• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

I have some deep question about God, help!

Maximilian

Energetic proclaimer of Jehovah God's Kingdom.
Is that a question or a statement? If it is a statement, that is the funniest thing I have heard all year, but it is only February. :rolleyes:

"A question mark (?) . . . indicate{s} a direct question when placed at the end of a sentence." -What Are the 14 Punctuation Marks in English Grammar? (Bracket mine)

"The period (.) is placed at the end of declarative sentences, statements thought to be complete and after many abbreviations." -What Are the 14 Punctuation Marks in English Grammar?
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
"A question mark (?) . . . indicate{s} a direct question when placed at the end of a sentence." -What Are the 14 Punctuation Marks in English Grammar? (Bracket mine)

"The period (.) is placed at the end of declarative sentences, statements thought to be complete and after many abbreviations." -What Are the 14 Punctuation Marks in English Grammar?
I do not need your edification. You have been very indirect ever since you came to this forum, and I am not the only one who noticed that. So that is why I asked if it was a question or a statement. I just answered your question -- directly.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
I'm glad :)

Since you don't worship the god of ISIS, Al-Qaeda, the KKK, Satanistst, etc., etc., which god, then, do you worship?
I think I already posted this to you, but I post a lot of posts to a lot of people so forgive me if I am repetitive.

Baha'is believe there is only one God. We worship the one true God, the God of the Holy Bible and the God who has revealed all the other major religions since the beginning of human history.

“Regard thou the one true God as One Who is apart from, and immeasurably exalted above, all created things. The whole universe reflecteth His glory, while He is Himself independent of, and transcendeth His creatures. This is the true meaning of Divine unity. He Who is the Eternal Truth is the one Power Who exerciseth undisputed sovereignty over the world of being, Whose image is reflected in the mirror of the entire creation. All existence is dependent upon Him, and from Him is derived the source of the sustenance of all things. This is what is meant by Divine unity; this is its fundamental principle.” Gleanings From the Writings of Bahá’u’lláh, p. 167
 

Maximilian

Energetic proclaimer of Jehovah God's Kingdom.
We worship the one true God, the God of the Holy Bible

DZhoETjVMAAWvUf.jpg


So you worship Jehovah God, yes?
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
Sure, but now you seem to have decided that it all logically fits together and can't seem to step outside of the narrative.
Why would I want to, if it all logically fits together?
Well, for example, the Roman gods had quite a good innings and let's not forget that the Bahá'í faith hasn't been around all that long yet.
But do those mythical Gods have great world religions they are based upon?

You cannot expect the Baha’i Faith to have what the older religions have because it is only about 150 years old. It takes time for any new religion to become known and established.
Perhaps you misunderstand. I'm saying that the world's faiths are all exactly in their original form, as their founders intended, what I'm questioning is your claims about what the original forms were like (not contradictory and shouldn't have led to all the bad consequences that they did lead to).
None of the originally revealed religions contradicted each other, since they all had the same spiritual verities. The social teachings and laws were different because society changes over time and needs new social teachings and laws. Each new Messenger revealed a new message that was pertinent to the age in which it was revealed, and it was the remedy that was needed for that age, which can never be the same as was needed in a previous age. The message changes over time because humanity needs a new message in every age.

The message of Baha’u’llah was the oneness of mankind and world unity. That message would not have been appropriate for former ages because humanity was not spiritually mature enough for world unity and there would have been no way to have world unity back then because the world did not have mass communications as we do now.

Jesus foresaw and predicted that in the future all of humanity would be brought into one fold; this verse refers to the oneness of mankind.

John 10:16 And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd.

But Jesus knew that humanity was not yet ready to hear about the oneness of mankind and world unity and that is why He said:

John 16:12-13 I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now. Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come.

Baha’u’llah was the Spirit of truth who came to establish the oneness of mankind and world unity.
I have two main problems with what you say.

