• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Question About Matthew 2:9

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
Sorry, but as interesting as it may be I don't have an hour to invest in it.
Inquiring minds want to know... trollers don't :rolleyes:

But I do thank you for the question... it would appear than now I understand how the heavens declared the coming of the Messiah as the star (and stars) told the story and helped the Magi understand the times.
 

sooda

Veteran Member
How old is the more distant Bethlehem? I can find archaeological references to the Templars but not to biblical times.

I don't really know the answer.

"In those days a decree went out from Caesar Augustus that all the world should be enrolled. This was the first enrollment, when Quirinius was governor of Syria. And all went to be enrolled, each to his own city. And Joseph also went up from Galilee, from the city of Nazareth, to Judea, to the city of David, which is called Bethlehem, because he was of the house and lineage of David, to be enrolled with Mary, his betrothed, who was with child. And while they were there, the time came for her to be delivered. And she gave birth to her first-born son and wrapped Him in swaddling cloths, and laid Him in a manger, because there was no place for them in the inn." (Luke 2:1-7 RSV)

In an attempt to kill the newborn Christ, Bethlehem was the scene of the "slaughter of the innocents" by Herod:



"Then Herod, when he saw that he had been tricked by the wise men, was in a furious rage, and he sent and killed all the male children in Bethlehem and in all that region who were two years old or under, according to the time which he had ascertained from the wise men. Then was fulfilled what was spoken by the prophet Jeremiah: "A voice was heard in Ramah, wailing and loud lamentation, Rachel weeping for her children; she refused to be consoled, because they were no more." (Matthew 2:16-18 RSV)
Bethlehem in Zebulun

The Bethlehem in Zebulun, now a ruin, was located about 6 miles north west of Nazareth. It's mentioned specifically only once in the Bible, among a listing of cities within the tribal allotment of Zebulun during the time of Joshua:

Notice Zebulon and Nazareth.

twobeth.gif
 

sooda

Veteran Member
Who said anything about lambing? The shepherds tended their flocks out of doors throughout the warmer part of the year. Only in winter did they keep them under cover. Jesus was not born in winter. It has been calculated to be around October.

Someone needs to read scripture instead of adding their own spin to everything. :facepalm: I think you demonstrate who needs to do their homework.


Winter in Palestine is quite mild and pleasant... and that's when there is adequate pasture. Haven't you been there?
 

blü 2

Veteran Member
Premium Member
"And Joseph also went up from Galilee, from the city of Nazareth, to Judea, to the city of David, which is called Bethlehem"
That would (also) rule out 'Bethlehem in Galilee' in favor of Bethelem near the city of Jerusalem.

Which would uphold the point in the OP.
In an attempt to kill the newborn Christ, Bethlehem was the scene of the "slaughter of the innocents" by Herod:
Well, in that version of the story, yes. In history and in Mark, and arguably John, no.
The Bethlehem in Zebulun, now a ruin, was located about 6 miles north west of Nazareth. It's mentioned specifically only once in the Bible, among a listing of cities within the tribal allotment of Zebulun during the time of Joshua:
I don't find any mention of 'Bethlehem' on your link. Have I missed something?
 

sealchan

Well-Known Member
Consider:

Matthew 2:1-11 (RSV)
1Now when Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the king, behold, wise men from the East came to Jerusalem, saying, 2 “Where is he who has been born king of the Jews? For we have seen his star in the East, and have come to worship him.” 3 When Herod the king heard this, he was troubled, and all Jerusalem with him; 4 and assembling all the chief priests and scribes of the people, he inquired of them where the Christ was to be born. 5 They told him, “In Bethlehem of Judea; for so it is written by the prophet:

6
‘And you, O Bethlehem, in the land of Judah,
are by no means least among the rulers of Judah;
for from you shall come a ruler
who will govern my people Israel.’”

7 Then Herod summoned the wise men secretly and ascertained from them what time the star appeared; 8 and he sent them to Bethlehem, saying, “Go and search diligently for the child, and when you have found him bring me word, that I too may come and worship him.” 9 When they had heard the king they went their way; and lo, the star which they had seen in the East went before them, till it came to rest over the place where the child was. 10 When they saw the star, they rejoiced exceedingly with great joy; 11 and going into the house they saw the child with Mary his mother, and they fell down and worshiped him. Then, opening their treasures, they offered him gifts, gold and frankincense and myrrh.

