• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Is Jesus really God Or Gods created Son?

socharlie

Active Member
Respectfully, Jesus has not yet returned but yes He will return in the glory of the Father ... and every eye will see Him ...


It's about miracles. I'm not sure what you're aiming for here; if you want a more specific answer let me know.
does not Jesus put Self as Archetype? Archetype of Man Who Realized Christ Within as He says anyone who does like Him will become like Him?
 

74x12

Well-Known Member
does not Jesus put Self as Archetype? Archetype of Man Who Realized Christ Within as He says anyone who does like Him will become like Him?
I see,
Respectfully I disagree. I think that we should stress the part where Christ says "because I go to the Father". To me this implies that if Jesus stayed on earth; then He would do miracles so numerous and great that no one could hope to do greater ones. So, I don't see anyone becoming Christ that way. Only by grace can we hope to become like Him.
 

TransmutingSoul

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Respectfully, Jesus has not yet returned but yes He will return in the glory of the Father ... and every eye will see

Respect for each other is of Christ, this.I too share this in our discussions.

I personally see the event all Christains await, happened as a Thief in the night. I see the fulfillment is scriptural.

This OP about the Station of Jesus, is indeed an important aspect when discussing this topic.

Regards Tony
 

socharlie

Active Member
I see,
Respectfully I disagree. I think that we should stress the part where Christ says "because I go to the Father". To me this implies that if Jesus stayed on earth; then He would do miracles so numerous and great that no one could hope to do greater ones. So, I don't see anyone becoming Christ that way. Only by grace can we hope to become like Him.
but Jesus does not stay on Earth - realizing Christ He becomes part of Pneumatic world, which is happens to those who realize Christ within. Jesus went to the Father, so will happen to everyone who meet Jesus's condition - "he who believes in Me" Note that at that moment Jesus was Christ Jesus.
 
Debates about Jesus and the Father are pointless because Jesus says:

All things are delivered to me of my Father: and no man knoweth who the Son is, but the Father; and who the Father is, but the Son, and he to whom the Son will reveal him. (Luke 10:22)

So no one knows the who the Father is or who the Son is; and only Jesus can reveal it anyway. Anyone who says they figured it out on their own doesn't know what they're talking about. So if you want to know then you should pray about it and then seek the answer. Ask and you'll receive, seek and you will find knock and it will be opened to you.


Its not pointless right in this passage All things are delivered to me of my Father: Fulfilling Due 18:18 Jesus the ambassador.and no man knoweth who the Son is, but the Father; and who the Father is, but the Son, and he to whom the Son will reveal him. (Luke 10:22) Right there is the proof that one can know The Son reveals the relationship to the believer John 14:21 He that has my commandments and keeps them .He it is that loves me.He that loves me shall be loved of my Father And I will love him and manifest myself to him.

You see the phrase I will manifest my self to him. Manifest means to reveal.
 

74x12

Well-Known Member
Its not pointless right in this passage All things are delivered to me of my Father: Fulfilling Due 18:18 Jesus the ambassador.and no man knoweth who the Son is, but the Father; and who the Father is, but the Son, and he to whom the Son will reveal him. (Luke 10:22) Right there is the proof that one can know The Son reveals the relationship to the believer John 14:21 He that has my commandments and keeps them .He it is that loves me.He that loves me shall be loved of my Father And I will love him and manifest myself to him.

You see the phrase I will manifest my self to him. Manifest means to reveal.
Exactly. It's pointless to argue about it because only Jesus can reveal Himself and the Father. That was my whole point.
 
we know that Christ existed before Jesus was born.
Christ became man.
FWIW, "Mesa" is Egyptian name for crocodile oil that used to rub (anoint) the kings.
"Seventy 'sevens' are decreed for your people and your holy city to finish transgression, to put an end to sin, to atone for wickedness, to bring in everlasting righteousness, to seal up vision and prophecy and to anoint the Most Holy Place." what does it mean?

Go back and read all the reference scriptures I posted. Its all there your just missing it. In summary of those scriptures The Majesty On High created Jesus which means savior. 2 Tim 1:9 before the world was Jesus and Christ are the Same
Heb 2:14 Forasmuch then as the children are partakers of flesh and blood, he also himself likewise took part of the same. Jesus the Son of God who existed before the world was John 17:5 Was sent on a mission to save humanity.
When his time came to do the Majesty on highs work. The Majesty said Son its time to Go and do my will on earth. At that moment Jesus( The Savior) was transformed into flesh and blood and left his Fathers side in eternity. Again
Heb 2:17 Wherefore in all things it behoved him to be made like unto his brethren. That is made flesh and Blood.

There is no such thing as Christ the Son of God entering an existing human fetus. The Majesty transformed His only begotten Son into a fetus.