The first is common to all theistic beliefs and is just the lack of any objective reason to take the idea of any sort of god seriously. This doesn't mean that there cannot possibly be any sort of god, but it does mean that it is more rational to assume that there isn't.
What do you mean by “objective reason?” Do you mean objective proof that God exists such as being able to locate God with a GPS tracker, or for God to show up on earth and reveal Himself? If so, I can give you explanations as to why that is not possible, but for now, onto your second point...
The second is that I can see no way to reconcile the idea of a just and fair (omnipotent, omniscient) god, who has an important, if not vital, message for its creation, with the world as it is. The world is full of squabbling religions and there seems to be nothing much to make one stand out as authentic. Your only answers to this seem to be, that god knows best (which presupposes there is a god), it has something with free will (which I don't think stands up to logic), or that we are required to go looking in detail at them all (which doesn't seem consistent with fairness and rationality).
You can only understand why the world is the way it is if to accept that we have free will, so people choose to hang onto their older religions and reject the new religion that has the answers, the religion which explains why all the squabbling has existed and still exists.

I understand that from your perspective you have no reason to look at just one religion and not the others, but the fact remains that this is your best course of action. Of course, I am going to say this because I am a Baha’i, but I am trying to save you a lot of unnecessary work. Baha’u’llah did not enjoin us to look at all the older religions because that would have been too much for most people to do, given the time constraints of modern society, but also He said not to for two reasons. First, we would never be able to sort them all out because the messages were never clear in the first place.

“Please God thou wilt turn thine eyes towards the Most Great Revelation, and entirely disregard these conflicting tales and traditions.” Gleanings From the Writings of Bahá’u’lláh, pp. 174-175

Secondly, the older religions have all been corrupted my man, so they are no longer the original Truth from God:

“This is the Day when the loved ones of God should keep their eyes directed towards His Manifestation, and fasten them upon whatsoever that Manifestation may be pleased to reveal. Certain traditions of bygone ages rest on no foundations whatever, while the notions entertained by past generations, and which they have recorded in their books, have, for the most part, been influenced by the desires of a corrupt inclination. Thou dost witness how most of the commentaries and interpretations of the words of God, now current amongst men, are devoid of truth. Their falsity hath, in some cases, been exposed when the intervening veils were rent asunder. They themselves have acknowledged their failure in apprehending the meaning of any of the words of God.” Gleanings From the Writings of Bahá’u’lláh, pp. 171-172
The idea of trying to unify most of the religions is obviously attractive but nothing you've said seems to be more than wishful thinking.
It seems like wishful thinking to most people because it is a long way off into the future, but if you really understood the Baha’i Faith you would know why it is not only possible but inevitable. Moreover religious unity was prophesied in the Bible and other religions, so it fits together with the Baha’i Faith hand in glove. Isaiah foresaw it in Isaiah 11:6-9 and Jesus predicted it in John 10:16:

Isaiah 11:6-9 The wolf also shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the kid; and the calf and the young lion and the fatling together; and a little child shall lead them. And the cow and the bear shall feed; their young ones shall lie down together: and the lion shall eat straw like the ox.And the sucking child shall play on the hole of the asp, and the weaned child shall put his hand on the cockatrice' den. They shall not hurt nor destroy in all my holy mountain: for the earth shall be full of the knowledge of the Lord, as the waters cover the sea.

John 10:16 And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd.

What this means to a Baha’i is that In the future diverse religions and races will become comrades, friends and companions. The contentions of races, the differences of religions, and the barriers between nations will be completely removed, and all will attain perfect union and reconciliation. Eventually, there will be only one religion, the religion of God.
The idea that there were pristine versions that have been corrupted seems based on faith rather than evidence or reasoning (unless you assume a god to begin with).
We do have to accept on faith that there were pristine versions, but there is some evidence that supports this because some of the pristine versions do exist in the form of scriptures, even though their authenticity cannot be verified, as is the case for the scriptures of Baha’u’llah and to a lesser extent Muhammad. Yes, you do have to assume a God exists, at least as a premise even if you do not yet accept it as a conclusion.
I don't know exactly what would convince me to change my mind, however, if there is an omnipotent and omniscient god, then one has to assume that it does know but is choosing not to convince me of its authenticity and hence is denying me a free choice as to my reaction to it...
You are right that God knows exactly what is in your mind, but God never tries to convince anyone of anything because God wants us to use our innate abilities to discover His Truth for ourselves and our free will to decide to accept it or not. That might not seem fair to you but that does not mean it is not fair; only if you understand why God works this way will you understand why it is fair.

I do not want to overload you with any more information right now, but if you want to hang in here I can explain anything to you want to know. I have been explaining these things to atheists for five years so I pretty much know how to explain them. I have also been getting the same objections from atheists for five years so I understand how they feel and why they feel that way.