Question: In as much as Herod's temple in Jerusalem is only about 5 miles from Bethlehem

a) Exactly how could a star, which would be at least 4.22 light-years* from Earth be seen to move five miles

b) and then stop?




* the closest star to earth, Proxima Centauri.

.

Given that the author of Matthew was pleased to try and incorporate ideas from other religions to help him shape the new religion he was crafting through his origin story of Jesus, I think he heard something about the Magi and either borrowed elements of a known story or made one up and left the detail of a moving star as just one of many miracles that were palatable to his audience who lived in a time where miracles were palatable. Sort of like how we like stories with superheroes and their miraculous powers today.
 

shmogie

Well-Known Member
There are many things that do not involve our worship that are left to our own judgment. The key element here is "worship".
The two main celebrations held in Christendom are both firmly rooted in pagan worship. We have strong Biblical admonition NOT to try to fuse true worship with false worship.

2 Corinthians 6:14-18.....ESV
"Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers. For what partnership has righteousness with lawlessness? Or what fellowship has light with darkness? What accord has Christ with Belial? Or what portion does a believer share with an unbeliever? What agreement has the temple of God with idols? For we are the temple of the living God; as God said, “I will make my dwelling among them and walk among them, and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. Therefore go out from their midst, and be separate from them, says the Lord, and touch no unclean thing; then I will welcome you, and I will be a father to you, and you shall be sons and daughters to me, says the Lord Almighty.

Does this leave room for grafting Christianity over paganism? What is the admonition? "Get out" "separate from them"....only then will God accept us as his "sons and daughters".

When Israel tried blending their worship with that of Baal, God punished them. Elijah's famous confrontation with the Baal prophets demonstrated this. God did not let it continue and put to death those who promoted it.



There is no "Christian" way to celebrate what is in every way, a pagan festival, simply rebranded. Jews did not celebrate birthdays back in ancient times because of its pagan association with astrology. (something God considered detestable) Birth dates were used to cast horoscopes. Can you find me any birthdates or birthday celebrations in the Bible where the person was not pagan, and it did not involve the loss of someone's life?

If Jesus did not celebrate his own birthday for that reason, then why would he approve of such a celebration today? All the customs of Christmas are borrowed from the saturnalia....the gift giving....the gluttonous feasting....and alcohol fuelled merry-making....they changed nothing but the name and grafted in other elements associated with Northern Hemisphere pagan Winter traditions.

Regardless of what you call it, it was never a "Christian" celebration until an apostate church system embraced it and changed the name. Northern Hemisphere winter customs are ridiculous in a Southern Hemisphere climate. Sleighbells and snow in the middle of an Aussie summer just don't mesh.



This is pure justification surely? Christ was not born in December because it is the cold, rainy, sometimes snowy winter time in the Middle East. The shepherds were outdoors tending their flocks when Jesus was born, but in winter, they kept their flocks under cover. The date comes from the saturnalia too. Mithra was the god....very little changed.

Regardless of the customs, the whole world (mostly unchristian) celebrates Christmas as primarily a greed-fest with expensive gifts often given grudgingly for the wrong reason.....the debt is often burdensome. It's an excuse to overindulge in food and alcohol, just as the original was. It is very much a secular holiday in many nations....seen as just a commercial holiday....a very lucrative one. Does that make you cringe? I used to celebrate it.....grew up with it, but as soon as I realised what it really was, I was disgusted and avoided having anything to do with it. But it's amazing what people will justify in order to keep doing what they love.



All very noble pursuits, but can't you do that at any time of year? Should Christians need a date to give them a reason to honour Christ or to help the less fortunate? At Christmastime, those who have no family or who are poor or disadvantaged by mental or physical illness are forced to endure what is to them, often the loneliest and most miserable time of the year. Police will tell you that alcohol fuelled domestic violence is rampant at Christmastime. Poor kids look at how generous santa is to the rich kids and wonder why he was so mean to them? You gloss over what is experienced by the masses at that time of year.



Now I am a bit bemused by this. This implies that our kids are somehow disadvantaged by not receiving Christmas presents...?

