Segev Moran
Well-Known Member
Nice try... but your dismissal didn't do the trick just yet
[/QUOTE]
I have some problem with you saying new age.
What i described is described in much more details and much more accurate when describing our reallity was from a book that was FOUND 1400 years ago.
If you refer to the past 2000 years as new age, we are in an agreement.
These things (At least in the Jewish documents) are not from youtube rather books and articles that were written by people who lived in a much "low tech" era.
YouTube was a stepping stone in the visual communication for humans, oddly enough also described (not the literal site, rather the ability to see someone all over the world without going anywhere) thousands of years ago.
Charlatans will always exist. that is part of the problem and what makes religion a dangerous tool for people who abuse it.
In order to be able to "clean" the BS, you need to study, understand and see if things comply with your reality.
That is the only way i accept things, i assume you do the same.
I do believe that there is some effect to stars on our reality, it will be absurd to think that a 5 sentences paragraph represent ANY portion of truth to 8% of the world.
These beliefs are a mix of religion and new agedOf course, one can dismiss that. It is very simple, actually. Look.
Looking
[/QUOTE]
I have some problem with you saying new age.
What i described is described in much more details and much more accurate when describing our reallity was from a book that was FOUND 1400 years ago.
If you refer to the past 2000 years as new age, we are in an agreement.
Unfortunately there are many charlatans.built up by no greater education than watching chralatans on youtube
These things (At least in the Jewish documents) are not from youtube rather books and articles that were written by people who lived in a much "low tech" era.
YouTube was a stepping stone in the visual communication for humans, oddly enough also described (not the literal site, rather the ability to see someone all over the world without going anywhere) thousands of years ago.
Charlatans will always exist. that is part of the problem and what makes religion a dangerous tool for people who abuse it.
In order to be able to "clean" the BS, you need to study, understand and see if things comply with your reality.
That is the only way i accept things, i assume you do the same.
Can't see the resemblance here.and based on the same evidence that leads people to believe in horoscopes,
I do believe that there is some effect to stars on our reality, it will be absurd to think that a 5 sentences paragraph represent ANY portion of truth to 8% of the world.
homeopathy is not even close to the reality test.
You should however not be absurd and really think that medicines cure anything.
Antibiotics for example was thought to be a "miracle worker". it was taught to cure people. it took too many years to understand how bad antibiotics are for curing illness and for the human body in general.
If you'll study recent medical articles, you'll surprisingly discover that the modern "cures" are not really that effective and at times cause more harm then help.
The eastern doctrines cannot be argues. most medical authorities today support alternative method and if you'll watch closely you'll see the trend changes in favor of natural healing and not poison as a cure.
when i take a pill, i think 10 times if i really need it! I advice you to do the same.
Advil doesn't cure whats wrong with your body, it simply suppresses the symptoms! how convenient, yet far from effective!
I am not even going to respond to that this goes in the same category as walking under a ladderand that black cats bring bad luck.
I agree. many (too many) do. a few don't. they actually much more scientifically educated than me, or you or probably most of the people on earth.They are usually motivated by a bunch of meaningless deepities or just straight ignorance about what modern science really entails.
I advise you to verify whose word your listening to when studying such things.
Unlike science? what do you think science tries to achieve?Not to speak of the everlasting hope to extend biological life beyond the obvious irreversible death of our brains.
Obviously you never red the correct booksIn that respect, they can be considered not logical conclusions based on no evidence whatsoever.
The illogical thought i used to have was similar to your i assume. how foolish i was
I don't hope your not eitherIf we do not count wishful thinking as evidence.
You were quite bad actually.. you didn't dismiss anything i talked about. you simply dismissed A because B doesn't sound rightHow am I doing in dismissing that? Seems really possible after all
Ciao back at yaCiao
Segev- viole