Because of these objections most atheists will not become believers but that is not true across the board, because some Baha’is were formerly atheists. But the one thing all of them had in common was sincerity and a desire to believe in God; without that motivation there is no reason why they would make the necessary effort. Another thing they had in common was a sense of humility because without that you are dead in the water. It is just my sense about you that you have these characteristics, which I have not encountered very often. I have to say it is quite refreshing. :)
 

ratiocinator

Lightly seared on the reality grill.
Why would I want to, if it all logically fits together?

In one sense, you're right, if it makes you happy and it does no harm, go for it. On the other, and especially when talking to atheists, you don't seem to get that the "logical sense" it makes is self-referential. There are no obvious premisses. It makes a kind of internal sense, so long as you never question its basis. You also seem to have papered over the obvious cracks by believing that "god knows best".

But do those mythical Gods have great world religions they are based upon?

They used to have.

None of the originally revealed religions contradicted each other, since they all had the same spiritual verities.

But you've already admitted that the "originally revealed religions" are not available to us - so this is a statement of faith. It cannot be a part of any evidence for, or argument for, a god

What do you mean by “objective reason?” Do you mean objective proof that God exists such as being able to locate God with a GPS tracker, or for God to show up on earth and reveal Himself?

I mean something that is properly intersubjectively verifiable. Something that would be true if and only if there is a good chance that a (specific) god exists. Something that doesn't depend on a person's beliefs, attitudes, or any faith.

As I said before, I really don't see why a just and fair god, with an important message, wouldn't make itself and its message plain to everybody - and the absence of such a message seems to be strong objective evidence that there is no such god.

People often say that there can't be scientific or material evidence for god. I don't quite see why a god couldn't or wouldn't provide such evidence, but, given that it can't or won't, we then have the problem of what other methodology can we use to assess claims of this nature? How do we distinguish a probably true claim about god(s) or other 'supernatural' claim from probably false claims? How, in short, do we tell the difference between these claims and just guessing?

You are right that God knows exactly what is in your mind, but God never tries to convince anyone of anything because God wants us to use our innate abilities to discover His Truth for ourselves and our free will to decide to accept it or not.

My innate abilities are currently telling me that there is probably no god and, even more probably (even if there is a god), no message to respond to.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
In one sense, you're right, if it makes you happy and it does no harm, go for it.
When did I ever say it makes me happy? I am not that happy with all this responsibility. It would be a lot easier to be an atheist, hands down.
On the other, and especially when talking to atheists, you don't seem to get that the "logical sense" it makes is self-referential. There are no obvious premises.
I never said the premises were obvious, but a discussion has to start somewhere.
It makes a kind of internal sense, so long as you never question its basis.
You should question its basis; that is why you have a logical mind.
You also seem to have papered over the obvious cracks by believing that "god knows best".
If God exists God is All-Knowing so God knows best. That is logic 101.
They used to have.
But they did not endure, and for good reason; that had no real Messengers of God who revealed those religions.
But you've already admitted that the "originally revealed religions" are not available to us - so this is a statement of faith. It cannot be a part of any evidence for, or argument for, a god.
They are available in some form, especially the Bible and the Qur’an, so we can read those scriptures and see that the spiritual verities are no different from those of the Baha’i Faith.
I mean something that is properly intersubjectively verifiable. Something that would be true if and only if there is a good chance that a (specific) god exists. Something that doesn't depend on a person's beliefs, attitudes, or any faith.
There is no such thing because God did not provide it. God is in charge of the evidence room and we get what He decides to give us since God alone is All-Powerful.

As I said before, I really don't see why a just and fair god, with an important message, wouldn't make itself and its message plain to everybody - and the absence of such a message seems to be strong objective evidence that there is no such god.

God did make His message clear to everybody, since the Revelation of Baha’u’llah is as clear as the noonday sun. The caveat is free will; God is not going the MAKE it clear to anyone, they have to investigate until it becomes clear to them.

God could make it clear to everyone but I think I already explained why God does not make it clear to everyone. Below I will cite the appropriate passage and the detailed explanation of what it means.

