• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Trinity and Salvation

2ndpillar

Well-Known Member
OK, we'll disregard Paul. So find somewhere in the OT or Gospels where belief in the trinity is required for salvation. That was my original question.

The Trinity dogma comes from the Council of Nicaea, convened by the "beast with two horns like a lamb" (Revelation 13:11), Constantine, who also instituted the Roman Church. The Trinity, and its cross image is the mark of that beast, who was Constantine, whose god/"dragon" was Sol Invictus, the god of the sun.. According to Revelation 14:10, any one with the mark of the beast will drink from the cup of God's wrath. That is not the kind of "salvation" one generally looks forward to. The Nicene Trinity Church is the church officially deemed as the church of Rome by the Roman Emperor Theodosius in 380 AD. When one worships the beast, they worship the "dragon" (Revelation 13:4). When one worships the beast, they remain in the grave for another 1000 years (Revelation 20:4).
 

2ndpillar

Well-Known Member
How many sins we get before it's too late? I'd hate to go over the limit. I'm sure you would too. Do you ever wonder if you yourself have gone over the limit? Seems like someone would go nuts worrying about that all the time.

I might point out that all of the things Jesus said to the Apostles was before his death and resurrection. Wouldn't you think things changed a bit after that? If so what was it that changed? Or did nothing change? Are we still under the law? I might remind you the scriptures say the law made no man perfect (Rom 3:20), whereas belief in Jesus did (Heb 10:14).

One last thing, check out the first 3 verses in Galatians chapter 3. How do you take those?

You keep building your house on the words of Paul. That house will "fall" (Matthew 7:24-27). Paul as the false prophet, will apparently find himself in the lake of fire (Revelation 20:10). As for after Yeshua left, John stated that the sinners, those who practices sin, are sons of the devil, and those born of God, "cannot sin" (1 John 3:8-9).
 

2ndpillar

Well-Known Member
Paul seemed to love speaking in tongues too,

1Cor 14:18: "I thank my God, I speak with tongues more than ye all:"

I'll cast my lot in with you and Paul. The other night I spoke in tongues while dreaming. I woke up with tears in my eyes. Praise God for the ability to pray perfectly!

Now can you interpret what you spoke, or you just sowing confusion? One of my friends was Assembly of God, and she apparently spoke in tongues, but was caused to stumble (Matthew 18:6) by her church and its teachings, and wound up in hell (New Jersey).
 

rrobs

Well-Known Member
You keep building your house on the words of Paul. That house will "fall" (Matthew 7:24-27). Paul as the false prophet, will apparently find himself in the lake of fire (Revelation 20:10). As for after Yeshua left, John stated that the sinners, those who practices sin, are sons of the devil, and those born of God, "cannot sin" (1 John 3:8-9).
Mind if I ask by what authority you say that about Paul?
 

rrobs

Well-Known Member
Now can you interpret what you spoke, or you just sowing confusion? One of my friends was Assembly of God, and she apparently spoke in tongues, but was caused to stumble (Matthew 18:6) by her church and its teachings, and wound up in hell (New Jersey).
Not much to really "interpret" there. It just says Paul was glad he spoke in tongues a lot. Believing that is totally optional.
 

rrobs

Well-Known Member
You keep building your house on the words of Paul. That house will "fall" (Matthew 7:24-27). Paul as the false prophet, will apparently find himself in the lake of fire (Revelation 20:10). As for after Yeshua left, John stated that the sinners, those who practices sin, are sons of the devil, and those born of God, "cannot sin" (1 John 3:8-9).
Geez, I don't like the Gospels. Let's axe them while we're at it.

Just kidding. I like the Gospels and Paul. I'll keep 'em both. That's just me though, feel free to get rid of any scripture you want.
 

rrobs

Well-Known Member
Try to read the New Testament in the original Greek. And ask God to protect you, increase your knowledge and grant you Hes understanding.

The Trinity is just a fabrication, which they are injecting so hard in the translations these days. I can see how they changed verses and made Jesus Christ appear as a god or God, but that wasn't the case in the Greek original.

Example: In English translations, they say that in Hebrews, God is calling Jesus God when He is talking about Hes Throne. In fact the Greek says that God said to Jesus that God is Hes Throne, from ages to ages.
Another: The famous John 1. In the Greek original it's talking about how Gods Word is Divine, and that God created everything. But English translations change the word 'logos' into 'Jesus'..
Etc.