When my own kids were at school, they were the envy of other kids because they never had to wait for birthdays or Christmas to get presents. If our children saw something that sparked their interest, if it was affordable and appropriate, they received it as a gift of love, without having to wait for a date to receive it.
When asked "what did you get that for?" by other children, they would be puzzled because we need no excuses to give our children presents....we give them gifts when we want to, all year round. Often when kids see a toy or gadget that is popular, they see Christmas or their birthday as forever away, and often by then the toy has lost its attraction.
We had one young boy tell us that if it wasn't for Christmas or birthdays, he wouldn't get anything. How sad is that?

We often have children's parties for no particular reason, and the host child is the one who gives gifts to all the other kids. There is no spoilt brat throwing tantrums because it's their special day. So please don't give me the deprived children nonsense.......OK?

If our kids get presents from well meaning relatives at Christmas, they know what it's all about.



One day to honour God? Where will I find that? Where will I find Paul advocating a Sabbath observance for Christians, many of whom were former pagans? Sabbath was for Jews only, as was circumcision, not included in the "necessary" or "essential" "requirements" for Christians. (Acts 15:28-29)

There were no festivals or holidays to be observed by Christians, unlike those precisely prescribed for Israel.......there was just ONE observance that Jesus said to hold each year....the observance of the memorial of his death. It replaced the Passover for Jewish Christians and was held annually on the same date. There is no question about this date because it is clearly stated in scripture.

Christendom adopted Easter to graft over this annual observance and completely corrupted it. All the customs of Easter (even its name) are pagan to its bootstraps. From the dawn service, to the hot cross buns, to the rabbits and eggs all tied into a fertility festival honouring a pagan goddess of Spring. Her name was pronounced "Easter".

Do some homework Shmogie....please! I know you mean well, but you are dead wrong about these things. You cannot Christianise paganism....you only paganise the Christianity... :(

I would humbly suggest that I know more about the history of the Christian Church than you.

I have debated these very same issues over the years with JWś so I very clearly understand your position, and it is wrong.

You seem to think that there is inherent power in those things you deem pagan. If on Dec. 25 someone puts a large log in their fireplace, to you it becomes a yule log, a pagan symbol.

Further, to you this log has inherent power to pollute the purity of this persons Christian faith.

Nothing has any power over our faith unless we give it that power. You give the log power, to the guy putting the log in the fireplace, it is just a chunk of wood, nothing more.

The average Christian couldn´t care less about what may or may not have happened regarding the establishment of the official date for Christmas, about 1500 years ago.

They couldn´t care less about the winter solstice, that day is the same as any other.

So, celebrating the birth of Christ within the context of Christianity on Dec. 25 has no inherent power to pollute a believer, unless we give it that power.

JW´s give this kind of power to all kinds of things. The cross, since they are convinced Christ died on a stake, which is most likely wrong. But it doesn´t make any difference.

Art, if it appears somehow pagan, it can´t be appreciated.

A Christmas tree.

A kids birthday party.

When I was a Seventh Day Adventist Elder and Bible teacher, before the true Gospel found me, I would have accused you of the very same thing your denomination hurls at other Christians, incorporating paganism in your worship. Meeting and worshiping on Sun Day, is meeting on a pagan holiday, the day the pagan sun worshipers set aside to honor their god.

Why do you do it ? Of course that doesn´t make any difference to you, or me, because we don´t give the day any power over us.

Yet you condemn others for doing what you do every week, but they do it once a year.

With respect, your denominational stand on these things appears to be just another form of works based efforts to please God. A particularly delicious form of martyrdom.

JW criticism of others on these matters are crying about a wolf, which is actually a kitten. A kitten to whom you have given immense power, a very evil kitten. To my it is just a cuddly kitten with no power over me whatsoever.
 

URAVIP2ME

Veteran Member
It is a star that nobody documented what it really was
So who measured that as 4.22 light years from Earth?
It is a star that only appeared during the birth of Christ
That is why we don't see that star around anymore.
It was a special star - just for that occasion only.
We don't see it but the Magi saw it.
It was a lucky star
A sort of firework to herald the birth of the Lord Jesus Christ.

I wonder how having the boys 2 years and younger murdered proved to be a lucky star __________
I find the angel stopped the astrologers (magi) from returning to Jesus' enemy in Jerusalem.
After all, that so-called *star* led the magi to 'Jerusalem', and Not to Bethlehem according to Scripture.
 

