And why do you think so?
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Do you think the Mueller report will be released to the public?
- Thread starter fantome profane
- Start date
esmith
Veteran Member
I think that it will be released to the public consistent with the law.
Can't vote because your selections are non-specific.
https://www.google.com/maps/search/?api=1&query=43.091652,-117.211620
https://www.google.com/maps/search/?api=1&query=43.091652,-117.211620
Can't vote because your selections are non-specific.
https://www.google.com/maps/search/?api=1&query=43.091652,-117.211620
https://www.google.com/maps/search/?api=1&query=43.091652,-117.211620
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Mueller report released to the public?
I doubt there's that much black marker ink in stock.
I doubt there's that much black marker ink in stock.
Shadow Wolf
Certified People sTabber
Eventually it will. I don't know how many redactions or a time line though, though I suspect after Trump's presidency may be a viable prediction.
Agreed.
The fact that there are no more charges, IMV, means that it doesn't matter what is released. It was a fishing expedition and all they caught was catfish.
whirlingmerc
Well-Known Member
Do you believe the law requires the report to be released?
It’s actually pretty short.
I like catfish. Preferably fried.
esmith
Veteran Member
Preferably blackened please
From what I understand, the law requires the report to be provided if it's subpoenaed and wouldn't prevent it from being released if it was, and people with the power to subpoena it have said they intend to subpoena and release it.
There are limits to Congress’ subpoena authority. They can not subpoena things covered by Executive Privilege, classified material, nor contrary to the Special Counsel legislation. Any part of the report they don’t have authority to subpoena would be redacted. They could sue in court, but that would be a long drawn out process and by no means can the results be predicted.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
They may be able to subpoena Mueller to testify. If Trump tries to claim "executive privilege" that could be quickly negated by such a subpoena.
Also I have not seen a case like this where there were not leaks. I would be more than willing to bet that if Trump tries to claim executive privilege that there will be leaks.
No, it wouldn’t. Mueller would be under direction from the Executive Branch to not disclose anything covered by the things I mentioned. It would isn’t a matter of President Trump. It is a matter of precedent. Congress can not violate Executive Privilege via subpoena.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
I would like to hear a lawyer's opinion. Especially one that specialized in that sort of law. But you know that if Trump abused executive privilege in such a manner that would all but guarantee the release of condemning information through leaks. In fact such an act might qualify as obstruction itself. It is going to be interesting to see what tRump does next.
LOL... And they did fry a few... but the let the blow fish get away (those who abused the system in creating the false narrative)
There is this thing nowadays called the internet. Perhaps you have heard of it.
(you’re soaking in it)