Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
And cattle that are butchered using modern methods are hung so that the blood drains as well. My point was the claim that the heart pumps the blood out does not hold water since that is not necessary. It will drain regardless of method of hung properly.
I would suggest watching some of the videos on YouTube. Granted, a bolt might not hit home. But when both are done properly the bolt method is more humane.
If you decide on the standard of proof, then no doubt, you feel that what you consider evidence proves something and any contrary set of standards is unreasonable. Self serving, but internally consistent.
Only a non sequitur if you can't follow basic logic and if you don't know the rules of the DIR.
Well, at least the way YOU define it -- complying with your system of understanding and reaching the conclusion which you have decided is necessary.
I like how you slip in "literal interpretation" there as if it doesn't introduce two fatal flaws to your statement. But whatever works for you.
I'm happy to have people judge me by what I post. I have not come here and made erroneous claims about Judaism or made statements about some phantom morality which needs be superior. If you are comfortable with your errors, factual and logical then so be it.
Nor have I. But then you are projecting again.
You keep on using that word. I do not think that that word means what you think it means.
Of course I do.
Then you misunderstand what a factual error is. All I did was say that the practice has a place within a belief system so your method of judging based outside of that belief system doesn't work (as clarified in post 74). There is no error in fact.
Really? So your statement "It is supposedly done to get rid of the blood from flesh" is factually accurate (though you give no proof)? My objection comes from a study of Judaism (have you learned Gemara Chulin?) So this is not my personal belief but the dictates of the religion whose belief system was the subject of the original post.
Now, again, THIS is projecting as you have started with your personal sense of what is valid and then claimed that the lack of a fact that satisfies YOUR understanding of valid is a truth in the world.
Santeria, an alleged religion, continues animal sacrifices.
only those made out of balloonsYour religion requires you to ritualistically slit an animals throat?
Santeria is a religion, and their ritual slaughter - while protected - must comply with humane methods as outlined by US laws and regulations. And they do.
Good Lord, that is monstrous.