• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Article: Biblical literalism and perceptions of History as a science

Orbit

I'm a planet
You can find the article here: SAGE Journals: Your gateway to world-class journal research

The abstract: Recent work on religious conservatives frequently finds biblical literalism to have a negative influence on individuals’ attitudes toward science. We present a science-related issue for which biblical literalism seems, at least on the surface, to have a more positive influence. Specifically, individuals expressing a literalist view of the Bible are more likely than those who view the Bible as a book of fables to say that the field of history is scientific. This pattern remains even after accounting for a variety of other measures of individuals’ religion, scientific attitudes, and demographics. We discuss this pattern in the context of historical and contemporary connections between the Bible, history, and science among those coming from a literalist worldview.

I wonder if the researchers realized that literalists tend to view the Bible as a history book, thus explaining their findings. This is where qualitative work is needed (interview studies) to get at the "why" behind the survey responses.
 

sun rise

The world is on fire
Premium Member
Too often a finding is lacking good detail. Your "why" question is a great example of that.
 

Skwim

Veteran Member
You can find the article here: SAGE Journals: Your gateway to world-class journal research

The abstract: Recent work on religious conservatives frequently finds biblical literalism to have a negative influence on individuals’ attitudes toward science. We present a science-related issue for which biblical literalism seems, at least on the surface, to have a more positive influence. Specifically, individuals expressing a literalist view of the Bible are more likely than those who view the Bible as a book of fables to say that the field of history is scientific. This pattern remains even after accounting for a variety of other measures of individuals’ religion, scientific attitudes, and demographics. We discuss this pattern in the context of historical and contemporary connections between the Bible, history, and science among those coming from a literalist worldview.

I wonder if the researchers realized that literalists tend to view the Bible as a history book, thus explaining their findings. This is where qualitative work is needed (interview studies) to get at the "why" behind the survey responses.
I can easily see why religious conservatives want to regard the field of history as scientific. Considering the tremendous veracity science has established for itself over the years, what better way to anoint biblical literalism with that veracity than to bring its only basis, historical writings, under the umbrella of science.

To which I can only say,
tongue-stuck-out-smiley-emoticon.gif
Try again.

.
 
Top