• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Has who asserts for "existing” or "non-existing" of something actively to lift burden of proof?

Thermos aquaticus

Well-Known Member
"There are atheists who also like a good debate, just like many theists."

I welcome that, but they the Atheism people, fail to provide any evidences in support of Atheism they so fervently demand from the Believers. Don't they, please?
Regards

The burden of proof lies with the person who claims that gods exist, not with those who don't believe them.
 

Willamena

Just me
Premium Member
I believe, anybody who asserts* something whether for "existing" something or "non-existing" of something actively, has to lift the burden of proof, please.
And it is reasonable.
Right, please?

Regards
They have the burden of proof. Don't know about lifting it.
 

Willamena

Just me
Premium Member
Obviously, the burden of proof lies with the theist. They are making the assertion that God exists.
Person A: I don't believe in science.

Person B: That's absurd. What is your reasoning for dismissing all of science?

Person A: I don't have to explain myself to you, it's those people who believe in science who have to explain themselves.
 
Top