Are you advocating permanency of all laws? That both the country and the world is unchanged? In any case...perhaps you'll find this interesting;
Gun Control Is as Old as the Old West | History | Smithsonian
There is nothing in what you quoted of my remarks that could possibly lead someone to reasonably arrive at what you ask through your personal inference.
Gun control laws aren't about guns. They're about control.
Every nation where there are strict gun control laws, and even in America in the city of Chicago as a prime example, the law abiding are disarmed. While the non-law abiding criminal element remain an armed threat.
Years ago Rosie O'Donnell , a failed comedian who was given a talk show that failed every time she was given a new chance at having a talk show, was staunchly anti-gun. She'd invite celebrities on who she knew were pro-gun so as to debate them and beat them down with her rhetoric.
Then, someone leaked the fact that the personal family body guard for the O'Donnell household had applied in California for a concealed carry permit.
Rosie's rhetoric wasn't saying no one should have guns. Rosie's rhetoric was to say, you, me, the 99% not in her income bracket, should not be allowed to have guns.
What do you do when an armed gunman breaks into your church as you worship on Sunday and you are unarmed? Anything they want you to.
Including die!
What reasonable person, especially that which says they're against guns because they're about saving lives, argues law abiding people should be disarmed in a world where the criminal minded are armed to the teeth.
You think anti-gun 'nuts' lose the right to call the police? That's an odd take. Speaking for myself, I'm an advocate for gun control (not banning outright) and don't consider myself a nut.
OK
My best wishes to your school age children.
Are we supposed to believe the little man is having his gun rights screwed over by the big bad left, or something? Do you really need to demonise those you disagree with?
I'm not a Democrat in the Legislature.
Meh, perhaps it's just the way of things now.
Complacency kills.
What's your opinion on the Dickey Amendment?
I'm usually against gun control laws.
For those who would like to brush up on its language:
Gun violence research: History of the federal funding freeze
Why were guns invented? Why is the rock no longer a common weapon of war?
Good question. Why was the gun invented. I doubt strict gun control proponents know.
Nor do they consider, if guns hadn't been invented , and the point of the Biblical first murder reference, is that people who want to kill people will find a way.
Or we could license their usage and regulate it actively, recognizing that the primary use of cars is not as a weapon. And still suffer from tragedies.
Guess what? Per cars. We do that now. And we still suffer from tragedies. And we read about terrorists who use them as weapon.
I'm not trying to convince you of anything, in truth. The hyperbole hurts my ears a little though.
Then you should stop being a proponent of gun control.
Because the crying of parents burying their children because a lunatic punk armed to the teeth shot them down like dogs. An in once recent report, while an armed police officer stayed outside the school and ignored the screams of victims being murdered inside.
Quite frankly, I don't care if anti-gun nuts ears hurt due to pro-2nd amendment citizens fighting for their rights.
You want America to tolerate being disarmed, or limited in access to firearms, when only those who obey the law are effected by those laws,making them sitting duck for armed criminals, tolerate the resistance!