But most people do not fcking care. They don't care! And it makes me sad, and angry. They don't care. All they care about is what their environment says, and what the majority says and how they are viewed in the eyes of others. They don't care about what God and Jesus Christ really say! They depend so much on the lies of the Anti Christ that they will defend hes lies blindly!
Just hold forth the truth brother. God gives the increase and He says His word never returns void but accomplishes that which He intended.

Isa 55:11,

So shall my word be that goeth forth out of my mouth: it shall not return unto me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please, and it shall prosper [in the thing] whereto I sent it.​

I understand your sadness and anger, but just trust God to accomplish His will. All you can do is speak. You never know whose heart you may touch, even if it takes years to do so. I remember when hardly anybody at all knew the trinity was not scriptural. It is slowly changing, praise God!
 

rrobs

Well-Known Member
I think Schizophrenic is the correct term.
Yeah, schizophrenic is closer to what it is than weird. I was just trying not to be overly harsh. I suppose there is really no reason to do that though. Truth is truth. We should tell it like it is! Thanks.
 

rrobs

Well-Known Member
I thank you so much for the above, but I'm sorry to say that I do have to take issue with the part I underlined because I do believe that the gospel requires action on our part as well.

There's a non-biblical story that goes like this: Jesus and the Twelve were walking along a muddy path right after a rain, and they ran across a man with his donkey stuck in the mud, and he was yanking on it and cussing up a storm to try and get it out. Jesus asked the man, "Can I help you", and the man said "Yes, thank you and they yanked the donkey out together.

A bit further down the path Jesus and the Twelve came upon a man who also had his donkey stuck in the mud, and the man was on the side of the road praying "Jesus, please remove my donkey from the mud", but Jesus just shook his head and kept on walking.

The apostles were confused, and asked Jesus why did he help the first man but not the second? Jesus replied "Because the second man wanted me to do all the work whereas the first man was willing to help me out".

The gospel is more than just a set of beliefs-- it's a call to action, imo. One cannot just be a Christian and then ignore what is taught and what we are expected to do. IOW, it's gotta be a lifestyle and not just a set of beliefs, imo.

I pray that you agree?
Well, our salvation is one thing and our walk is another thing. I think the Epistles make it clear that salvation is by grace and not by works.

Eph 2:8-10,

8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: [it is] the gift of God:
9 Not of works, lest any man should boast.
10 For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them.
The latter part of verse 10 mentions that we were saved so we could do the good works. The ability to do the works is a result of our salvation, which clearly came by grace, not by works.

Whether or not we do the good works does not affect our salvation though. Jesus was a complete savior. He saved us because we couldn't do it ourselves. Before he saved us we were dead in trespasses and sins.

Eph 2:1-5,

1 And you [hath he quickened], who were dead in trespasses and sins;
2 Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience:
3 Among whom also we all had our conversation in times past in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind; and were by nature the children of wrath, even as others.
4 But God, who is rich in mercy, for his great love wherewith he loved us,
5 Even when we were dead in sins, hath quickened us together with Christ, (by grace ye are saved).​

Dead people aren't in much of a position to do any good works at all. That's why we first needed the salvation which came by the works of Jesus, not our own. Salvation is by grace. None of us deserved it. We were all scoundrels before being born again!

In short, don't confuse salvation with the works God has given us to do after being saved. Two different animals altogether.
 

blü 2

Veteran Member
Premium Member
if someone does not believe in the trinity they are not saved.

So let's see some scriptures that make belief in the trinity a requirement for salvation.
The Trinity doctrine developed in the 3rd century and had its present form late in the 4th. The aim was to raise Jesus to the status of 'God' without being open to the charge of pagan polytheism.

The doctrine states: ‘The One God exists as three persons and one substance’ (Oxford Dict. of the Christian Church) also phrased, ‘In the unity of the Godhead there are Three Persons, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, these Three Persons being truly distinct one from another’ (Catholic Encyclopedia).

This means that none of the three persons is less than God, therefore each of the three persons is 100% of God. Which further means that the doctrine of the Trinity is incoherent ─ 100% + 100% + 100% = 300%, which necessarily means three gods.

This incoherence is acknowledged, not debated. OxDCC calls it ‘a mystery in the strict sense’ ie the doctrine ‘can neither be known by unaided human reason apart from revelation, nor cogently demonstrated by reason after it has been revealed’. The Cath. Encl. calls it an ‘absolute mystery’: ‘An absolute mystery is a truth whose existence or possibility could not be discovered by a creature, and whose essence (inner substantial being) can be expressed by the finite mind only in terms of analogy, e.g. the Trinity’ (which comes to the same thing as the first but not so bravely put).