There is a REASON God does not tell everyone He exists

Baha’u’llah wrote that God could have made all men one people. In the context of the passage below, it means that God could have made all people believers. The passage goes on to say why God didn’t do that... In short, God wants us to do our own homework and come to our own conclusions

“He Who is the Day Spring of Truth is, no doubt, fully capable of rescuing from such remoteness wayward souls and of causing them to draw nigh unto His court and attain His Presence. “If God had pleased He had surely made all men one people.” His purpose, however, is to enable the pure in spirit and the detached in heart to ascend, by virtue of their own innate powers, unto the shores of the Most Great Ocean, that thereby they who seek the Beauty of the All-Glorious may be distinguished and separated from the wayward and perverse. Thus hath it been ordained by the all-glorious and resplendent Pen…” Gleanings From the Writings of Bahá’u’lláh, p. 71

According to this passage, is that God wants everyone to search for Him and determine if He exists by using their own innate intelligence and applying their free will. God wants those who are sincere and truly search for Him to believe in Him. God wants to distinguish those people from the others who are not sincere, those who are unwilling to put forth any effort.

This is related to free will. Everyone has free will so it is a level playing field. Everyone can look at Baha’u’llah if they choose to do so... However, that requires willingness and effort, just like anything in life... God wants us to make a sincere effort, and thereby prove our sincerity to ourselves; not to Him, because god already knows who is sincere and not.
People often say that there can't be scientific or material evidence for god. I don't quite see why a god couldn't or wouldn't provide such evidence, but, given that it can't or won't, we then have the problem of what other methodology can we use to assess claims of this nature? How do we distinguish a probably true claim about god(s) or other 'supernatural' claim from probably false claims? How, in short, do we tell the difference between these claims and just guessing?
All I can say is that we need to investigate the claims, and in the Baha’i Faith we call that independent investigation of truth.

“The first principle Baha’u’llah urged was the independent investigation of truth. “Each individual,” He said, “is following the faith of his ancestors who themselves are lost in the maze of tradition. Reality is steeped in dogmas and doctrines. If each investigate for himself, he will find that Reality is one; does not admit of multiplicity; is not divisible. All will find the same foundation and all will be at peace.” – Abdu’l-Baha, Star of the West, Volume 3, p. 5.

“Bahá’u’lláh asked no one to accept His statements and His tokens blindly. On the contrary, He put in the very forefront of His teachings emphatic warnings against blind acceptance of authority, and urged all to open their eyes and ears, and use their own judgement, independently and fearlessly, in order to ascertain the truth. He enjoined the fullest investigation and never concealed Himself, offering, as the supreme proofs of His Prophethood, His words and works and their effects in transforming the lives and characters of men.”Bahá’u’lláh and the New Era, p. 8

“What does it mean to investigate reality? It means that man must forget all hearsay and examine truth himself, for he does not know whether statements he hears are in accordance with reality or not. Wherever he finds truth or reality, he must hold to it, forsaking, discarding all else; for outside of reality there is naught but superstition and imagination.” – Abdu’l-Baha, The Promulgation of Universal Peace, p. 62.
My innate abilities are currently telling me that there is probably no god and, even more probably (even if there is a god), no message to respond to.
There is no reason what you should not trust your own innate abilities but the wise man does the research before he comes to the conclusion. I am not saying that you will come to the same conclusions I have but you will never know if you do not look.

“If a man were to declare, ‘There is a lamp in the next room which gives no light’, one hearer might be satisfied with his report, but a wiser man goes into the room to judge for himself, and behold, when he finds the light shining brilliantly in the lamp, he knows the truth!” Paris Talks, p. 103
 

ratiocinator

Lightly seared on the reality grill.
I never said the premises were obvious, but a discussion has to start somewhere.

So what do you think is the starting point?

If God exists God is All-Knowing so God knows best. That is logic 101.

Sure, given the antecedent, we'd expect it to be true, but the practical upshot is that, if you find something that seems inconsistent or illogical, then you can just ignore it. In practice, it's an invitation to ignore logic.

There is no such thing because God did not provide it. God is in charge of the evidence room and we get what He decides to give us since God alone is All-Powerful.

Then I don't see how this god expects rational people to believe it exists.

God did make His message clear to everybody, since the Revelation of Baha’u’llah is as clear as the noonday sun.

It isn't clear to me. As I said before, it might be unambiguous (unlike, most faiths) but that doesn't make it clearly a message from the real god.

The caveat is free will; God is not going the MAKE it clear to anyone, they have to investigate until it becomes clear to them.

