• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Vive La France!

Saint Frankenstein

Saint Frankenstein

Wanderer From Afar
Premium Member
ChristineM said:
Oh how ignorant these ex fascist can be.

And i told you i didnt misrepresent, the judgement is plain to anyone reading it without bias. French law has no objection to anyone calling le pen a fascist. If you understood french law, which obviously you dont, you would realise what that meant

Unlike america, in france and most of europe freedom of speech comes with responsibility. Think on the consequences of that little snippet of information, it shouldn't be to hard to figure out.

So put be on ignore because there is no way you are going to bully me, those tactics dont work.
Click to expand...
Bullying? Okay, now you're making things up. No one is bullying you. You're going on ignore for totally wasting my time. You don't even bother to actually respond to what I said. Your article does not say what you think it says. It just says that people can call her what they want, legally. It's like a libel case. Her case was thrown out because they found that guy's speech acceptable as she is a public figure, a politician. If he had called her a communist, it would've been the same thing. But that's hardly the same as the court agreeing that she is that thing the guy called her. I'm really not sure what's so difficult to understand there. o_O
 
ChristineM

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
Saint Frankenstein said:
Bullying? Okay, now you're making things up. No one is bullying you. You're going on ignore for totally wasting my time. You don't even bother to actually respond to what I said. Your article does not say what you think it says. It just says that people can call her what they want, legally. It's like a libel case. Her case was thrown out because they found that guy's speech acceptable as she is a public figure, a politician. If he had called her a communist, it would've been the same thing. But that's hardly the same as the court agreeing that she is that thing the guy called her. I'm really not sure what's so difficult to understand there. o_O
Click to expand...

So what is
Saint Frankenstein said:
Keep it up and you'll end up on ignore because you're starting to **** me off. I already went over this ****. Stop acting like I haven't
Click to expand...
 
Nyingjé Tso

Nyingjé Tso

Tänpa Yungdrung zhab pä tän gyur jig
Y'all need to seriously chill and read actual local news instead of the clearly hyperbolics sensationalists toilet papers.

Thanks @ChristineM ... A lot.

I'll only answer to the most totally incorrect thing in this thread:
99% of anti semitics acts here are perpetrated by far right dumbasses who think Le Pen is an exemple.
Same dumbasses who went in the streets giving ham sandwiches to starving homeless muslims. (Or "how to be a trash human being 101")

Hope you see a pattern because I won't spell it out.

With that said, I'll be on my way out.
 
Shad

Shad

Veteran Member
Stanyon said:
As far as the Eiffel tower with a bullet proof barrier around it, would you have ever imagined that it would be deemed necessary? If not, what changed to make it so?
Hint: it's not because of the so dubbed far-right and facists
Click to expand...

To be frank Gröning would have stole it if he could figure out how to. He loved pillaging
 
Shad

Shad

Veteran Member
ChristineM said:
Terrorist crimes are committed by terrorists, it doesnt matter what religion they are. Would you blame muslims for the 1996 Manchester bombing. Oh righ that was christians wasnt it?
Click to expand...

Different ideologies. I know research is hard....
 
ChristineM

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
Shad said:
Catholicism has little to do with the IRA as a goal. Remember where the IRA is and the history of English and Ireland.
Click to expand...

Dont tell me what and where the ira is? Their motives were to drive protestants out of NI (many of whom were just as historically irish as the catholics and in the majority.)
The ira were (mostly still are) Catholic sponsored by american catholics to murder protestants.
 
Shad

Shad

Veteran Member
ChristineM said:
Dont tell me what and where the ira is? Their motives were to drive protestants out of NI (many of whom were just as historically irish as the catholics and in the majority.)
Click to expand...

No it was to drive out the British post and prior to the war of independence divided Ireland into the Republic and Northern Ireland.


The ira were (mostly still are) Catholic sponsored by american catholics to murder protestants.
Click to expand...

No it's goals was for Northern Ireland to be part of the Republic of Ireland
 
metis

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
ChristineM said:
Dont tell me what and where the ira is? Their motives were to drive protestants out of NI (many of whom were just as historically irish as the catholics and in the majority.)
The ira were (mostly still are) Catholic sponsored by american catholics to murder protestants.
Click to expand...
That is no longer the case, fortunately, and you also screwed up the IRA's main motive, which was to seek equality for Catholics under N.I.'s discriminatory practices. However, I certainly didn't and don't endorse their methodology.
 
ChristineM

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
Shad said:
No it was to drive out the British post and prior to the war of independence divided Ireland into the Republic and Northern Ireland.

No it's goals was for Northern Ireland to be part of the Republic of Ireland
Click to expand...

Revisionist history or romance?

The troubles between catholic and protestant stared centuries before NI. In the early 1600s when Scotts and English were give land in ireland.

The first ira formed in 1909 (incidentally before northern ireland was formed) to fight the war and disbanded 1922

Various versions of the ira formed in 1969 (named official ira), another 1974 (irish national liberation army), another 1997 (real ira), (and several more small terrorist groups aligning themselves broadly with the larger groups)
What had their goals to do with a war that ended 50 yeas + earlier?

The ira were catholic (and mostly still are), they killed (still do) protestants, blindly bomb killing innocents and children, destroy property, run drugs and prostitution rackets.

Their goals were not democratic but terrorist and criminal
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top