Skwim

Veteran Member
Given that the author of Matthew was pleased to try and incorporate ideas from other religions to help him shape the new religion he was crafting through his origin story of Jesus, I think he heard something about the Magi and either borrowed elements of a known story or made one up and left the detail of a moving star as just one of many miracles that were palatable to his audience who lived in a time where miracles were palatable. Sort of like how we like stories with superheroes and their miraculous powers today.
Certainly a possibility.

.
 

MJFlores

Well-Known Member
I wonder how having the boys 2 years and younger murdered proved to be a lucky star __________
I find the angel stopped the astrologers (magi) from returning to Jesus' enemy in Jerusalem.
After all, that so-called *star* led the magi to 'Jerusalem', and Not to Bethlehem according to Scripture.

The act of one is not the act of the other
If Herod ordered the killing of infants it wasn't because of the star
It was because of frustration that the Magi failed to report
the whereabouts of the baby Jesus

If the Magi saw it, then they saw it.
It was a special star - it moved like
it was their GPS tracker

images
 

Deeje

Avid Bible Student
Premium Member
I would humbly suggest that I know more about the history of the Christian Church than you.

You can assume that if you wish. :D

I have debated these very same issues over the years with JWś so I very clearly understand your position, and it is wrong.

You can also assume that. Of course I disagree.

You seem to think that there is inherent power in those things you deem pagan. If on Dec. 25 someone puts a large log in their fireplace, to you it becomes a yule log, a pagan symbol.

I guess one has to wonder why "Christians" need to borrow pagan holidays and customs in the first place? Are there not 365 days in a year? Can they not come up with their own celebrations and customs? Why graft "Christianity" over paganism at all?
If you really know the history of the church then you know the answer to that.

In view of 2 Corinthians 6:14-18 IMO, you have completely missed the point. Anything that is spiritually "unclean" is unacceptable to God....so unless we "separate" from those offensive things, God will not accept us as his "sons and daughters"......could Paul have made it any clearer? :shrug:

Further, to you this log has inherent power to pollute the purity of this persons Christian faith.

Was the worship of the golden calf acceptable to God because the Israelites called it "a festival to Jehovah"? How did he respond?

Why did Elijah make the Israelites choose which god they worshipped when they tried to fuse true worship with Baal worship?

Nothing has any power over our faith unless we give it that power. You give the log power, to the guy putting the log in the fireplace, it is just a chunk of wood, nothing more.

What has corrupting power over one's faith is pretending that false worship can be mixed with true worship without offending God. He won't prevent people from making those decisions, but he will hold them accountable I believe. It's not like we don't have Biblical precedents.

The average Christian couldn´t care less about what may or may not have happened regarding the establishment of the official date for Christmas, about 1500 years ago.

And that right there is the basis of the problem. It doesn't matter if humans care....it matters if God cares. Is it just the big things that count with God?

Luke 16:10...
"The person faithful in what is least is faithful also in much, and the person unrighteous in what is least is unrighteous also in much."

They couldn´t care less about the winter solstice, that day is the same as any other.

Again, does it matter to God? Is it being faithful in what is least in view of 2 Corinthians 6:14-18??

So, celebrating the birth of Christ within the context of Christianity on Dec. 25 has no inherent power to pollute a believer, unless we give it that power.

The whole celebration was never "Christian" to begin with, so why would any Christian want to engage in it? December 25th with all its customs was originally celebrated in honor of a false god. To then use that exact same date and customs and pretend that Christ and his Father would approve of it just by changing the name, is a little self-deluding IMO.

JW´s give this kind of power to all kinds of things. The cross, since they are convinced Christ died on a stake, which is most likely wrong. But it doesn´t make any difference.

Again, the instrument used to put Jesus to death is not important unless people want to make an idol of it. The Command of God to his people was NOT to make an image of anything to be used in connection with their worship. If the origins of the cross as an ancient (and disgusting) religious symbol was not so sordid, it might not be so bad, but we see the cross in ancient art as a symbol of sex and phallic worship.....so the devil has a great many "Christians" deceived as far as I can see.

Cherishing an image of something used to kill your best friend is actually bizarre. What if Jesus had been hung on a gallows or run through with a spear.....what then?
The instrument used (as described in the Bible) is a "stauros" which means an upright stake. There is no cross in the Bible.

Art, if it appears somehow pagan, it can´t be appreciated.

A Christmas tree.

A kids birthday party.