As I said before, I have serious logical problems with free will in relation to any omni- god, I simply don't think it makes sense. Even if I ignore that, unless the message is made clearly genuine to everybody, I don't think any choice can count as free.

According to this passage, is that God wants everyone to search for Him and determine if He exists by using their own innate intelligence and applying their free will. God wants those who are sincere and truly search for Him to believe in Him. God wants to distinguish those people from the others who are not sincere, those who are unwilling to put forth any effort.

This, together with the fact that I see no prima facie case that there is any god to search for, and still less reason to think that a message from one may be hidden amongst the religions of the world, leads me to conclude that, if your statement is true, then your god is not being fair and just.

I'm not sure if there is much more to say. We do seem to be going round the same points now. Humans have a limited amount of time in their lives and all have different interests and inclinations. I don't think it would be fair of a god to expect the specific sort of searching you are suggesting is needed, from everyone. And I don't see how people can possibly make a 'free choice' in the matter unless there are clear and objective reasons to think the choice is a real one.
 

nPeace

Veteran Member
I understand what you are saying, I do not agree. But we don’t have to agree, that’s cool
Of course, if everyone agreed, the world would be paradise, or empty of life, depending on what it is everyone agreed on, :D but admittedly, the reasons we often disagree is not that we don't have reasons to agree, but often.... in most cases, I find it's a matter of us not wanting to agree. To give an example....
I find that when most Atheist I have come in contact with on these forums, often cite passages in the Bible to criticize, but when a simple explanation is given, that is both logical, and reasonable, that has no effect on the Atheist's outlook.

So it seems to me that no amount of reason, will ever convince one who sets their mind against something - not because it is shown to be bad, but because, imo, it goes against their desired choice.

I believe that if an answer was given that clears up every argument raised, against the Bible, some would keep finding something to raise an argument against.
This is what the Bible itself says.

One of my questions to you, went like this... Can I ask a question... If the earth is a flat plate, how does it have four corners?
Perhaps you thought I wasn't really serious about an answer, but I was. I posed the question, because I really wanted to hear your response to it, but that's okay. It is past.

However I will still share this with you. If this were just one issue some Atheist had with the Bible, I am quite sure that they would still be Atheist even after this was put to them.
Can you see the four corners? ;)

Four_-Corners_web.jpg


Several cosmological and mythological systems portray four corners of the world or four quarters of the world corresponding approximately to the four points of the compass (or the two solstices and two equinoxes).

Black-ops in all four corners of the globe
Somewhere on this planet an American commando is carrying out a mission. ... Without the knowledge of the American public, a secret force within the U.S. military is undertaking operations in a majority of the world’s countries. This new Pentagon power elite is waging a global war whose size and scope has never been revealed, until now.

Seeds of Fortune Sown in Four Corners of the Globe
Airborne Technologies is Expanding to the Four Corners of the Globe


the four corners of the world or the four corners of the earth
You can use the four corners of the world or the four corners of the earth to mean all the different parts of the world, especially the parts that are the furthest away from you.
A foreign correspondent makes his friends in all four corners of the world. Italy has sent 5,000 soldiers to the four corners of the earth to play their part in peace-keeping operations. Note: Other nouns referring to areas of land can be used instead of world or earth. Young people came from the four corners of the nation in search of new ideas.

Meaning of all/the four corners of the world/earth in English
many different parts of the world:
She had invited relatives from the four corners of the world to her 80th birthday party.

From Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English
the four corners of the Earth/world
literary places or countries that are very far away from each other
People from the four corners of the world have come to Ontario to make it their home.

If you were to go to Christian websites, for example jw.org, and researched this information, you would have seen the explanation clearly stated, as to the meaning of four, as used in the Bible, and what was meant by "four corners of the earth".
For a Christian to explain that, often it would be scoffed at, but when the world (another expression the Bible uses that would be scoffed at if Christians alone used it) - when the world uses the expression, it becomes, all well and good. Is that not the picture we see? Cute, isn't it? :)

However, we know where it's at, so as you said, not in these words, but we make our choice to believe or not believe, to agree or disagree. It's all well and good. :sunglasses:
 

JChnsc19

Member
Of course, if everyone agreed, the world would be paradise, or empty of life, depending on what it is everyone agreed on, :D but admittedly, the reasons we often disagree is not that we don't have reasons to agree, but often.... in most cases, I find it's a matter of us not wanting to agree. To give an example....
I find that when most Atheist I have come in contact with on these forums, often cite passages in the Bible to criticize, but when a simple explanation is given, that is both logical, and reasonable, that has no effect on the Atheist's outlook.

