whirlingmerc
Well-Known Member
Calling Jesus God is really a form of blasphemy.
only if it is not true
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Calling Jesus God is really a form of blasphemy.
actually he did
Before Abraham was I AM (a title of God)
John 8:58 Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am.actually he did
Before Abraham was I AM (a title of God)
Regarding what was meant, please see what I just posted to whirlingmerc: #84 Trailblazer, A moment agoAre you so certain that you know exactly what was meant? I AM could be the higher spirit of man... That something that makes us different from animals... conscientiousness??? Does that word work?
Regarding what was meant, please see what I just posted to whirlingmerc: #84 Trailblazer, A moment ago
John 8:58 Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am.
Jesus was saying that He existed before Abraham was born, and that is true because the soul of Jesus existed in the spiritual world before Abraham was born, since Jesus had pre-existence.
But that does not mean that Jesus was God.
You might want to read this article: The Pre-Existence of Jesus Christ
Are you so certain that you know exactly what was meant? I AM could be the higher spirit of man... That something that makes us different from animals... conscientiousness??? Does that word work?
The Jewish enemies of Jesus thought Jesus was saying He was God and that is why they stoned Him. But Jesus was not saying He was God, so they misunderstood Jesus. That is explained in the following article:The enemies of Jesus knew exactly what he meant and picked up rocks to stone him.
its not true, you have a very small view of God if you think Jesus can be God, God is God of the whole universe, not just earth. Jesus may well have been Gods primary ambassador to earth, but earth is just one puny planet in God's whole universe, unless as I said you think God is some grey haired old man sitting on a throne in heaven
The Jewish enemies of Jesus thought Jesus was saying He was God and that is why they stoned Him. But Jesus was not saying He was God, so they misunderstood Jesus. That is explained in the following article:
Did the Jews Accuse Jesus of Claiming to Be “God” or “a God”?
May 28, 2014 by Kermit Zarley 2 Comments
The Gospel of John relates one incident in which the Jews accused Jesus of “making himself equal to God” and another incident in which they said to him, “you, though only a human being, are making yourself God” (Jn 5.18; 10.33). (All scripture quotations are from the NRSV.) Since Christians have been taught that Jesus is God, they have been taught that these Jews were correct in making these accusations. But in each instance, Jesus’ immediate response represents a denial of those allegations (Jn 5.19-46; 10.34-38). In the second incident, did they charge Jesus with making himself “God,” as has been traditionally translated, or “a god”? In the Greek text of Jn 10.33, the word for “God,” theos, does not have the article, thus making it “a god.” But English Bibles don’t translate it that way. Versions with “God’s Son” include the NIV, NRSV, NEB, and versions with “the Son of God” include KJV, NASB, ESV.
The first incident, in Jn 5.1-9, was precipitated by Jesus healing a man on the Sabbath. Then we read, “the Jews started persecuting Jesus because he was doing such things on the sabbath. But Jesus answered them, ‘My Father is still working, and I also am working’” (vv. 16-17). Thus, Jesus here calls God his Father, as he so often did, and he implicitly identifies his work as the Father’s work. Then we read, “For this reason the Jews were seeking all the more to kill him, because he was not only breaking the sabbath, but was calling God his own Father, thereby making himself equal to God” (v. 18).
The author of this gospel does not mean that this was his own assessment, as most Christians have thought; rather, he means it was an incorrect assessment of the unbelieving Jews. This is proved by the two reasons given for their making such an accusation: Jesus healing on the sabbath and him calling God his Father. First, Jews had wrongly interpreted their Torah in saying that healing ought not be done on the sabbath, whereas Jesus implies in this exchange that God heals on the sabbath and that he does so through Jesus! Second, Jesus certainly didn’t make himself equal with God by calling God his Father, since he taught his disciples to do that too. So, Christians have been calling God their Father ever since, and they don’t think by doing so that they are making themselves equal with God.
Furthermore, claiming equality with God is not the same as claiming to be God. In claiming to be equal to someone, you necessarily distinguish yourself from that person. Jesus constantly distinguished himself from the “one” God of Judaism, whom he called “Father.”
In the second incident, in which the Jews accused Jesus of “making yourself God” (Jn 10.33), the Greek text has theos without the article. Ordinarily, this would be translated “a god” rather than “God.” But because most translators believe Jesus is God, they have translated it “God” rather than “a god.”
What precipitated this accusation by the Jews, in Jn 10.33? They asked Jesus to tell them plainly if he was the Messiah (Jn 10.24). He replied that he had already done so. He added that his miracles, which he had done in his Father’s name, testify to who he is (v. 25). He further added that his Father had given him his disciples, to whom he gives eternal life, and no one can snatch them out of both his hand and the Father’s hand (vv. 28-29). He concluded, “The Father and I are one” (v. 30). Some church fathers asserted that Jesus’ word “one” (Greek hen) was a claim to be of the same essence as that of the Father. On the contrary, Jesus meant he and the Father were unified in their relationship and work.
The Jews had heard the Johannine Jesus repeatedly calling God “the/my Father.” And he even discussed this with them in John 8.38-47. So, they should not be confused in thinking that Jesus believes he is God, whom he calls “the/my Father,” since he repeatedly distinguishes himself from God. So, it is more likely that the Jews accused Jesus of making himself out to be “a god” rather than “God.”