Art has its place, but how are these "art"? How is the "Christmas tree" connected to Christ? How are birthday celebrations that mimic ancient spiritistic practices connected to Christianity? Why birthday candles? Why birthday "wishes"? If the Jews didn't celebrate birthdays (nor did they ever record birth dates) because it was a pagan practice tied in to false worship, why would a Christian even want to imitate them?

When I was a Seventh Day Adventist Elder and Bible teacher, before the true Gospel found me, I would have accused you of the very same thing your denomination hurls at other Christians, incorporating paganism in your worship. Meeting and worshiping on Sun Day, is meeting on a pagan holiday, the day the pagan sun worshipers set aside to honor their god.

Many of our congregations meet on Saturday and some even meet on week nights if they share a Kingdom Hall. The weekend is usually a good time when a lot of people don't have to work. We have no 'special' day...it's just what fits in with the majority of the congregations. Where did you get the idea that we only meet on Sundays?

Because there is no Sabbath observance for Christians, should we imagine that we can't meet on any day of the week that isn't dedicated to a false god?
We would have to move to another planet. We didn't invent the names used in the current calendar, nor do we worship those gods.....that calendar was a product of Pope Gregory.......such a good Christian.....:rolleyes:

Yet you condemn others for doing what you do every week, but they do it once a year.

What???? Christendom holds it services on Sunday because it is a holy day to them...no? As a former SDA you already know that the Jewish Sabbath was our Saturday. Does the fact that it is a day named after Saturn mean that it taints the Sabbath for Jews living in western nations?

With respect, your denominational stand on these things appears to be just another form of works based efforts to please God. A particularly delicious form of martyrdom.

"A delicious form of martyrdom"....really? Or is it just an attempt to be "faithful in what is least" so that we don't "strain at gnats and gulp down camels"? :oops:

JW criticism of others on these matters are crying about a wolf, which is actually a kitten. A kitten to whom you have given immense power, a very evil kitten. To my it is just a cuddly kitten with no power over me whatsoever.

Oh please...I have been on both sides of this fence and I made my investigations very thoroughly. The way God responded to Israel's many excursions into false worship leaves me in no doubt. Even the seemingly small things can be a test of our resolve to remain free of 'spiritually unclean' things. We are told to separate ourselves from them....not to jump into bed with them. How contaminated does something have to be before it makes you sick? Many of the things that can be life threatening to humans are microscopic.....you don't even know when they have entered your body.

What makes something "unclean" to God may not seem like much at all to someone who can justify what God condemns....but we have to love the truth, not the lies. (2 Thessalonians 2:9-12)

That cuddly kitten may prove to carrying a deadly disease called denial.....one bite is all it takes. :(
 

shmogie

Well-Known Member
You can assume that if you wish. :D



You can also assume that. Of course I disagree.



I guess one has to wonder why "Christians" need to borrow pagan holidays and customs in the first place? Are there not 365 days in a year? Can they not come up with their own celebrations and customs? Why graft "Christianity" over paganism at all?
If you really know the history of the church then you know the answer to that.

In view of 2 Corinthians 6:14-18 IMO, you have completely missed the point. Anything that is spiritually "unclean" is unacceptable to God....so unless we "separate" from those offensive things, God will not accept us as his "sons and daughters"......could Paul have made it any clearer? :shrug:



Was the worship of the golden calf acceptable to God because the Israelites called it "a festival to Jehovah"? How did he respond?

Why did Elijah make the Israelites choose which god they worshipped when they tried to fuse true worship with Baal worship?



What has corrupting power over one's faith is pretending that false worship can be mixed with true worship without offending God. He won't prevent people from making those decisions, but he will hold them accountable I believe. It's not like we don't have Biblical precedents.



And that right there is the basis of the problem. It doesn't matter if humans care....it matters if God cares. Is it just the big things that count with God?

Luke 16:10...
"The person faithful in what is least is faithful also in much, and the person unrighteous in what is least is unrighteous also in much."



Again, does it matter to God? Is it being faithful in what is least in view of 2 Corinthians 6:14-18??



The whole celebration was never "Christian" to begin with, so why would any Christian want to engage in it? December 25th with all its customs was originally celebrated in honor of a false god. To then use that exact same date and customs and pretend that Christ and his Father would approve of it just by changing the name, is a little self-deluding IMO.



