• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Georgia governor signs controversial "heartbeat" abortion bill

Altfish

Veteran Member
I don't know but I assume at the same time Georgia will be providing free contraceptives; increasing sex education in schools and ensuring that mothers who cannot afford unplanned children get full welfare support.
 

Shad

Veteran Member
Abstinence; a great ploy for randy teenagers.

You know adults have sex too right?

I am not against education but there is a point in which I expect even teenagers can grasp basic concepts such as action and consequence. If they can not that is the problem of their parents and perhaps the gene pool
 

Altfish

Veteran Member
You know adults have sex too right?

I am not against education but there is a point in which I expect even teenagers can grasp basic concepts such as action and consequence. If they can not that is the problem of their parents and perhaps the gene pool
Abstinence does not work
 

Shad

Veteran Member
Abstinence does not work

Works for plenty of people with zero issues. You are avoiding my point about teenagers being taught concepts such as action and consequence, and parenting. If a parent does not trust the judgement of their child do not let them off the apron strings
 

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
I don't know but I assume at the same time Georgia will be providing free contraceptives; increasing sex education in schools and ensuring that mothers who cannot afford unplanned children get full welfare support.
Bingo!
As long as the governor of Georgia only supports forcing Georgians to go to Florida or Alabama or somewhere, but won't support sex ed and Planned Parenthood and such evidence based methods of reducing elective abortion, he's just a politician grandstanding.
He likes abortion. He likes having a hot button issue he can use to raise funds and get votes.

He likes abortion. It works for him.
Tom
 

Ellen Brown

Well-Known Member
Who has said we menfolk believe we have more right to converse?
Would you also deny conversation to women who are unable to conceive?
Consider....
- Abortion affects fathers too.
- About half of aborted fetuses are male.
- It's an ethical issue for both men & women who are interested
in law, government, & society.
- In this country, we don't balkanize conversations based upon the
extent to which one is personally affected. Should women not
comment on war because only men register for the draft?
Nah.
Everyone who is interested is welcome.

I'm personally against abortion, especially after 12 weeks. I'll never be faced with the decision.
 

SomeRandom

Still learning to be wise
Staff member
Premium Member
What’s so special about a heartbeat, anyway?
Worms have several. Brain dead people have heartbeats.
Why should that even be a reason to deny an abortion? Is this a medically agreed upon thing?
 

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
Well any Georgians that dislike it can.
Do you think enough anti-feticide Georgians will care enough to support evidence based methods to reduce elective abortions?
Or are they just going to cheer on their political team?

That's what this looks like to me. Republicans lying about what they're getting up to. They want abortion. So they have something to lie about to get money and power.
Tom
 

dianaiad

Well-Known Member
Against it as the data point is arbitrary. The real question we have yet to resolve is personhood and how this idea changes based on subject. Fetus is not a person. An adult is a vegetative state is a person.


That is the question, isn't it? What does 'person' mean? May pro-choice advocates claim that the current definition of 'person' (which doesn't include humans still in the womb) is set in stone, and is the go-to determiner of whether abortion is just dandy.

Yet the term 'person' isn't a scientific or medical fact. It's an assigned value, given to a human (or something else, like a corporation) by the legal system. It changes according to culture. Being a 'person' means that one has the rights of a person. But how is 'personhood' determined?

The thing most important about this bill is that it assigns 'personhood' to unborn humans, at least after the heart starts beating. Once a fetus is assigned personhood, then we have to treat it as if it WERE a person...and all the laws regarding 'self defense,' etc., also come into play.

This protects women who have health issues, and perhaps even rape victims (though I'm not sure how this would help them). It does, certainly protect the right of women who must abort to save their own lives, and it certainly allows abortion in the cases where the fetus is utterly unable to live outside the womb. What it does not do is allow a woman who had consensual sex, knowing that sex produces babies, to kill another human because she went 'oops...' and changed her mind.

I'm pro-choice. Really. It's just that as soon as another human life enters into the picture, the choices are pretty much all made.

Birth control. Use it.
 

Enoch07

It's all a sick freaking joke.
Premium Member
Or are they just going to cheer on their political team?

Real democracy is wonderful in that way.

The war is fought over who has the best ideas.

Dems must not have that great many ideas lately. :shrug:
 

fantome profane

Anti-Woke = Anti-Justice
Premium Member
That is the question, isn't it? What does 'person' mean? May pro-choice advocates claim that the current definition of 'person' (which doesn't include humans still in the womb) is set in stone, and is the go-to determiner of whether abortion is just dandy.
Which is why I like to use the word “individual”.
 
Top