They do.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Islam belief, Noah, the Great Flood and Science. Coherent or contradictory?
- Thread starter Dawnofhope
- Start date
They do.
I don't know what unity of religion means for you, but for Baha'is it means they originate from the same spiritual source. Religions can be like trees. They grow, bear fruit, whither and eventually die. It doesn't mean they will all merge into one.
oldbadger
Skanky Old Mongrel!
I wonder if there are any reps for scientology ion RF.
Actually there have been several, only not with water. Read up about the mass extinction events.
Not now, but we don't know about the distant past with possible intelligent intervention.
Prove it.
OK...
Hmmm..... true....
I wasn't there....
But Bahai believes in spirituality but somehow denies the existence of spirits. It's just weird imo.
What!!!! ???? Coming from a Bahai that's well out-of-order!
Bahai think's that it's IT for the religious path to God and a perfect World Order. Wow!
If Bahai was bigger, it would probably be seen as badder. You're just under the radar at this time.
The evidence is overwhelming, Genesis and the rest of the Pentateuch is compiled, edited and redacted well after 1000 BCE, and not written by Moses. Evidence is clear most of the Bible is not first hand accounts.
The word TESTIMONY means a kind of EVIDENCE. By all means seek verification, but a seeker might do better to search for any CORROBORATION to support statements made by the deceased.
In the case of the flood story I think that we all know that evidence for great floods exists in the Mid-East area where Noah lived. I don't see any problem with reports of the flood covering everywhere.
And so..... the 'flood covered the world' is as true as a French person describing a vehicle gridlock as affecting 'Tout le Monde'! Or would you call him a liar and demand geological/photographic evidence for the car-jam?
First, testimony is only evidence if it is first hand evidence, and corroborated by objective verifiable evidence and the accounts in Genesis fail on all counts. Simply accounts of local and regional floods offer no support for a Noah's world flood.
Actually the subject is Islam and the Quran, but nonetheless, , ,
There is none involving the world flood. The evidence is for local and regional catastrophic floods not remotely associated with a Noah flood. Archaeological and geologic evidence is for a regional flood in the Tigris Euphrates valleys about 2900 BCE and recorded in the Sumarian cuneiform tablets that were later the basis for the Genesis account.
The flood in China is well documented Chinese account of a catastrophic river flood confirmed by geologic evidence. The catastrophic floods of Japan and the Northwest Native American are local accounts are documented Tsunami floods and confirmed by geologic evidence.
*** STAFF REMINDER ***
The staff team have noticed a few issues in this thread, and wanted to remind folks of the forum mission (and Rule 9):
The mission of Religious Forums is to provide a civil, informative, respectful, and welcoming environment where people of diverse beliefs can discuss, compare, and debate. Content members create while debating and discussing must be done in the spirit of productivity. Bashing other forums, creating unproductive content or responses to others, attempting to use this site as a platform for campaigning for or against or furthering a personal agenda, and attempting to undermine the forum mission may result in moderation.
To this end, please remember not to make personal attacks (Rule 1) and not to post content just to get a rise out of someone or misrepresent others (Rule 3). This also isn't the place to preach against a tradition (Rule 8). Productive and constructive critiques are fine and welcomed! Just remember to keep it on this side of the rules.
RF Rules
spirit_of_dawn
Active Member
From what I have researched, it seems that since Baha'u'llah couldn't perform miracles, he decided to deny all other miracles.
As for reincarnation, if anyone is interested, Baha'u'llah claims in the suppressed scripture that he was Abraham, Jesus, Muhammad and a number of other people. And he simply appeared as one of them in every age. You can read the translations here:
Will the UHJ re-institute Guardianship allowing Women to serve as Guardians? Or amend the restriction on women serving in the UHJ? : bahai
This is completely unrelated to the OP topic. Start a new thread if you want to discuss it.
CG Didymus
Veteran Member
As long as you figured out what I meant, then I'm good with that. The point is... that Baha'is make the Creation symbolic, the Flood symbolic, the resurrection of Jesus symbolic. But, did the people writing about these things think they were symbolic or actual things that really happened?