This translation, “a god,” fits much better with the scripture Jesus cited in his response. For we read, “Jesus answered, ‘Is it not written in your law, “I said, you are gods”?’” (Jn 10.34). Jesus herein quotes from Ps 82.6 in which the psalmist calls the rulers or judges of Israel “gods” (Heb. elohim). The psalmist surely doesn’t intend to identify these men precisely as gods, but that they are like gods since they represent Yahweh, their God, in judging his people Israel. Jesus then explains, “If those to whom the word of God came were called gods—and the scripture cannot be annulled—can you say that the one whom the Father has sanctified and sent into the world is blaspheming because I said, ‘I am God’s Son’?” (vv. 35-36). Jesus implies that it would be even more appropriate to call him “a god” in the sense the psalmist does of those rulers since he, Jesus, being sanctified and sent, has even more right to this title than they did. But Jesus then adds that he identifies himself as “God’s Son” rather than “a god.” Since he replied by quoting scripture about Israel’s rulers being called “gods,” it seems more likely that these Jews had accused Jesus of making himself out to be “a god” rather than Israel’s “God.”
Jesus is called “(the) Son (of God)” 27x in the Gospel of John, usually by Jesus himself. Every time, except twice, the word for “Son” in the Greek text, huios, has the article. The two that don’t are Jn 10.36 and 19.7, which latter is spoken by Jesus enemies. At first glance this seems odd that on this one occasion, reported in Jn 10.22-42, Jesus would call himself “son” without the article (anarthrous). However, by quoting Ps 82.6 in his reply, Jesus omitted the next portion which states, “and all of you sons of the Most High,” in which the article is also absent. Therein, the psalmist identifies Israel’s judges as both “gods” and “sons” of God.” So, when Jesus next says that he claims to be “God’s Son,” the article is absent in the Greek text, thus “a son of God.” Jesus is comparing himself to those judges. We might also ask when it was that he previously identified himself as God’s Son. Jesus repeatedly did so implicitly by calling God “my Father.” But the classic text in which he expressly did so is Mt 11.27/Lk 10.22. Therein, he identifies himself as “the Son,” thus huios in the Greek text with the article. It is not that Jesus wishes to refrain from identifying himself as “the Son of God,” but that in Jn 10.36 he compares himself to the judges mentioned in Ps 82 and thereby accommodates himself to that text by saying “a son of God.”
Furthermore, Matthew reports concerning the crucified Jesus, “the chief priests also, along with the scribes and elders, were mocking him, saying, ‘He saved others; he cannot save himself…. He trusts in God; let God deliver him now, if he wants to; for he said, “I am God’s Son”’” (Mt 27.41-43). Again, huios in the Greek text is without the article. Those enemies likely would not have mocked him by saying that he trusts in God if those Jews mentioned in Jn 10.33 had believed he made himself out to be God.
To sum, Jesus’ interlocutors in Jn 10.33 more likely accused him of making himself out to be a god rather than the God of Israel. And Jesus likely responded by calling himself “a son of God” in parallel to Ps 82 from which he quoted. Nevertheless, Jesus is “the Son of God” par excellence, and a huge majority of the huios texts applied to Jesus in the Greek New Testament so identify him.
(To see a titled list of over fifty, two-three page posts (easily accessible) about the Bible not saying Jesus is God, click here.)
Did the Jews Accuse Jesus of Claiming to Be “God” or “a God”?
Jesus even has the title "God with us"
Do you mean the disciples?and let me get this straight... you believe Jesus ... but not anyone Jesus trained or commissioned to teach????? ... Is that believing?
He didn't just make it up...you have a quote for that or did your religion just make it up??
It does not MATTER what Jesus said... I just got asked to leave a Christian forum, not because I posted ANYTHING about Baha'i, but because I posted what Jesus said we need to do to get to heaven.... They don't want to hear that, they want the free ride Paul told them they could have.So let me get this straight, basically Jesus said he wasn't God, but you don't believe Jesus' own words, you believe what someone else thought about Jesus, and believe them more than you believe Jesus, typical Christian!!
...Jesus never claimed to be God....
A. He who has seen Me has seen the Father. (John 14:9)...Sure he did (from page 64 of this book here)...
Of course you didn't, and at the same time other folks did.Sorry, I did not see anything there...
The local Jehovah's Witnesses seemed to have flagged my house as some kind of 'no-go' zone. They used to come over to my house & I'd welcome them in to study the Sacred Text together, but my agreeing w/ them was never enough. As it turned out the goal wasn't just our being right, but rather my being wrong....I just got asked to leave a Christian forum, not because I posted ANYTHING about Baha'i, but because I posted what Jesus said...
Clearly, Jesus was more than a man. It is my belief that Jesus was made of the substance of God, but that does not mean that all of God became a man.
God is Spirit. The Spirit of God remains in His Own High Place in heaven and does not ever descend to earth. God manifested Himself as the man Jesus, who had a divine nature. Jesus represented God on earth and Jesus perfectly reflected all of God's attributes, so in that sense Jesus was God.
Huh, I must have missed that. If you get a chance pls share where got that....the world was made FOR Jesus as the New Testament claims.