Again, the instrument used to put Jesus to death is not important unless people want to make an idol of it. The Command of God to his people was NOT to make an image of anything to be used in connection with their worship. If the origins of the cross as an ancient (and disgusting) religious symbol was not so sordid, it might not be so bad, but we see the cross in ancient art as a symbol of sex and phallic worship.....so the devil has a great many "Christians" deceived as far as I can see.

Cherishing an image of something used to kill your best friend is actually bizarre. What if Jesus had been hung on a gallows or run through with a spear.....what then?
The instrument used (as described in the Bible) is a "stauros" which means an upright stake. There is no cross in the Bible.



Art has its place, but how are these "art"? How is the "Christmas tree" connected to Christ? How are birthday celebrations that mimic ancient spiritistic practices connected to Christianity? Why birthday candles? Why birthday "wishes"? If the Jews didn't celebrate birthdays (nor did they ever record birth dates) because it was a pagan practice tied in to false worship, why would a Christian even want to imitate them?



Many of our congregations meet on Saturday and some even meet on week nights if they share a Kingdom Hall. The weekend is usually a good time when a lot of people don't have to work. We have no 'special' day...it's just what fits in with the majority of the congregations. Where did you get the idea that we only meet on Sundays?

Because there is no Sabbath observance for Christians, should we imagine that we can't meet on any day of the week that isn't dedicated to a false god?
We would have to move to another planet. We didn't invent the names used in the current calendar, nor do we worship those gods.....that calendar was a product of Pope Gregory.......such a good Christian.....:rolleyes:



What???? Christendom holds it services on Sunday because it is a holy day to them...no? As a former SDA you already know that the Jewish Sabbath was our Saturday. Does the fact that it is a day named after Saturn mean that it taints the Sabbath for Jews living in western nations?



"A delicious form of martyrdom"....really? Or is it just an attempt to be "faithful in what is least" so that we don't "strain at gnats and gulp down camels"? :oops:



Oh please...I have been on both sides of this fence and I made my investigations very thoroughly. The way God responded to Israel's many excursions into false worship leaves me in no doubt. Even the seemingly small things can be a test of our resolve to remain free of 'spiritually unclean' things. We are told to separate ourselves from them....not to jump into bed with them. How contaminated does something have to be before it makes you sick? Many of the things that can be life threatening to humans are microscopic.....you don't even know when they have entered your body.

What makes something "unclean" to God may not seem like much at all to someone who can justify what God condemns....but we have to love the truth, not the lies. (2 Thessalonians 2:9-12)

That cuddly kitten may prove to carrying a deadly disease called denial.....one bite is all it takes. :(
Your defense of sunday worship is interesting, but you apparently do not know the history of why it became the Christian worship day.

Constantine declared it so as the head of the Roman empire. Many believe this was to bring pagans in who worshiped the sun god on that day.

So your argument fails. If a guy putting a log in the fireplace on Dec. 25 is worshiping pagan gods, then certainly JWś worshiping on a day which was a day for worshiping a pagan god, declared to be a Christian day of worship by what you would call corrupt Christianity is just as bad, if not worse.

You cannot have it both ways, it is hypocritical to condemn others, while you excuse yourselves for doing the same thing.

Lets talk about the worshiping thing.

You bring up the golden calf, and it being worshiped, certainly a pagan rite.

The Israelites believed it was a god, had the power of a god, and dedicated themselves as a followers of this god.

A Christmas tree in the home is not accepted as a god, no one believes it has any power, and no one dedicates themselves as followers of the tree, yet you accuse them of worshiping a pagan God.

Isn´t this exactly your position regarding sunday ?

You mention things being unclean to God. Well, he certainly declared that pork and shellfish are unclean, do you eat them ?

So then, in your mind I worship pagan Gods because I celebrate the birth of Christ on Dec. 25.

I compound this pagan worship by having a cut pine tree in my living room.

Whether I believe in a pagan god, or actively worship it, is irrelevant, that pine tree and that celebration on that day makes God angry.

I live in the Southwest, and there are many artifacts of the Indian cultures that existed in the area. I have found some on my own land.

What if I found an interesting looking stone, obviously hand worked, and one of my Indian friends tells me it was used in a religious ceremony. Am I worshiping Indian Gods if I keep it and display it ? Is God angry with me ?

Denominations major in minors. Many of the more cultish ones want to have a badge they can wear that shows them to be somehow superior in the purity of their beliefs, and gives them justification for criticizing others.

For SDAś it is the sabbath, for JWś it is Christmas,and Easter ( ishtar worship !!) holidayś et. al., and translations of the Bible.