Ill talk about Dan 9:24 latter!​
 

socharlie

Active Member
Jesus is son of man has a

Go back and read all the reference scriptures I posted. Its all there your just missing it. In summary of those scriptures The Majesty On High created Jesus which means savior. 2 Tim 1:9 before the world was Jesus and Christ are the Same
Heb 2:14 Forasmuch then as the children are partakers of flesh and blood, he also himself likewise took part of the same. Jesus the Son of God who existed before the world was John 17:5 Was sent on a mission to save humanity.
When his time came to do the Majesty on highs work. The Majesty said Son its time to Go and do my will on earth. At that moment Jesus( The Savior) was transformed into flesh and blood and left his Fathers side in eternity. Again
Heb 2:17 Wherefore in all things it behoved him to be made like unto his brethren. That is made flesh and Blood.

There is no such thing as Christ the Son of God entering an existing human fetus. The Majesty transformed His only begotten Son into a fetus.

Ill talk about Dan 9:24 latter!​
Jesus is Son of Man he has birthday like all of us. Christ , Logos is Son of God. 14And the Word became flesh
31“I did not recognize Him, but so that He might be manifested to Israel, I came baptizing in water.” 32John testified saying, “I have seen the Spirit descending as a dove out of heaven, and He remained upon Him. 33“I did not recognize Him, but He who sent me to baptize in water said to me, ‘He upon whom you see the Spirit descending and remaining upon Him, this is the One who baptizes in the Holy Spirit.’ 34“I myself have seen, and have testified that this is the Son of God.”
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
There is no such thing as Christ the Son of God entering an existing human fetus. The Majesty transformed His only begotten Son into a fetus.

Ill talk about Dan 9:24 latter!​

I think the concept "Son" or "Father" are human-like and not god-like, and they don't explain the complex philosophy of the first Chapter of John. John and Philo of Alexandria are both philosophers who explain what Plato meant by demiurge : that is the Logos is not something distinct from matter, but one cannot exist without the other. That is, Mary's womb is not a means, by which Jesus came to being, but Jesus would have never existed without Mary. Without's Mary's Love, which allowed that (the Logos became flesh). Btw, in Luke, Elizabeth tells her clearly that Jesus is the fruit of her womb.
So the Logos became flesh (o Logos sarx egeneto), without God's intervention, but that Logos was nourished by Mary's blood.
 
Last edited:
I think the concept "Son" or "Father" are human-like and not god-like, One has to bear in mind Christians follow the teaching of the Apostle.Jesus laid the foundation( His words) they built upon it. So we dont get to insert our opinions. If they described a Father and Son relationship Then thats the reality, the truth. and they don't explain the complex philosophy of the first Chapter of John. What complexity. I dont see any complexity in the 1st Chapter of John.John and Philo of Alexandria are both philosophers John was not a philosopher but an I witness of Jesus 3 year ministry. So much of an I witness that we have 21 chapters of Jesus Life on earth. who explain what Plato meant by demiurge : John was not explaining Plato philosophy. The Greeks were all lost in Mythology . The Biblical God is based in reality. John was explaining the truth John 1:17 Truth came by Jesus Christ that is the Logos is not something distinct from matter, Incorrect Jesus the word existed before Matter. John 17:5 The glory I had with you before the world was. Thats before Matter but one cannot exist without the other. Incorrect John 17:5 just proves that incorrect That is, Mary's womb is not a means, by which Jesus came to being, but Jesus would have never existed without Mary. Your in error John 17:5 The glory I had with you before the world was. Since Jesus was before the world then he existed before Mary.Without's Mary's Love, which allowed that (the Logos became flesh). Jesus who existed before Mary and before the world John 17:5 was transformed into flesh and blood and inserted into Marys womb Heb 2:16-18. Btw, in Luke, Elizabeth tells her clearly that Jesus is the fruit of her womb .Because of all the other scripture I have been referencing (The doctrines of the Apostles not my opinions) one knows that Jesus came down from Heaven John 6:38 and Mary carried the transformed Jesus (into flesh and blood Heb 2:16-18 John 17:5) Elizabeth realizing that Marys Baby did not come from Mary, for Mary had not known a Man. Eleizabeth was just acknowledging Mary was carrying a Baby .Fruit is a figure of speech for baby. Not that Mary produced the Baby.
So the Logos became flesh (o Logos sarx egeneto), without God's intervention, Error Luke 1:35 The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee: Thats Gods Intervention but that Logos was nourished by Mary's blood.

Im begining to realize that you really dont beleive what the Apostle wrote. Its all write thier but for some reason you can see.

You say that "Logas is not distinct from Matter" and " Jesus would not have existed without Mary"

Yet John 17:5 Says The glory I had with you before the world was.

Can you see what that is plainly saying?????
 
Top