Since early Christians and a lot of Christians today still believe these things to be literally true, then I think that is exactly what the writer intended them to be. If those things didn't happen, then the writer was wrong. But, I really don't think that the writer wrote the story as if he was writing actual history, and that he only meant the story to be taken symbolically.
CG Didymus
Veteran Member
You literally want me to answer that? You know what though, I never looked up those words. I've just been throwing out the words that Baha'is have used... probably correctly, not like me, but still... What Baha'is are trying to say is you can't take the Bible literally 'cause it is symbolic, a metaphor, allegorical, figurative, or something, but definitely it didn't happen.Ah ha! I can think of other incarnations that I would prefer. Could I have a better physique next time, please? My Abs and Pecs are rubbish.
How so many great brains of the world could argue over what some folks wrote about a great flood is surprising.
Imagine asking a French person about the massive gridlock that hindered their motorway journey last week, and when they start shouting about it covering 'Tout le Monde!' I could call the geezer a bleedin' liar 'cos on that same day I took my Missus to work in Herne Bay without any trouble.
Symbol.... Metaphor..... Allegory......
Like the Flood, they say it scientifically couldn't have happened therefore, God must have some kind of symbolic meaning in the story. They make the water represent something. The Ark is something. And by the time we're done, they have a perfect explanation why the Bible is wrong, if taken literally.
I don't know why it just can't be called "myth" and say that people told these stories as if they were true to get their people to follow some rules and beliefs of their society. I don't see them telling the people, "We believe in a metaphorical supreme being, that sent an allegorical flood to kill all the symbolical people that were doing literally a lot of bad things.
Same thing with Jesus rising from the dead. I could just imagine preachers saying to believe in a symbolically risen Savior that can save you from an allegorical hell. No, they preach and seem to believe it is the real honest to God truth. Obviously the are wrong. They are using the Bible for evidence.
CG Didymus
Veteran Member
Next you're going to tell me all those supposed skeletons of giants are real and one of them had a rock stuck in his forehead.OK.......... I'm cool with your opinion.... no probs.
You mentioned, or that member mentioned David's fight with Goliath. ....:-
David is [Word] of the weak and downtrodden. Goliath is [Word] of the powerful, evil tyrants. Hmmm? The small stone is the Word of truth... that in the hands of the weak and downtrodden can defeat the mighty. Yes, yes, it does work!
For what it's worth I take the above fight as a real event. A small young person selected the right stone and slung it in to a giant's head, knocking him unconscious for long enough to kill the giant. No need for any further complication.
But I have used a sling all my days from 13yrs up until now, and twenty years ago I could put a stone through a door panel at 30 yards without trouble. I watch the news about Gaza and see film of young people with extra long (distance) slings slinging rocks hundreds of yards in to groups of Israeli soldiers and I know what these can do.
I think that David was of the tribe of Benjamin...... the shepherds....... maybe someone can confirm or correct..... those guys were the deadliest with the sling, I believe.
Oh yes..... David stoned that giant alright...... no probs. No Metaphor, Symbol or Allegory required.
CG Didymus
Veteran Member
What do I need Doc? A pill? Some rest and relaxation? Nah, when it comes to Vinayaka, I can't help my self, I gotta try and make a joke or say something allegorically funny.I think you are have PTSD from debating with the Baha’is for too long.
For a few here I might prescribe a chill pill, maybe even step it up.....
You seen pretty cool to me.
CG Didymus
Veteran Member
Even though most people would agree that doing bad things in the name of religion is terrible and those doing are... nut jobs, how do Baha'is handle it?
'Cause I know there is some Baha'i teaching that says something like that if a person has a whole bunch of bad qualities and only one good one, to look at that one good one. How do you do that with religious radicals? Or, even with those that don't hurt others physically but have radically fundamental beliefs that promote that their religion is the only one that is right?
CG Didymus
Veteran Member
Ahh gosh, you Baha'is are alright too... sometimes. Even Tony, where is that guy? Did he go walkabout or something?For a few here I might prescribe a chill pill, maybe even step it up.....
You seen pretty cool to me.
