Very good.
I have already written about this on this thread, so I know that you don't read all the posts.
We have already discussed the above.
You are no investigator, Luke. We have already dismissed Luke's nativity account, even though he tried to assimilate it in to what I call 'Truth Pills' that is, referring to known events in the hope that this would help credence of the whole story.
But if you are a competent historian you can only dismiss that section of the book. All you have to do now is learn more about the rest of the book. Which I don't think that you have.
The Christian story is a 'faith' story which was built upon the lives and missions of a few people, none of them who wanted to discard their own religion, and so some of Luke's anecdotes and incidents are true........... he was using 'Truth Pills' in his story.
Oh......... and since he surely believed in what he was writing, or at least meant his letter to be for the good of its addressee, I don't think that Luke was a bad man.