind of a catch 22 imo.
I know, and in most cases there would not be a problem. But what is to be done with the rare case where women cannot take the presence of any genetic male? I think that in most cases it would be far better if women's shelters took in trans-females too. But at times a bit of flexibility might be desirable.
 

ImmortalFlame

Woke gremlin
Either you completely misunderstood it or I did it. Because what I understood is that shelters will be able to decide who is a woman and who is not. It has nothing to do with forbidding them from accepting transgender. If anything, it gives more power to shelter operators, not less.
Ah, I was misled by the thread title and poll question.
 

Enoch07

It's all a sick freaking joke.
Premium Member
I've thought more about it weighing everything and seeing other peoples opinions on the matter.

And I've officially changed my vote from not sure/undecided to trans women shouldn't be banned from womens shelters, because it's the right decision to make.

The main concern I had was "What if a predator pretended to be trans in order to obtain admission to the shelter." Well after reflecting on that for a bit I realized. It's a shelter, with many women there. If a predator pretending to be trans got in, and tried to do something. The other women in the room would help, and stop the assault from happening. While that is not 100% safe, it is as close as we can get without discrimination, and without endangering innocent lives (trans included).
 

Kangaroo Feathers

Yea, it is written in the Book of Cyril...
If they have penises, they are male. Psychological issues aside, they are male. If their presence in a woman's shelter is based solely upon what they SAY they are, that is a problem....a big one.


And it's one I, were I running a woman's shelter, wouldn't deal with. A transgender (male to female) who can't produce medical proof that s/he is well along the process of a 'gender change,' isn't going to...and shouldn't be allowed access to...a woman's shelter. The same goes vice versa, of course.

IMO, of course. I believe that the women who are seeking shelter and protection from men who have abused them need the help more than the guy who just SAYS 'but I'm a woman!"

If he's not on hormones with a planned surgery schedule? Not a chance in hades.
You don't think "the guy who just SAYS 'but I'm a woman!'" sometimes end up seeking shelter and protection from men who have abused them? Is their need somehow less?
 

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
And I've officially changed my vote from not sure/undecided to trans women shouldn't be banned from womens shelters, because it's the right decision to make.
How about we let the staff of the shelter decide who to let in and who to keep out?

This whole thing is about requiring staff of homeless shelters to do things they don't think is a good idea. Maybe they know more about the situation than you and your SJW buddies do?
Tom
 

ADigitalArtist

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
I know, and in most cases there would not be a problem. But what is to be done with the rare case where women cannot take the presence of any genetic male? I think that in most cases it would be far better if women's shelters took in trans-females too. But at times a bit of flexibility might be desirable.
What does "take the presence of a genetic male" even mean? And why would this not the case for transwomen? Or a cis woman with another woman? It just seems like transwomen are being unfairly singled out.
 

Enoch07

It's all a sick freaking joke.
Premium Member
How about we let the staff of the shelter decide who to let in and who to keep out?

This whole thing is about requiring staff of homeless shelters to do things they don't think is a good idea. Maybe they know more about the situation than you and your SJW buddies do?

For sure the staff discernment should always be in play.

But you can't have a rule explicitly saying trans woman are banned entirely.

And SJWs are not always wrong about everything. They do tend to be wrong about a lot, mind you :p, but they are right on some issues. That's why its important to listen to the opposition. Not only to understand their arguments better, so that you can better counter those arguments, but hell, you might agree with em every once in awhile.

Hell I even been watching Contrapoints lately on YT. She's a trans female communist intellectual. While I disagree with her on 99% of everything she says, she makes some good points, let's me see how my opposition views my positions from their POV, and she's entertaining. Very dramatic ole Contrapoints she is, good entertainment.

She reminds me of a mutual friend of ours here on RF Tom (not gonna out her you know who).
 
Last edited:

dianaiad

Well-Known Member
So you have no idea about the difference between biological sex and gender?


That's like saying "aside from the fact that this is a structure built of bricks with four walls, a floor and a ceiling, it isn't a building".


Actually, there really isn't. This is literally the way bathrooms have always operated. They don't have "genital scanners" to check the genitals of everyone who comes in.


And why not? What studies or actual concrete evidence can you give of the harm caused by admitting pre-op trans people into shelters?


Except that "guy" is actually a woman, and is also coming to seek shelter and protection from having been abused.


And you have yet to provide a single justification for this position.

It's about the women who come to shelters who are afraid of men, for good reason. Men lie. Men who are stalkers lie. It would not be a bit difficult for a man to come to a shelter and SAY 'but "i'm a woman!" and gain entrance for the purpose of coming after someone.

Is this a little 'out of the realm of possibility?" Not really. Women who must resort to such shelters are dealing with men who will do just about anything.

So...a man who cannot prove that he is properly diagnosed and on a treatment plan to change his physical gender would be, were I in charge, told no. when he can come with the paperwork, ok, but based only on his word?

No.
 

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
For sure the staff discernment should always be in play.
The staff discernment should be the bottom line.

That's what this is all about. People trying to tell the staff of a homeless shelter who they are required to admit.

I don't think that is a good idea. The issues that they have to deal with are huge, and I think it best to let them decide without outsiders telling them what to do.
Tom
 

Stanyon

WWMRD?
In a perfect world everyone would have a safe place to go but reality dictates that someone has to pay the light bill, property taxes, maintain equipment and clean, counseling services, administration etc. Considering all this vs. the very small amount of people it might actually serve, is it worth it and who will pay the bill in the meantime?
Would some local churches, mosques, synagogues, temples etc. oppose helping on religious grounds?
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
People always talk about MtF but never FtM. I imagine women would have an even bigger flipout over transmales entering women's shelters or restrooms despite having been born female.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
What does "take the presence of a genetic male" even mean? And why would this not the case for transwomen? Or a cis woman with another woman? It just seems like transwomen are being unfairly singled out.
Pretty straightforward. It obviously includes both cis males and trans females. And no, trans women are neither not being singled out. This is a problem that we do not have all of the answers to yet. A dogmatic approach from either extreme is not the answer.
 
Top