• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

World’s Top Religious Leaders Issue Rare Joint Appeal

Hockeycowboy

Witness for Jehovah
Premium Member
Thanks @Hockeycowboy

As you know Baha'is don't believe in a literal Satan or Devil, but see Satan as being a symbol of man's lower nature.

I see positive changes since the nineteenth century and it confirms for me the peace foretold by the Israelite prophets. During the twentieth century there were at least three distinct periods where humanity made significant strides towards being united as one people. The first was after WWI with the formation of the league of nations. Unfortunately the provisions of this first international body was fatally flawed. The American president Woodrow Wilson was a visionary but the other nations were not ready to adopt key aspects of his proposal. This inevitably led to WWII which was arguably the most destructive war in human history.

From the carnage arose the United Nations that managed to overcome many of the deficiencies of the aborted league of nations. Along with this international body, agencies were established for greater economic cooperation and tribunals to adjudicate on international matters. As colonialism lost its grip many nations were free for the first time to have a much greater say as to how to run their affairs.

Unfortunately the cold war followed with a sizeable portion of the worlds population (about one third) opting towards communist inspired governments. This led to unprecedented violations of human rights in some places and economic stagnation for most of these regimes. With the collapse of communism in the late 1980s followed another period of renewed optimism and resurgence in global cooperation.

Unfortunately the period in which we currently live has seen the rise of nationalism, racism and chaos. The mosque shootings in Christchurch reflect that but great unity has emerged in New Zealand as we grapple with the aftermath.

There appears to be many currents of human activity pulling people apart, rather than uniting us. It seems quite likely world affairs will deteriorate further with another global catastrophe in our midst. However, I would anticipate that as with the two world wars and the cold war, a greater level of international cooperation will emerge.
Yep....as I've mentioned -- and posted at length -- before, 1914 was a turning point!
 

dfnj

Well-Known Member
Questions and Comments as you will.

It turns out every major religion has some form of the golden rule:

Buddhism
Treat not others in ways that you yourself would find hurtful.
The Buddha, Udana-Varga 5.18

Christianity
In everything, do to others as you would have them do to you; for this is the law and the prophets.
Jesus, Matthew 7:12

Confucianism
One word which sums up the basis of all good conduct … loving-kindness.
Do not do to others what you do not want done to yourself.
Confucius Analects 15.23

Hinduism
This is the sum of duty: do not do to others what would cause pain if done to you.
Mahabharata 5:1517

Islam
Not one of you truly believes until you wish for others what you wish for yourself.
Book 001, Number 0072:
It is arrested on the authority of Anas b. Malik that the Prophet (may peace and blessings be upon him) observed: one amongst you believes (truly) till one likes for his brother or for his neighbour that which he loves for himself.

Jainism
One should treat all creatures in the world as one would like to be treated.
Mahavira, Sutrakritanga

Judaism
What is hateful to you, do not do to your neighbour. This is the whole
Torah; all the rest is commentary. Go and learn it.
Hillel, Talmud, Shabbath 31a

Native Spirituality
We are as much alive as we keep the earth alive.
Chief Dan George

Sikhism
I am a stranger to no one; and no one is a stranger to me. Indeed, I am a friend to all.
Guru Granth Sahib, p. 1299

Taoism
Regard your neighbour’s gain as your own gain and your neighbour’s loss as your own loss.
Lao Tzu, T’ai Shang Kan Ying P’ien, 213-218

Unitarianism
We affirm and promote respect for the interdependent web of all existence of which we are a part.
Unitarian principle

Zoroastrianism
Do not do unto others whatever is injurious to yourself.
Shayast-na-Shayast 13.29

Baha’i Faith
Lay not on any soul a load that you would not wish to be laid upon you,
and desire not for anyone the things you would not desire for yourself.
Baha’u’llah, Gleanings
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber
And more examples of Christians helping others in need. The problem with prejudice is you only see the World through a single lens of meaning.
I am not failing to see that. However, I do see the potential for humans to not need superstitions and fairy tales in order to do good things, be good people, and behave in pro-social ways. I was also specifically addressing a post implying "true" Christians cannot be murderers. If you want to accuse anyone of wearing blinders, that would be a better place to start.
 

