• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

ICE to hire contractor to transport 225,000 migrants to shelters across the US

shmogie

shmogie

Well-Known Member
ADigitalArtist said:
Right. Like the "Relocation Centers" of 1942.
Click to expand...
Not even close. Self supporting American citizens were illegally detained in 1942.

In the modern case, these are not citizens, and they are not self supporting. Further they have broken the law by entering the US illegally.

They have no inherent right to be here, till the are legally declared as legal.

It is the largesse of the American people that allows them housing, food, and medical care till their case is adjudicated.

Approx. 90% if released before their hearing will never have a hearing, they will never return and will remain illegal.

Of those who do have hearings, approx 90% will not meet the legal requirements for asylum.
 
BSM1

BSM1

What? Me worry?
shmogie said:
Not even close. Self supporting American citizens were illegally detained in 1942.

In the modern case, these are not citizens, and they are not self supporting. Further they have broken the law by entering the US illegally.

They have no inherent right to be here, till the are legally declared as legal.

It is the largesse of the American people that allows them housing, food, and medical care till their case is adjudicated.

Approx. 90% if released before their hearing will never have a hearing, they will never return and will remain illegal.

Of those who do have hearings, approx 90% will not meet the legal requirements for asylum.
Click to expand...

Good luck using common sense and facts in this argument...
 
Stanyon

Stanyon

WWMRD?
ADigitalArtist said:
Right. Like the "Relocation Centers" of 1942.
Click to expand...

That's a bit overdramatized isn't it?

There are alternatives:

Send them to sanctuary cities so they can feed and house them in hotels and motels and provide security while they wait-- oh yeah, they didn't want them.

Celebrities that are in favour of mass immigration could let them live in the spare rooms in their mansions and put up tent cities on their grounds:
For example:
Nikki Minaj, George Clooney, Anne Hathaway, Kristen Bell, Chrissy Tiegan, Mark Hamill. Etc.

I doubt it will happen though
 
Last edited:
Quetzal

Quetzal

A little to the left and slightly out of focus.
Premium Member
David1967 said:
No disrespect intended, but where are we supposed to send them?
Click to expand...
Let's take this a step further. Once we prosecute them, then what? It is highly likely that they do not have finances to pay a fine. To incarcerate them would just add an even greater financial burden than just letting them in. The big question I would like to have answered is 'Okay... now what?'
 
metis

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
Landon Caeli said:
The Trump administration is looking to hire a private contractor that will be responsible for transporting approximately 225,000 migrant children and families to shelters across the country over the next five years as they wait for their asylum claims to be processed

ICE to hire contractor to transport 225,000 migrants to shelters across the US
Click to expand...
It would be a heckofa lot cheaper and much more effective if they hire one person to take Trump to Moscow to be with his lover Vladimir permanently.
 
Shiranui117

Shiranui117

Pronounced Shee-ra-noo-ee
Premium Member
Quetzal said:
Let's take this a step further. Once we prosecute them, then what? It is highly likely that they do not have finances to pay a fine. To incarcerate them would just add an even greater financial burden than just letting them in. The big question I would like to have answered is 'Okay... now what?'
Click to expand...
If they don't meet the requirements for asylum, we follow our laws and deport them. If they really want to get into this country, they can get to the back of the line of people seeking to legally immigrate.

ADigitalArtist said:
Right. Like the "Relocation Centers" of 1942.
Click to expand...
Or sanctuary cities could change their minds and welcome the asylum-seekers like they say they supposedly would...

If you want them in the country, you have to be willing to do something. This isn't Dungeons & Dragons where we can send them to a pocket dimension while they wait. We have to put them somewhere in the country and take on all the economic and human costs that come along with that.
 
Stanyon

Stanyon

WWMRD?
Angela Merkel on mass immigration in Germany and Europe:
" it was a big mistake"

Feel free to repeat history though, but at what cost?
 
fantome profane

fantome profane

Anti-Woke = Anti-Justice
Premium Member
Is this going to speed up the processes or slow it down? Is this going to make it easier to track these people, or make it harder? Does this help the immigration problem or make it worse?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top