The Tanakh never mentions God as a Trinity.

The NT never mentions God as a Trinity.

Jesus never once claims to be God.

Jesus repeatedly >states that he is not God<, simply God's agent or envoy.

Not even Paul thinks Jesus is God. Paul thinks Yahweh is God and Jesus is Lord.

So it would seem rather odd for a follower of Jesus to ignore Jesus' own repeated message and think that Jesus required belief in the Trinity as an essential for salvation.

Perhaps the problem is that most Christians tend not to read their bibles critically, with the aim of understanding what is actually written, but rather know what they know of it through the pulpit ( a source not much famed for its objectivity).
 

darvas

New Member
We All know this universe contains of billion of galaxy, and very big possible in each galaxy at least there is one inhabited planet like earth.. meaning there are billions of inhabited earth.. how manytimes jesus should re born, incarnate and each planet, how many billion he should dead on the cross in each planet for salbation?? Funny
 

2ndpillar

Well-Known Member
Geez, I don't like the Gospels. Let's axe them while we're at it.

Just kidding. I like the Gospels and Paul. I'll keep 'em both. That's just me though, feel free to get rid of any scripture you want.

By the way, where did the canon for the present books in the NT that you use come from? It came from the bishop of Alexandria, Athanasius, a guy who was present at the Council of Nicaea, who was a head cheerleader for the false Trinity dogma. The abominations keep coming (Revelation 17:5). And when did he release that canon? Oh, yeah, he released them on the pagan festival of Easter in 367 A.D..
 

2ndpillar

Well-Known Member
Mind if I ask by what authority you say that about Paul?

Certainly not be the authority of the beast, his false prophet, and the devil, who are now at this moment, in the form of their "demon spirits", gathering all the "kings of the whole world" to Har-Magedon. (Revelation 16:13-16).

Revelation 16: 13And I saw coming out of the mouth of the dragon and out of the mouth of the beast and out of the mouth of the false prophet, three unclean spirits like frogs; 14for they are spirits of demons, performing signs, which go out to the kings of the whole world, to gather them together for the war of the great day of God, the Almighty. 15(“Behold, I am coming like a thief. Blessed is the one who stays awake and keeps his clothes, so that he will not walk about naked and men will not see his shame.”) 16And they gathered them together to the place which in Hebrew is called Har-Magedon.
 

shmogie

Well-Known Member
Leaving aside for a moment the argument of whether of not there is a trinity, I would like to address a central aspect of the question. One of the most damaging aspects about the trinity debate, one to which many sincere Trinitarian Christians adhere, is that if someone does not believe in the trinity they are not saved.

Salvation is the most important thing in life. Indeed, it determines one's eternal state. Why would God not make a requirement to believe in the trinity as plain as the nose on one's face? Why would God make it necessary to "read between the lines" in order be eternally saved? I can't imagine an earthly father doing something like that, let alone our heavenly father. If it were that important why would God not have used the word "trinity" at least once somewhere in the scriptures? Why do we not find even once the phrase, "Jesus is God" somewhere in the scriptures? Why would He make it so darn cryptic?

To those who insist belief in the trinity is a requirement for salvation, I challenge anyone to find an actual scripture that explicitly says one must believe in the trinity to be saved. In fact I will allow the introduction of any extraneous document written before the 5th century to prove the requirement of belief in the trinity to be saved, even though I personally take 100% of my doctrine from the scriptures and nothing but the scriptures. Now I understand that there are extraneous church documents that expound on the trinity, but I've not seen any that actually make belief in the trinity a requirement for salvation. At least the early trinitarians were tolerant of those who did not believe in the trinity, not condemning them to hell, as is the common teaching in the orthodox churches these days.
Denominations major in minors. I am a Trinitarian but I know many fine Christians who are not. Since I have no remit to judge anyone, I leave that to God. I really wonder if what we think is important is important to God. I agree, I too find no scripture tying salvation to belief in the trinity. There are Arians who believe Trinitarians are on Gods bad list, just say´n. Peace
 

shmogie

Well-Known Member
By the way, where did the canon for the present books in the NT that you use come from? It came from the bishop of Alexandria, Athanasius, a guy who was present at the Council of Nicaea, who was a head cheerleader for the false Trinity dogma. The abominations keep coming (Revelation 17:5). And when did he release that canon? Oh, yeah, he released them on the pagan festival of Easter in 367 A.D..
There is no doubt that at least 80% of the canon was in use in the second century.
 