There is an important view of miracles and facts concerning history or science of scripture whether the Bible Quran, Baha'i writings or other ancient literature that the Baha'i writings do not consider the essential Revelation from God. The Baha'is do not consider the reports of miracles as a witness of the truth of Revelation nor critical to base ones belief. Even the miracle of the execution of the Bab witnessed and recorded by western sources, you referenced,is not considered evidence of proof of the Baha'i Revelation.
From: Baha’u’llah, Miracles and the Proof of Religion
"Although many people, both Baha’is and others, reported that they had seen Baha’u’llah perform miracles, just as the prophets of old did, he did not wish for them to be signs of his revelation or proofs of his validity. The Baha’i Faith does not emphasize physical miracles because they are not considered sufficient proof of anything, except for those who actually witnessed them in person.
Moreover, the emphasis on miracles in past religions led to many superstitious and harmful practices, such as not seeking medical attention or believing in unsupportable, unscientific and irrational fears and legends:
… in the sight of the Manifestations these marvels and miracles are of no importance, so much so that they do not even wish them to be mentioned. For even if these miracles were considered the greatest of proofs, they would constitute a clear evidence only for those who were present when they took place, and not for those who were absent. – Abdu’l-Baha, Some Answered Questions, newly revised edition, p. 113"
The Baha'is consider the spiritual teaching, God;s Laws are the witness of the Revelation. The description of Creation, Noah's flood,and Exodus may be consider true by the writers from the human perspective, but not necessarily factual true nor in and of themselves historical facts inspired by God.
Scripture of the religions contain writings from the human perspective and not necessarily factual concerning history and science.
In the principle of the Harmony of science and religion, the scripture concerning the physical nature of our existence must be understood and interpreted in the light of the evolving nature of scientific knowledge. If not it is possible that it becomes superstition and myth.
From: Healing and Health, from the Scientific to the Spiritual
"If religion were contrary to logical reason then it would cease to be a religion and be merely a tradition. Religion and science are the two wings upon which man’s intelligence can soar into the heights, with which the human soul can progress. It is not possible to fly with one wing alone! Should a man try to fly with the wing of religion alone he would quickly fall into the quagmire of superstition, whilst on the other hand, with the wing of science alone he would also make no progress, but fall into the despairing slough of materialism. – Abdu’l-Baha, Paris Talks, p. 144."
Your research is flawed, I agree that it is off topic and inaccurate as far as the Baha'i writings and miracles.
Last edited:
We're all human CG. Baha'is hurt and bleed like everyone else. We cope as everyone else does. I'd like to think that living the Baha'i life contributes to being a better person and more able to cope.
We had quite a number of Iranian Baha'i refugees come out our city through the 1980 not long after the Iranian revolution when several hundred Baha'is were killed. One refugee committed suicide. He had been tortured and had his genitals badly mutilated. He was a professional person but his qualifications were non-transferrable to New Zealand. So with no hope of work or a family in a completely foreign country he lost hope.
The Baha'i writings repeatedly remind us there is one life, and one life only that we are ultimately responsible and this is our own. We endeavour to treat all those we come across with love and kindness. Some people we need to leave to themselves or avoid.
W3bcrowf3r
Active Member
I don't believe in the ahadith. They contradict the Quran, the Gospel, the Psalms and the Tora.
Both Sunni and Shia ahadith are just a fabrication made by the Arab and Persian governments in that time to control people.
oldbadger
Skanky Old Mongrel!
True.......
It can be seen on this thread that Bahai doesn't believe the basic foundations of the other Abrahamic religions, at one moment jumping in to Laboratory Whites, the next trying to be 'spiritual', the next claiming no interest in politics......... blah blah..........
And yet it wants to be related to them all!
I don't mind a religion that (say) tells of how a great cosmic eagle did a dump in the heavens that became our solar system, or whatever....... I certainly wouldn't demand proof by the scientific method, nor would I climb in to a pulpit to rubbish any such belief as satanic.
But what I do get irritated by is wild claims that Bahai makes about the last 150 years. Bahai needs to get honest about these, imo.
At the Tel Aviv airport heading home after 9 day pigrimage. WIFI is good here.
Regards Tony