• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Its going to be a rough ride

Thermos aquaticus

Well-Known Member
One instance does not a trend, make. Neither does two in a ten year period. If you have to reach THAT FAR to claim an antithetical, it basically just ends up proving the original point.
The truth just gets lost in the 'sea of lies', now. When someone is "reporting" whatever someone else wants to believe is news, everyone thinks they know what's going on, and no one really does.
In the reality created and pushed by their "news" sources, it makes sense. Dishonesty has consequences. Especially when it becomes systemic.

Good journalism does exist out there, but you are right in that we have to wade through all of the muck to find it. Democracies only work when there is an engaged citizenry, and that is true now more than ever.
 

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
Modern liberals were very much behind the military draft & various wars.
So I wouldn't condemn only social conservatives for unreasonable
impositions on others. And it was only recently that liberals supported
gay marriage.....Dick Cheney did before Obama or the Clintons.
And again I agree. But I'm not a modern liberal. At seventy, I'm not a "modern" anything. I'm much more of a classic liberal, in the Locke, Mill and Adams sense, and hence nowadays more conservative than many conservatives. How's that for a conundrum?

But really, classical liberal thinking extols (when possible, and constrained only when necessary), personal, social, economic and political freedom. That's about where I'm coming from.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
And again I agree. But I'm not a modern liberal. At seventy, I'm not a "modern" anything. I'm much more of a classic liberal, in the Locke, Mill and Adams sense, and hence nowadays more conservative than many conservatives. How's that for a conundrum?

But really, classical liberal thinking extols (when possible, and constrained only when necessary), personal, social, economic and political freedom. That's about where I'm coming from.
I wouldn't accuse you of being a modern liberal.
And I too identify as a classical liberal, although not on RF.
The reason is that RF staff equate it with "conservative".
I think that's wrong.
I also identify as Jeffersonian liberal (but with less miscegenation & slave holding).
 

PureX

Veteran Member
Good journalism does exist out there, but you are right in that we have to wade through all of the muck to find it. Democracies only work when there is an engaged citizenry, and that is true now more than ever.
Engaged is one thing, but now days it requires an obsession to wade through all the deliberate lies and misinformation to find real and accurate news. And there are a lot of people that have never been taught how to do it. Keeping people poorly educated and distracted is a deliberate and significant factor in the rise of plutocracy.
 

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
There is also a high bar that has to be met in order to change the US Constitution which is a good thing. As US citizens we could throw out anything in the US Constitution if there were enough votes, so the majority can still be tyrannical, but I think most citizens see the value in protecting the rights of the minority because you never know when you may be in the minority.
Very well said! Thank you.
 

pearl

Well-Known Member
That aside, everyone in the world except the 51 percent of Americans who elected him knows that Trump is a moron and the current situation in the US is not likely sustainable.

Trump lost the popular vote by more than 1 million. Granted some of those who voted for him were duped into believing their life would improve, but others, knowing full well he was a 'moron' nevertheless he was their vehicle to the Supreme Court. The result of one issue voting and the result of not bothering to vote.
 
Top