• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

3 John 1:11 , cannot be reconciled with John 1:18 literal general interpretation

Desert Snake

Veteran Member
3 John 1:11
This means that unless you are aware of God, there is evil

John 1:18
Often interpreted as a literal, statement, concerning god.

Obviously Jochanan isn't meaning John 1:18 as a literal statement, since he uses the same wording to mean otherwise.
 

Desert Snake

Veteran Member
We would default to the non contradictory interpretation, thusly, that John 1:18 isn't a literal general statement, about God.
 

Dawnofhope

Non-Proselytizing Baha'i
Staff member
Premium Member
3 John 1:11
This means that unless you are aware of God, there is evil

John 1:18
Often interpreted as a literal, statement, concerning god.

Obviously Jochanan isn't meaning John 1:18 as a literal statement, since he uses the same wording to mean otherwise.

Its useful to consider Matthew 25:31-46 where knowing God is associated with good deeds.
 

pearl

Well-Known Member
This means that unless you are aware of God, there is evil

It presents disagreement within the Johannine community.
Do not imitate evil
Gaius should not be influenced by the behavior of Diotrephes.

Often interpreted as a literal, statement, concerning god.

Obviously Jochanan isn't meaning John 1:18 as a literal statement, since he uses the same wording to mean otherwise.

The only Son, God: while the vast majority of later textual witnesses have another reading, "the Son, the only one" or "the only Son," earliest manuscripts, monogenēs theos, but takes the first term to mean not just "Only One" but to include a filial relationship with the Father, as at Lk9:38 ("only child") or Heb 11:17 ("only son") and as translated at Jn1:14. The Logos is thus "only Son" and God but not Father/God.
 
Top