Unfortunately, this is all just gibberish and half-truths. You have never supported any of your claims with testable, falsifiable, reproducible, or observable evidence. Can you give me an example of just one of the experimental evidence you've mentioned?
This is the only kind of evidence that really matters because everything else is strictly belief. I am telling you that ALL EVIDENCE, ALL LOGIC, AND ALL EXPERIMENT support my theory. It's just this simple. Yes, when you get down to the brass tacks of reality nothing is so simple. There are minor inconsistencies. I'm always finding more of these inconsistencies and trying to resolve them. I often can resolve them and I often tweak my theory to conform to these facts. I VERY RARELY mention any of them specifically because I know people will latch on but even more I'm using them as a check to see if anyone is paying attention. Pretty much no one is because nobody has pointed one out in a very long time. If you can find such an inconsistency I'd be EXCEEDINGLY INTERESTED because it could disprove my whole theory and I could spend my efforts elsewhere. Even if it's minor it could be one I hadn't thought of. Frankly it would be nice to see someone actually considering what I'm saying.
What predictions can you make based on your beliefs about reality? Lets hear them.
You couldda asked this a long time ago.
I campaigned for years to get infrared testing done on G1 because the Pyramid Texts very clearly says the second Sphinx is subsumed under the NE corner and this is supported by the gravimetric scan. Literature says this second Sphinx they actually called the "Mafdet Lynx" ("lynx is probably a bad translation for "mongoose") is surrounded by high walls on which are inscribed their version of the "Handbook of Chemistry and Physics" that they called the "Book of Thot" (the book of human progress). My interpretation suggested there would be a hot spot in the fall "exactly" the height of the "3b3w" (the height the water sprayed)(81' 3") at the base from the NE corner. Instead they found the hot spot twice this distance (~161' 4"). This error explains more evidence for how the pyramid was built.
When the hot spot I predicted was found an urgent call went out not to engineers or scientists to explain it but to Egyptologists. Of course they can't but I knew in advance this would be exist and they know it. I also predicted a hot spot below the chevrons at the entrance and a tunnel going straight in that were found and confirmed by muon imaging. Indeed, I can pretty much tell you most of the results of the testing but they refuse to release any data that doesn't support their beliefs and these results only fit my beliefs in ancient scientists and stinky footed bumpkins. They have apparently stopped all testing after taking my suggestion to look inside the hot spot using a boroscope. There appears to be a guide for one shoved in the biggest hole where Mafdet's body heat is seeping out of the pyramid. I know what's inside ofg here and Hawass kind of suggested it's exactly what I predicted though he never admitted using a boroscope. He suggested that there is a natural fissure just inside. I believed it was more like a passage but it looks like I was wrong.
My theory has been explaining just about everything they've found since I've been watching. Of course I didn't predict things like a cistern that could only be filled by running water in a desert but it is only explicable in terms of my theory.
It is true that what people believe in can affect what people do. But all beliefs are conceptual, not perceptual. You can believe anything you want about the physical world, but it will never change the fact that a rock will always have the properties of a rock, regardless of your beliefs.
You think submarines can't fly and there's only one definition or understanding of "rock"!!! Our minds and beliefs don't directly affect reality but reality rarely directly affects our minds because everything is filtered through our beliefs and thoughts first. How can you be blind to this?
I am telling you that our consciousness doesn't work like all other consciousness any longer. There was a time that people saw reality directly and didn't even have words for "belief" or "thought". There were no words to try to explain the concept to them and they'd never understand. This is a good thing since if they did understand they might kill you as a mental defective. They could have no beliefs without thought and no thought without beliefs. They used a language that resonated with nature and their digital higher brain functions. We don't have digit higher brain functions because we have to translate reality itself into models and beliefs.
Is this really that complicated? What words would you use to get this across? Why do you think I'm talking about religion even after I repeatedly say that religion is a confused version of ancient science? Why do you think what I say contradicts reality? What experiment or logic says I'm wrong about anything?
Please tell me what scientific Theory was derived from observations only? I know of none.
E#very single Egyptologist believes ancient people were moribund changeless stinky footed bumpkins who dragged tombs up ramps. They will consider no evidence that doesn't support this. They will brook no dissent among the peers. This is in no way limited to Egyptology. Much of science is in a shambles because of a failed educational system and a belief that there is not always a need for data or scientific foundation.
Obviously every scientist is no fool and there's certainly real science taking place in almost every field. But ask yourself this simple question; how is it even possible no infrared imaging was made on any great pyramid until more than a century after its invention and 75 years after it was commercially available! Egyptology just doesn't care about no stinkin' data and now nearly four years aftyer they finally gathered the data that even a tourist could have found, they still won'ty release the data because they have said it doesn't conform to current beliefs. OF COURSE IT DOESN'T CONFORM TO CURRENT BELIEFS because all current beliefs are wrong and the data will fit my theory. This is why I wanted the tests in the first place. There are many more tests that will prove me right like finding copper hydroxide in protected areas north of the pyramid. Ancient science left plenty of clues that can be interpreted by modern science. But even without this testing the means that were really used to build the pyramids are right in plain sight but can't be seen because of our beliefs.
There are only two perspectives.
ROFL.
Curious how modern people think infinity is real but can't see there are an innumerable number of perspectives from between any other two perspectives. Reality is so impossibly complex that a new math is needed to convey it. Indeed little numbers don't even really exist at all and are merely concepts and symbols. There are no two things alike so what is the use for "2"? Our belief in "2" allows us to count rabbits and not see even one of them.[/QUOTE]