shmogie

Well-Known Member
Well, if the false prophet Paul says it, it must be true. On the other hand, Yeshua said "false prophets will arise" but to be "saved", one must "endure to the end" (Matthew 24:11-13). The best description of the false prophets is found in (Matthew 7:15-23), whereas on that day, with respect to the wolves in sheep's clothing (Mt 7:15) many will say, 'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and in your name cast out demons, and in your name perform many miracles'? (Matthew 7:23). I think you have latched onto the seed of the tares, which according to Matthew 7:13, that "broad" "way" leads to "destruction".
Paul, a false prophet ? Hilarious. Matthew was a pro golfer also.
 

David T

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Good point, but as I'm sure you've noticed, it's the things that are not so plain that people make the biggest deal about.
This is also like trying to read A text through 2,000 years of development. The split grows daily between its now incomprehensible nonsense in one end of spectrum to, it must believed mindlessly on the other end. The text is not the problem its us. That is not remotely addressed in christian theology because its the problem.
 

David T

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Paul, a false prophet ? Hilarious. Matthew was a pro golfer also.
He was? I although now that i think of it he did seem to indicate he had a handicap of sorts called an affliction. Clearly he is talking about a horrible slice.
 

Faithofchristian

Well-Known Member
Leaving aside for a moment the argument of whether of not there is a trinity, I would like to address a central aspect of the question. One of the most damaging aspects about the trinity debate, one to which many sincere Trinitarian Christians adhere, is that if someone does not believe in the trinity they are not saved.

Salvation is the most important thing in life. Indeed, it determines one's eternal state. Why would God not make a requirement to believe in the trinity as plain as the nose on one's face? Why would God make it necessary to "read between the lines" in order be eternally saved? I can't imagine an earthly father doing something like that, let alone our heavenly father. If it were that important why would God not have used the word "trinity" at least once somewhere in the scriptures? Why do we not find even once the phrase, "Jesus is God" somewhere in the scriptures? Why would He make it so darn cryptic?

To those who insist belief in the trinity is a requirement for salvation, I challenge anyone to find an actual scripture that explicitly says one must believe in the trinity to be saved. In fact I will allow the introduction of any extraneous document written before the 5th century to prove the requirement of belief in the trinity to be saved, even though I personally take 100% of my doctrine from the scriptures and nothing but the scriptures. Now I understand that there are extraneous church documents that expound on the trinity, but I've not seen any that actually make belief in the trinity a requirement for salvation. At least the early trinitarians were tolerant of those who did not believe in the trinity, not condemning them to hell, as is the common teaching in the orthodox churches these days.

So let's see some scriptures that make belief in the trinity a requirement for salvation.

To answer your question,
You said ( Why would God not make a requirement to believe in the trinity as plain as the nose on one's face?)

All because God gave each individual a brain to think with, God is not going to do all your work for you.That means studying the Bible for ones self. Don't Waite to be spoon fed.
There are lot people as well as Christians that don't even have the slightest clue or idea what the bible actually does teaches or Confirm's.
There are things in the bible that are as plain as the nose on ones face.

In your speaking about the Trinity. Just how much more can Christ Jesus be about it, Than when he was speaking to the disciples, saying unto them "Go you therefore, teach all nation's, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit" Matthew 28:19.

"For in him ( Jesus) dwells all the fullness of the Godhead bodily" Colossians 2:9.

There you have the Trinity, Father,Son,Holy Spirit.
How much more can that be plain as the nose on ones face.
So the requirement for salvation is to be baptized in the Father and Son and the Holy Spirit. For salvation.

Jesus in the speaking to the disciples saying unto them "If you had known me, you should have known my Father also,
and from here forth, you know him, and have seen him" John 14:7.

Note Jesus said ( and have seen him)
All because Jesus is God the Father.
How much more plainly does Jesus have to be, that it's as plain as the nose on ones face.

Here's a question for anyone, In the book of John 14:28---"Ye have heard how I said unto you, I go away, and come again unto you. If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father: for my Father is greater than I "

How is the Father greater than Jesus,
If Jesus is God the Father, how exactly does this work?
It's as plain as the nose on ones face.
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
Did you convert back recently?

I can't remember but I think I remember (I know) you said you weren't (a practicing) christian...agnostic?

Congrads.
Several months ago after almost a three-year soul-searching after being pretty much agnostic, but not atheistic, for many years. Long story of how I came back, and thanks so much for the "Congrads".
 
Top