Abrahamic jesus is the sun, change my mind.......

Jollybear said:

Whats the difference? The texts clearly state the Lord God and the sun are not the same and that the Lord God forbids sun worship.



So, you dont see the bible stating Jesus was a real man who held the morning star as a title? You think Jesus was literally a morning star?

Do i understand correctly?

Click to expand...

No not exactly Jesus in the Bible was initially misinterpreted as based on the sun god and still is. The true Jesus is actually Lucifer but it's being depicted the sun God. This is why it warns not to worship the sun god.


Deuteronomy 4:19
"And beware not to lift up your eyes to heaven and see the sun and the moon and the stars, all the host of heaven, and be drawn away and worship them and serve them, those which the LORD your God has allotted to all the peoples under the whole heaven."

The real Jesus is not the Jesus or discussed in the Bible but Lucifer(the real morning star as revealed in Revelations

Both are displayed as Jesus but Lucifer is the real Jesus but the teachings people follow in the Bible are not that of Lucifer but that of the sun god.

Jesus is real just depicted incorrectly in modern times. Which the Bible warns literally will happen and they say it's at the hands of the church, I can get the passages.

Halogen said:

No not exactly Jesus in the Bible was initially misinterpreted as based on the sun god and still is.

Click to expand...

So, jesus is interpreted as being the sun, do i understand correctly?

The true Jesus is actually Lucifer but it's being depicted the sun God. This is why it warns not to worship the sun god.

Click to expand...

So, dont worship Jesus/lucifer/sun, do i understand?

Deuteronomy 4:19
"And beware not to lift up your eyes to heaven and see the sun and the moon and the stars, all the host of heaven, and be drawn away and worship them and serve them, those which the LORD your God has allotted to all the peoples under the whole heaven."

The real Jesus is not the Jesus or discussed in the Bible but Lucifer(the real morning star as revealed in Revelations

Click to expand...

Morning star is synonymous with Lucifer. Its the same thing. Morning star is just the english word, Lucifer is the latin word.

Both are displayed as Jesus but Lucifer is the real Jesus

Click to expand...

So, the morning star (e.g. lucifer) is the real Jesus, yes? Are you saying the real Jesus is a literal star?

but the teachings people follow in the Bible are not that of Lucifer but that of the sun god.

Click to expand...

Is lucifer (e.g. morning star) the sun? because a star IS a sun, why are you distinguishing lucifer from the sun?

Second question: how can a sun give teachings in a bible?

Jesus is real just depicted incorrectly in modern times. Which the Bible warns literally will happen and they say it's at the hands of the church, I can get the passages.

Click to expand...

Yes, please give me the passages. That would be great.

Halogen said:

Please view this post (I'm in no way affiliated with this content).

PRIMORDIAL VIBRATIONS on Instagram: “Are most religions, including modern religions, actually based around worshiping the sun? . . For more information watch the free first…”

Once you watch all 10 short slides come back and I would like to discuss this openly. Their is content beyond this video, as it is limited time to explain an idea. It would be best to have the volume medium high.

If I didn't post correctly and broke a rule (moderator) please message me and I will edit the post. It said links were allowed if they were part of the discussion and the above one very much is.

Click to expand...

Since I can hardly imagine Jesus having had a body temperature of a few million degrees, I would opt for the human theory.

Ciao

- viole

Halogen said:

Please view this post (I'm in no way affiliated with this content).

PRIMORDIAL VIBRATIONS on Instagram: “Are most religions, including modern religions, actually based around worshiping the sun? . . For more information watch the free first…”

Once you watch all 10 short slides come back and I would like to discuss this openly. Their is content beyond this video, as it is limited time to explain an idea. It would be best to have the volume medium high.

If I didn't post correctly and broke a rule (moderator) please message me and I will edit the post. It said links were allowed if they were part of the discussion and the above one very much is.

Click to expand...

I believe I watched the slides well enough.

I believe Christianity only worships God who is an omnipresent Spirit.

9-18-1 said:

Indeed Jesus is a symbol of the sun. However not only limited to the "physical" sun but a more broader "spiritual" sun that illuminates the soul.

The Twelve disciples/apostles are the twelve zodiacal houses through which the physical sun transits. Indeed the human soul transits these twelve stations just as readily as the physical sun transits them in the sky. Each station has its own unique characteristic(s) that reflect into/onto man.

To treat Jesus as an historical man that was/is the single only embodiment of 'Christ' is pure idol worship and detracts from the point that each 'being' must manifest (crucify/resurrect) within themselves this spiritual primordial 'Christ' that is separate from any notion of a distinct being that lived (and died) in the past.

Click to expand...

I believe there is no evidence to support that notion.

Nowhere Man said:

Here's an interesting view....

The Story of Jesus is an Astrological Allegory for the Sun passing through the Zodiac each year

Click to expand...

I believe that is interesting but not very convincing. I believe Jesus does not reflect astrology but astrology may reflect Jesus.

Muffled said:

I believe there is no evidence to support that notion.

Click to expand...

I question your own standard for "evidence" if you believe it is an historical fact that (there ever was a) Jesus (who) was crucified, dead for three days, and was resurrected by 'GOD'.

The evidence I find (and is actually visible to anyone that looks) is the sun (in the sky) "dies" in the horizon every Dec. 22, 23, 24 and begins another "ascent" on the 25th.

Supposing there is, ahem, absolutely *no coincidence* between these two, I can't ever get past the fact that Christians bear a testimony that is, by default, false. Even if there was a Jesus man (for which there is no actual real evidence) who underwent a death and resurrection (again no evidence), the Christian most certainly did not witness such an event, but bear testimony of it happening with the same sincerity as if they did.

That's breaking one of the Ten Commandments:

Exodus 20:16
"You shall not give false testimony against your neighbor."

Lest a Christian say "the testimony is not false,", which it necessarily is, by virtue of the fact it was never "witnessed" in the first person/place.

I don't mean to come off as abrasive but it's difficult to engage people based on "evidence" when one is so persuaded by some "evidence" as to believe something spectacular as having happened 2000 years ago despite he/she not personally witnessing such an event. That's not "evidence"-based, it is "belief"-based.

"Belief" is not a virtue - it is a vice.