All of this is pure nonsense.

God judges the heart, motives and attitudes.

He knows what pagan worship is, and what is required for it to be so.

A cut pine tree in my living room, or you going to the kingdom hall on Sunday to worship God ain´t it.
 

Hockeycowboy

Witness for Jehovah
Premium Member
"...For we [astrologers] saw his star in the East..."

Question: why would God use astrologers, i.e., people using practices He condemned, to lead an enemy (Herod) to His son?

God wouldn't....but Satan would.

This "star" first led them, where? Jerusalem! Not Bethlehem! This was to get Herod involved, to let him know about a prophesied rival King....Herod wanted to kill Jesus.

The extent of exegetical obfuscation Satan has fostered among Christendom's religions is amazing! And less so, the world's other religions.

-- Revelation 12:9; Matthew 7:21-23
 
Last edited:

Skwim

Veteran Member
Question: why would God use astrologers, i.e., people using practices He condemned, to lead an enemy (Herod) to His son?

God wouldn't....but Satan would.

This "star" first led them, where? Jerusalem! Not Bethlehem! This was to get Herod involved, to let him know about a prophesied rival King....Herod wanted to kill Jesus.

The extent of exegetical obfuscation Satan has fostered among Christendom's religions is amazing! And less so, the world's religions.

-- Revelation 12:9; Matthew 7:21-23
So, I assume, you believe Satan has messed with a whole lot of the Bible in order to mislead the believer. Pretty much renders any exegesis of the book completely untrustworthy doesn't it?

Should we be expecting a mass Bible burning in the future?

.

.
 

Hockeycowboy

Witness for Jehovah
Premium Member
So, I assume, you believe Satan has messed with a whole lot of the Bible in order to mislead the believer. Pretty much renders any exegesis of the book completely untrustworthy doesn't it?

Should we be expecting a mass Bible burning in the future?

.
.
No, you misunderstand (you're more astute than that)....he's influenced peoples' interpretation of it! I mean, professed Christians are told it's ok to kill their brothers if they live in an opposing country. That makes them wrong, not Scripture!
 

Skwim

Veteran Member
No, you misunderstand (you're more astute than that)....he's influenced peoples' interpretation of it! I mean, professed Christians are told it's ok to kill their brothers if they live in an opposing country. That makes them wrong, not Scripture!
But that's what exegesis is: critical explanations or interpretations of a text. And in light of your claim

"The extent of exegetical obfuscation Satan has fostered among Christendom's religions is amazing!"
any proper interpretation of biblical text would be obfuscated, and in turn mislead the believer.

.
 

Hockeycowboy

Witness for Jehovah
Premium Member
But that's what exegesis is: critical explanations or interpretations of a text. And in light of your claim

"The extent of exegetical obfuscation Satan has fostered among Christendom's religions is amazing!"
any proper interpretation of biblical text would be obfuscated, and in turn mislead the believer.

.
Yes...even if it was a correct understanding! Did you read my edit, about killing?
 

Hockeycowboy

Witness for Jehovah
Premium Member
Yes...even if it was a correct understanding! Did you read my edit, about killing?
@Skwim , iow, a person searching for accurate understanding of the Scriptures, would have to look at those teachers' actions. If they teach doctrinethat maybe even sounds right, the love they have for others, especially brothers, should be examined. -John 13:34-35.
 

Skwim

Veteran Member
I mean, professed Christians are told it's ok to kill their brothers if they live in an opposing country.
And you're saying that the Bible says this, and with no qualification? If so please cite the chapter and verse. If it isn't in the Bible then who is telling Christians such a thing?

.
 

Hockeycowboy

Witness for Jehovah
Premium Member
And you're saying that the Bible says this, and with no qualification? If so please cite the chapter and verse.
If I understand you correctly, I gave one: John 13:34..."I am giving you a new commandment, that you love one another; just as I have loved you..." (To what extent did Jesus love? He "gave his life for others". His followers should be willing to do the same....it's a "commandment".)
1 John 3:10-15 is especially profound.
If it isn't in the Bible then who is telling Christians such a thing?
Ever since Constantine the Great, many leaders of Christendom have encouraged their followers to support their respective States in times of war. They would rather have the State's approval than God's. But Christians should feel as did the Apostles, at Acts of the Apostles 5:29.
 
Top