• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Does Paul Rub You the Wrong Way

fallingblood

Agnostic Theist
67 BCE is when Mithraism was started in the Roman Empire, centered in Tarsus.
No. That is not what your source said and I offered a complete rebuttal to that. There is no evidence it was centered in Tarsus, or that the worship of Mithras that was seen among those pirates had anything to do with the later mystery religion of Mithraism that was seen in the Roman Empire.

Your claim simply is false, as I demonstrated above.
 

wizanda

One Accepts All Religious Texts
Premium Member
What is it about his teachings that causes you disharmony?
Though here are a list of objective contradictions between Paul and Yeshua; what subjectively aggravates me about Paul is:

His overly eagerness to get into Heaven, and steal a crown to judge angels; its like pompous words are celebrated, and praised by the whole Christian community, who also like that self loving edification.

His sickness at creating a covenant with death, and thinking that suffices to claim the metaphysical.

That Paul pretends to be self loathing, and comes across to the naive that he is actually self analytical; when really he is just debating himself, why what he believes is right.

I respect, and at the same point loath how intelligently Paul has tried to circumnavigate Jewish Law, and reinstall the Jews as a chosen people, whilst grafting the Gentiles on to a cursed branch.

Lastly i can't stand how slimy Paul is as a person: he boasts, and yet claims not, he twists, and states he doesn't, he is spiteful, and yet claims sainthood, he is arrogant, and yet claims to be humble, etc.

In my opinion.
:innocent:
 

sandy whitelinger

Veteran Member
4I thank my God always concerning you for the grace of God which was given you in Christ Jesus, 5that in everything you were enriched in Him, in all speech and all knowledge, 6even as the testimony concerning Christ was confirmed in you, 7so that you are not lacking in any gift, awaiting eagerly the revelation of our Lord Jesus Christ, 8who will also confirm you to the end, blameless in the day of our Lord Jesus Christ. 9God is faithful, through whom you were called into fellowship with His Son, Jesus Christ our Lord.
1 Cor 1 Typical: in bold is to pneumatic , in italics is to psychics. even name of Jesus used differently and word for "knowledge" (in Greek, of course) too.
22For indeed Jews ask for signs and Greeks search for wisdom; Jews are symbol for psychic - natural, Greek - for pneumatic - spiritual.

14But a natural (psychic) man does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him; and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually appraised. 15But he who is spiritual appraises all things, yet he himself is appraised by no one 1 Cor 2
it is more clear in Greek. This is a typical example.
I think your interpretation of natural man is strange to me. Can you clarify your interpretation more?
 

sandy whitelinger

Veteran Member
Though here are a list of objective contradictions between Paul and Yeshua; what subjectively aggravates me about Paul is:

His overly eagerness to get into Heaven, and steal a crown to judge angels; its like pompous words are celebrated, and praised by the whole Christian community, who also like that self loving edification.

His sickness at creating a covenant with death, and thinking that suffices to claim the metaphysical.

That Paul pretends to be self loathing, and comes across to the naive that he is actually self analytical; when really he is just debating himself, why what he believes is right.

I respect, and at the same point loath how intelligently Paul has tried to circumnavigate Jewish Law, and reinstall the Jews as a chosen people, whilst grafting the Gentiles on to a cursed branch.

Lastly i can't stand how slimy Paul is as a person: he boasts, and yet claims not, he twists, and states he doesn't, he is spiteful, and yet claims sainthood, he is arrogant, and yet claims to be humble, etc.

In my opinion.
:innocent:
I read your link. I clearly use the English language a lot differently than the author.
 
.
.
You have asked :-
"What is it about the teachings of Paul that causes you disharmony?"