Hockeycowboy

Witness for Jehovah
Premium Member
If we use the Bible as a guideline, it is solely up to god and god alone to decide such a thing.
You think so? Then how does a Christian group apply 1 Corinthians 5? Some 'decide' / 'judge' themselves.

If someone kills, I judge they do not love...at least not their victim. So much for Matthew 5:44, huh?
 

Hockeycowboy

Witness for Jehovah
Premium Member
It turns out every major religion has some form of the golden rule:

Buddhism
Treat not others in ways that you yourself would find hurtful.
The Buddha, Udana-Varga 5.18

Christianity
In everything, do to others as you would have them do to you; for this is the law and the prophets.
Jesus, Matthew 7:12

Confucianism
One word which sums up the basis of all good conduct … loving-kindness.
Do not do to others what you do not want done to yourself.
Confucius Analects 15.23

Hinduism
This is the sum of duty: do not do to others what would cause pain if done to you.
Mahabharata 5:1517

Islam
Not one of you truly believes until you wish for others what you wish for yourself.
Book 001, Number 0072:
It is arrested on the authority of Anas b. Malik that the Prophet (may peace and blessings be upon him) observed: one amongst you believes (truly) till one likes for his brother or for his neighbour that which he loves for himself.

Jainism
One should treat all creatures in the world as one would like to be treated.
Mahavira, Sutrakritanga

Judaism
What is hateful to you, do not do to your neighbour. This is the whole
Torah; all the rest is commentary. Go and learn it.
Hillel, Talmud, Shabbath 31a

Native Spirituality
We are as much alive as we keep the earth alive.
Chief Dan George

Sikhism
I am a stranger to no one; and no one is a stranger to me. Indeed, I am a friend to all.
Guru Granth Sahib, p. 1299

Taoism
Regard your neighbour’s gain as your own gain and your neighbour’s loss as your own loss.
Lao Tzu, T’ai Shang Kan Ying P’ien, 213-218

Unitarianism
We affirm and promote respect for the interdependent web of all existence of which we are a part.
Unitarian principle

Zoroastrianism
Do not do unto others whatever is injurious to yourself.
Shayast-na-Shayast 13.29

Baha’i Faith
Lay not on any soul a load that you would not wish to be laid upon you,
and desire not for anyone the things you would not desire for yourself.
Baha’u’llah, Gleanings
Nice! Thanks for posting this list! I'm putting it in my "notes".
 

dfnj

Well-Known Member
I am not failing to see that. However, I do see the potential for humans to not need superstitions and fairy tales in order to do good things, be good people, and behave in pro-social ways. I was also specifically addressing a post implying "true" Christians cannot be murderers. If you want to accuse anyone of wearing blinders, that would be a better place to start.

I would love to see superstitions and fairy tales go away. It's just that we do not live in a clockwork Universe. Unless you solve the problem of how all the energy in the Universe was created in the first place, which is a violation of the law of conservation of energy, then I will stick with superstition. I am eagerly awaiting your solution.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber
You think so? Then how does a Christian group apply 1 Corinthians 5? Some 'decide' / 'judge' themselves.

If someone kills, I judge they do not love...at least not their victim. So much for Matthew 5:44, huh?
Why would a Christian group put the words of Paul above the words of Jesus, who said things such as "let he who is without sin cast the first stone" and "judge not lest ye be judged yourself." For the standards you measure one's "Christianness" by shall be measured to you. You will be judged by the judgements you pronounce. And even James asks who are you to judge your neighbor?
 

Hockeycowboy

Witness for Jehovah
Premium Member
Why would a Christian group put the words of Paul above the words of Jesus, who said things such as "let he who is without sin cast the first stone" and "judge not lest ye be judged yourself." For the standards you measure one's "Christianness" by shall be measured to you. You will be judged by the judgements you pronounce. And even James asks who are you to judge your neighbor?
Matthew 23... sorry, but Jesus judged.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber
Matthew 23... sorry, but Jesus judged.
And as the story goes Jesus wasn't quite the average ordinary homo sapiens. Being god's son and all, or god himself depending on your interpretation, he had some ground of authority to speak on, and it's not like god himself ever followed "thou shalt not kill" anyways.
 

atanu

Member
Premium Member

Religion is often viewed as a force that sows divisions between people. But the world’s most prominent religious leaders have come together to present a different vision of how faith can work in the world.

