whirlingmerc
Well-Known Member
Being a trickster does not count as proof There is some proof in Josephus account that a guy named Jesus lived, I submit to that but the trickster is not proof.
Proof is proof he was crucified and risen.
On the claims of black magic and deceiver
Historical Jesus - Wikipedia
Other considerations outside Christendom include the possible mentions of Jesus in the Talmud. The Talmud speaks in some detail of the conduct of criminal cases of Israel whose texts were gathered together from 200–500 CE. Bart Ehrman says this material is too late to be of much use. Ehrman explains that "Jesus is never mentioned in the oldest part of the Talmud, the Mishnah, but appears only in the later commentaries of the Gemara."[33]:67-69 Jesus is not mentioned by name, but there is a subtle attack on the virgin birth that refers to the illegitimate son of a Roman soldier "Panthera" (Ehrman says, "In Greek the word for virgin is parthenos"), and a reference to Jesus' miracles as "black magic" learned when he lived in Egypt (as a toddler). Ehrman writes that few contemporary scholars treat this as historica''
sounds like allot of damage control to me
Last edited: