• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

His Eminence, The Pope.

savagewind

Veteran Member
Premium Member
but there remained unity until the Reformation. .
I believe that the body of The Christ IS unified. Unification is what makes a body. In my opinion.

You say the above which implies that after the Reformation unity was lost. Am I reading you right?
 

Furchizedek

Member
Let me remind you of Rule 8 of the forum:

"8. Preaching/Proselytizing
Creating (or linking to) content intended to convert/recruit others to your religion, spirituality, sect/denomination, or lack thereof is not permitted. Similarly, attempting to convert others away from their religion, spiritual convictions, or sect/denomination will also be considered a form of preaching. Stating opinions as a definitive matter of fact (i.e., without "I believe/feel/think" language, and/or without references) may be moderated as preaching."

So I recommend you stop that right now or I'll start reporting you.

I am not attempting to convert anyone to anything. I don't do that. Nor am I selling anything like your church does, intimidating people by telling them that outside of your church there is no salvation. And they state it "as a definitive matter of fact." And yes, your church does say that. And yes, everything I say is what I believe, feel, and think. And your "if you don't stop saying things I don't like I'm going to call the police" attitude is very childish, imo. "You stop that right now or I'll start reporting you." That's essentially what they did to Jesus, 'You stop that right now or we're going to call in the Roman authorities to crucify you and shut you up.' He hath a devil, and is mad; why hear ye him? (John 10:20) Call the authorities.
 

Furchizedek

Member
There were disagreements among the infant churches as well, but there remained unity until the Reformation.

There was "unity" or the risk of being tortured and burned at the stake if you didn't agree.

Even now more is held in common than we realize. There are many collaborative works among the various theologians where some agreement is found, especially between Lutherans and Catholics. Though interpretive methods differ, there is unity on the role of Scripture.
There can be unity within diversity.

Do you mean like this? (Flat out, unilateral, imperious statements from a Catholic, below. Take them to a priest and see if he says any of them are wrong):

If we reject Catholic authority, then we have to reject the Bible, because it is only by Catholic authority that we know that the Bible IS IN FACT the Bible.

"The Catholic Church, [is] the sole authentic interpreter of scripture."

Yes, the scripture can be quoted and understood out of context. It happens all the time. That is why Jesus gave us the Church, the Catholic Church, the Mystical Body of Christ, the Mystical Bride of Christ, the "Pillar and Ground of Truth"

The Catholic Church has the authority to put books in scripture. Nobody else has this authority.

unless we go by what the Catholic Church says, and what it said at the Council of Hippo in 393, how do we know that scripture really is scripture? How do we know Matthew is inspired but not Didache? How do we know 2 Corinthians is inspired and not Shepherd of Hermas? Only because the teaching authority of the Catholic Church says so! The only way you know that the scripture IS REALLY SCRIPTURE is by the very Church teaching authority you reject.

Let us keep in mind that it was the Catholic faith that was once delivered to the saints. Protestantism, with its false doctrines of scripture only, faith only, and once-saved-always-saved, was not invented until the sixteenth century. Outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation.

That's why we need the Church, the Catholic Church, to interpret the scripture. Without the Church, we have spiritual anarchy.

there is no point in believing in the Bible if one does not believe in the Catholic Church since the Church's authority is the only authority we have that establishes the Bible as scripture

If the teachings of scripture seem to be at odds with the teachings of the Church, it means we misunderstand the scripture.

Interpretation of scripture is reserved for the teaching authority of the Church.
 

Furchizedek

Member
Do you condemn Christians in general praying in public as strongly as you condemn Catholics praying to Mary?

Do you feel you have to ask slanted questions in order to beat me? Are you so desperate? Where did I condemn anyone? Jesus is the one who says that when you pray, you should pray to the Father. Jesus knows (IMO) and Satan knows (IMO) that when you pray to dead human beings, your prayers are wasted and unheard by God the Father. Satan probably loves the fact that NOT ONLY are you praying in vain to dead human beings, but you're also disobeying Jesus as well. It's a double win for Satan when you pray to dead human beings. It seems that Jesus is the one who "condemns" what you apparently want to do no matter what He says. If you don't like what Jesus says, your argument is with Him, not with me. Jesus condemns you (IMO), not me:

"If a man love me, he will keep my words."(John 14:23)
"He that loveth me not keepeth not my sayings." (John 14:24)

"But thou, WHEN thou prayest, ...pray to thy Father." (Matthew 6:6)

When Catholics pray to Mary and other dead human beings, they deliberately and willfully do not keep Jesus' sayings, His words. (IMO) And Jesus says they "loveth me not." (IMO)
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
Do you feel you have to ask slanted questions in order to beat me? Are you so desperate?
Not to beat you; to see whether you're acting hypocritically.

Where did I condemn anyone? Jesus is the one who says that when you pray, you should pray to the Father.
... in secret. Don't forget that part.

Edit: and I'm talking about this post: His Eminence, The Pope.

If you don't want to call what you say there "condemning," fine - the term we use doesn't matter. The point I'm trying to get at is whether you take the same attitude toward public prayer that you take toward praying to Mary.

Jesus knows (IMO) and Satan knows (IMO) that when you pray to dead human beings, your prayers are wasted and unheard by God the Father.
So you don't think that God sees and hears all?

Satan probably loves the fact that NOT ONLY are you praying in vain to dead human beings, but you're also disobeying Jesus as well. It's a double win for Satan when you pray to dead human beings. It seems that Jesus is the one who "condemns" what you apparently want to do no matter what He says. If you don't like what Jesus says, your argument is with Him, not with me. Jesus condemns you (IMO), not me:

"If a man love me, he will keep my words."(John 14:23)
"He that loveth me not keepeth not my sayings." (John 14:24)

"But thou, WHEN thou prayest, ...pray to thy Father." (Matthew 6:6)
Let's quote the whole thing. I'll bold the part you keep leaving out:

'But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret;"

You think that the whole passage is a command from Jesus, correct?

When Catholics pray to Mary and other dead human beings, they deliberately and willfully do not keep Jesus' sayings, His words. (IMO) And Jesus says they "loveth me not." (IMO)
How about when Protestants pray in legislative assemblies or classrooms? How about when they bow their heads for the invocation at a public event? Are these people deliberately and willfully not keeping Jesus's words? Do they "loveth Jesus not?"

I mean, you're arguing that Christians ought to obey Jesus's instructions in Matthew 6:6 every single time they pray, right?
 
Last edited:

savagewind

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Without the supreme cuteness of error being made to look glorious where would we who disagree be? Bored to death, maybe.
 
Top