Questions and Comments as you will.

My opinion.

The samsara, both the waking and dream worlds, are by nature divisive and full of strife, pain, and fear. It is natural that waves in ocean clash and destroy each other. But that does not destroy the water. We may be able to see an ocean with its waves as a play of the water. Similarly, in the multiform world, the clashes are inevitable. But it is really a play of one without a second reality.

The strife and pain will always be there at ego level, till realisation that an 'ego-mind-body' has no reality of its own.

The point is: In my opinion, such coming together of religious leaders may act as palliative. Yet this itself is part of the naturally divisive mythic world and thus cannot yield any lasting peace. Only the realisation of the non dual reality that runs through all phenomena can give peace to one.

...
 

danieldemol

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Most everyone wants peace, but it's always just out of reach.... it seems 'their rights' come first.
Their fundamental human rights do come first and there will never be outer peace until the fundamental rights of all human beings are respected
 

danieldemol

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Only the realisation of the non dual reality that runs through all phenomena can give peace to one.

...
My opinion is that inner peace can be achieved by striving to actualise human virtues without any such “realisation”
 

Shantanu

Well-Known Member
My opinion.

The samsara, both the waking and dream worlds, are by nature divisive and full of strife, pain, and fear. It is natural that waves in ocean clash and destroy each other. But that does not destroy the water. We may be able to see an ocean with its waves as a play of the water. Similarly, in the multiform world, the clashes are inevitable. But it is really a play of one without a second reality.

The strife and pain will always be there at ego level, till realisation that an 'ego-mind-body' has no reality of its own.

The point is: In my opinion, such coming together of religious leaders may act as palliative. Yet this itself is part of the naturally divisive mythic world and thus cannot yield any lasting peace. Only the realisation of the non dual reality that runs through all phenomena can give peace to one.

...
One still needs to live in this world and deal with ones problems so that one has a peaceful life with an adquate source of income and freedom from persecution.
 

Shantanu

Well-Known Member
I really wanted to share this as its so easy to succumb to negativity and despair in the face of terrorist acts such as the one in Christchurch. Make friends with peoples of different faiths is the message. So simple yet so powerful.

Religion is often viewed as a force that sows divisions between people. But the world’s most prominent religious leaders have come together to present a different vision of how faith can work in the world.


In a rare move, major religious leaders ― from Pope Francis to the Dalai Lama ― issued a joint appeal Wednesday asking people to follow a simple bit of advice: Make friends with people of other faiths.



World’s Top Religious Leaders Issue Rare Joint Appeal | HuffPost

Can events such as the one in Christchurch really lead to a positive shift in the way people act towards each other?

Questions and Comments as you will.
The religions are all one one side and the real fight is against States organised criminalty in terms of persecution of believers.
 

Mindmaster

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Can events such as the one in Christchurch really lead to a positive shift in the way people act towards each other?

Questions and Comments as you will.

Nope, they'll all go back to hating each others guts as soon as they manage to get the blood off the floor of the mosque. The hypocrisy, of course, regarding the whole situation, is that we must suddenly worry about this and modify our behavior when it happens to a venue of Islam. This is no outrage at all when the Muslims or the Jews are doing far worse every day -- no one even cares. The irony isn't lost on me at all.

These calls of peace are nothing really other than an attempt to placate the masses and make it seem like these leaders have any influence at all with their base. They really do not, because their holy books say, "kill them all." Ultimately, if people have to pick between what the Imam, Rabbi, and Priest says and God they're going with the latter. Fundamentally, none of these religions are peaceful or capable of such peace as the underpinning base of the religion comes from a violent place. "Command and conquer everyone else" is a valid interpretation of all of them.
 
Top