So it seems to me that no amount of reason, will ever convince one who sets their mind against something - not because it is shown to be bad, but because, imo, it goes against their desired choice.

I believe that if an answer was given that clears up every argument raised, against the Bible, some would keep finding something to raise an argument against.
This is what the Bible itself says.

One of my questions to you, went like this... Can I ask a question... If the earth is a flat plate, how does it have four corners?
Perhaps you thought I wasn't really serious about an answer, but I was. I posed the question, because I really wanted to hear your response to it, but that's okay. It is past.

However I will still share this with you. If this were just one issue some Atheist had with the Bible, I am quite sure that they would still be Atheist even after this was put to them.
Can you see the four corners? ;)

Four_-Corners_web.jpg


Several cosmological and mythological systems portray four corners of the world or four quarters of the world corresponding approximately to the four points of the compass (or the two solstices and two equinoxes).

Black-ops in all four corners of the globe
Somewhere on this planet an American commando is carrying out a mission. ... Without the knowledge of the American public, a secret force within the U.S. military is undertaking operations in a majority of the world’s countries. This new Pentagon power elite is waging a global war whose size and scope has never been revealed, until now.

Seeds of Fortune Sown in Four Corners of the Globe
Airborne Technologies is Expanding to the Four Corners of the Globe


the four corners of the world or the four corners of the earth
You can use the four corners of the world or the four corners of the earth to mean all the different parts of the world, especially the parts that are the furthest away from you.
A foreign correspondent makes his friends in all four corners of the world. Italy has sent 5,000 soldiers to the four corners of the earth to play their part in peace-keeping operations. Note: Other nouns referring to areas of land can be used instead of world or earth. Young people came from the four corners of the nation in search of new ideas.

Meaning of all/the four corners of the world/earth in English
many different parts of the world:
She had invited relatives from the four corners of the world to her 80th birthday party.

From Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English
the four corners of the Earth/world
literary places or countries that are very far away from each other
People from the four corners of the world have come to Ontario to make it their home.

If you were to go to Christian websites, for example jw.org, and researched this information, you would have seen the explanation clearly stated, as to the meaning of four, as used in the Bible, and what was meant by "four corners of the earth".
For a Christian to explain that, often it would be scoffed at, but when the world (another expression the Bible uses that would be scoffed at if Christians alone used it) - when the world uses the expression, it becomes, all well and good. Is that not the picture we see? Cute, isn't it? :)

However, we know where it's at, so as you said, not in these words, but we make our choice to believe or not believe, to agree or disagree. It's all well and good. :sunglasses:
I definitely don’t choose what I believe though.
 
Last edited:

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
So what do you think is the starting point?
Wherever you are at.
Sure, given the antecedent, we'd expect it to be true, but the practical upshot is that, if you find something that seems inconsistent or illogical, then you can just ignore it. In practice, it's an invitation to ignore logic.
I would think that if you find something that seems inconsistent or illogical, then you might want to ask why it seems that way, before you ignore it.
Then I don't see how this god expects rational people to believe it exists.
What is irrational about accepting the only evidence God provides? Rationally speaking, how could you get any evidence other than what God chooses to provide? That seems like a take it or leave it situation to me.
It isn't clear to me. As I said before, it might be unambiguous (unlike, most faiths) but that doesn't make it clearly a message from the real god.
I can certainly understand your apprehension concerning that. Nobody should believe a claim that a message was from God without scrutinizing it thoroughly. Even after that, they might not believe it, but at least there would be a chance.
As I said before, I have serious logical problems with free will in relation to any omni- god, I simply don't think it makes sense.
Why doesn’t it make sense? Why couldn’t an omni-god choose to give humans free will?
Even if I ignore that, unless the message is made clearly genuine to everybody, I don't think any choice can count as free.
I am not sure what you mean. The message has to be clear and it has to be accessible to everyone, but if God made it clear to everyone then they would not be have to clarify it for themselves because God would be clarifying it for them. God wants us to use our own innate abilities to try to understand it and then choose to believe it or not, based upon our own understanding. A free choice is when one can choose to believe in the message or not so if God intervenes it is not a free choice anymore.
This, together with the fact that I see no prima facie case that there is any god to search for, and still less reason to think that a message from one may be hidden amongst the religions of the world, leads me to conclude that, if your statement is true, then your god is not being fair and just.
You have to at least entertain the possibility that there might be a reason for a God to exist and send Messengers of God in order to have a discussion about it. So hypothetically speaking, if there is a God and there are messages in the religions of the world, why would it be unfair or unjust for that God to expect us to search for the message if we want it?
I'm not sure if there is much more to say. We do seem to be going round the same points now. Humans have a limited amount of time in their lives and all have different interests and inclinations. I don't think it would be fair of a god to expect the specific sort of searching you are suggesting is needed, from everyone.
The thing is that it does not seem to be that difficult for most people, because 93% of people in the world believe in God, mostly without this kind of extensive searching. For whatever reason most people can accept that religions are revealed by God through various Messengers so it is that as difficult as you make it sound. Why are atheists so different?
And I don't see how people can possibly make a 'free choice' in the matter unless there are clear and objective reasons to think the choice is a real one.
I do not know what you mean by objective reasons, do you mean objective evidence? There is objective evidence that indicates that Baha'u'llah was a Messenger of God, but there is no actual proof because nobody can prove that as a fact.
 

ManSinha

Well-Known Member
All of this is unprecedented. No other religion in history has ever had a written Covenant between the Messenger and His followers.

Wrong!

Please do not make sweeping claims about other religions if you have not studied them and going by your statements on here - it is clear that your expertise is limited to the Baha'i faith
 
Last edited:

ratiocinator

Lightly seared on the reality grill.
What is irrational about accepting the only evidence God provides? Rationally speaking, how could you get any evidence other than what God chooses to provide? That seems like a take it or leave it situation to me.

If a god has chosen not to provide reasonable evidence, then it can't expect reasonable people to believe it.

Why doesn’t it make sense? Why couldn’t an omni-god choose to give humans free will?

This risks going off into philosophical discussion but briefly: the notion of "free will" in the sense most people think of it, and in any way that it makes sense with respect to an omni-god, is logically incoherent. Things (even choices) have to happen for reasons unless they involve randomness. Minds must be deterministic systems (unless there genuine randomness). The only kind of free will that makes logical sense is compatibilism (which makes no sense to an omni-god).

The message has to be clear and it has to be accessible to everyone, but if God made it clear to everyone then they would not be have to clarify it for themselves because God would be clarifying it for them.

What's wrong with that?

A free choice is when one can choose to believe in the message or not so if God intervenes it is not a free choice anymore.

Even without the problems of free will I mentioned above - you can't choose your beliefs. You either find something convincing or you don't, it's not the sort of thing people just decide. This is not a free choice. A genuine choice must be an informed choice.

So hypothetically speaking, if there is a God and there are messages in the religions of the world, why would it be unfair or unjust for that God to expect us to search for the message if we want it?

As I said, because there is no prima facie case that there is any god to search for, let alone one that has (illogically and unfairly, as far as I can see) hidden a message amongst the religions.

The thing is that it does not seem to be that difficult for most people, because 93% of people in the world believe in God, mostly without this kind of extensive searching.

Don't know where you got the 93% from, a quick google suggests 84% affiliated to a religion. However, that is hardly relevant because whatever percentage do not believe in "God". There is no one god-idea. Starting from the point of view of deciding if there is a god, all we have to go on are the god-ideas in the minds of people, and there are many of them. Whichever one we look at, most people in the world think it is wrong - and yes, that includes your god, which is just another god-idea that most people disagree with. You may want to claim that everyone really believes in your god, but actually their god-ideas are different - and it's only the god-ideas an unbeliever has to go on.
 

syo

Well-Known Member
why is there a hell?
God is holy Fire. When we die, our souls join God. Now, God is Fire so our souls are merged in the holy Fire. the virtuous souls are compatible with the holy Fire, and they feel Heaven. The sinful souls are incompatible with the Holy Fire and they are exterminated by the holy Fire. There is no torture, but annihilation of the incompatible sinful souls.
 

syo

Well-Known Member
why do people constantly die needlessly and innocently?
The Orthodox say that God chooses our times of death. He commands the souls who are to join him in heaven. Life on Earth is just a test for heaven.
 
Top