Christian pharisees perniciously confuse "The Word" (Jesus) with the words in the bible
That allows them to view everything in the bible as an equality
So the authority of Paul equals the authority of Jesus equals the authority of the most obscure prophet of the old covenant

The entire Creation and everything in it is in hierarchy
The most inconsequential statement of Jesus (God) has more authority than everything Paul wrote.
No statement of Paul's can be correctly interpreted unless you refer it to the authority teaching of Jesus to which it refers

Members of Paul's church sold everything they owned and gave the money to the poor
They handed their wages to the church elders who disbursed it back according to need
Every member was totally committed to incorporating Jesus' 40 commandments (Sermon On The Mount) into their lives

Any interpretation of Paul has to perceive a life lived according to Jesus' teaching
The most laughable aspect of the modern church is when they say they can't do something because it's not biblical or because it's against a teaching of Paul
Very little about the modern church is biblical and very few in it would qualify as members of Paul's church
.
.
 

wizanda

One Accepts All Religious Texts
Premium Member
I read your link. I clearly use the English language a lot differently than the author.
Since i wrote that years ago, and am far more articulate now a days; please ask, and will explain anything that is needed.
The Trinity, nor is the associated belief in the incarnate Son of God, are to be found in Judaism nor the Hebrew scripture. In fact the concept of the incarnate Son of God is against very fundamental beliefs of Judaism. There is no reference to the Trinity in Judaism. References often used by Christians in the Old Testament are a highly corrupted interpretations and at best vague.
You could do with studying what scholars put forward, and not what Jewish Tradition dictates:

Elyon - Wikipedia

Deuteronomy 32:7-9 Remember the days of old. Consider the years of many generations. Ask your father, and he will show you; your elders, and they will tell you. When the Most High gave to the nations their inheritance, when he separated the children of men, he set the bounds of the peoples according to the number of the children of 'God'. For Yahweh's portion is his people. Jacob is the lot of his inheritance.

Christians do not put forward the argument, there was a Divine Council of Elohim and One God Most High (El Elyon), scholars do; as the text shows two references in multiple places (2 Samuel 22:14 & Psalms 18:13, Psalms 50:14, Psalms 78:35, Psalms 92:1), as the Jews after the Babylonian Exile have been trying to follow a stricter form of monotheism, that didn't exist in the Tanakh.

Divine Council - Wikipedia

The ideas of an incarnation of YHVH Elohim 'becoming' 'Yeshua' Elohim (Psalms 98:3, Isaiah 52:10) is also throughout the Tanakh (H3444 + H1961 = Exodus 15:2-3, Psalms 118:14-21, Isaiah 12:2), and Jewish reading comprehension is to blame.

In my opinion. :innocent:
 

wizanda

One Accepts All Religious Texts
Premium Member
Not today.
Considering many of the posts in the thread, seem to not be able to distinguish Paul's own character, and Paul's teachings...

Depends what style of analysis you were asking for, and what understanding you want to result from the inquiry.

In my opinion. :innocent:
 

shunyadragon

shunyadragon
Premium Member
Since i wrote that years ago, and am far more articulate now a days; please ask, and will explain anything that is needed.

You could do with studying what scholars put forward, and not what Jewish Tradition dictates:

Elyon - Wikipedia

Deuteronomy 32:7-9 Remember the days of old. Consider the years of many generations. Ask your father, and he will show you; your elders, and they will tell you. When the Most High gave to the nations their inheritance, when he separated the children of men, he set the bounds of the peoples according to the number of the children of 'God'. For Yahweh's portion is his people. Jacob is the lot of his inheritance.

Christians do not put forward the argument, there was a Divine Council of Elohim and One God Most High (El Elyon), scholars do; as the text shows two references in multiple places (2 Samuel 22:14 & Psalms 18:13, Psalms 50:14, Psalms 78:35, Psalms 92:1), as the Jews after the Babylonian Exile have been trying to follow a stricter form of monotheism, that didn't exist in the Tanakh.

Divine Council - Wikipedia

The ideas of an incarnation of YHVH Elohim 'becoming' 'Yeshua' Elohim (Psalms 98:3, Isaiah 52:10) is also throughout the Tanakh (H3444 + H1961 = Exodus 15:2-3, Psalms 118:14-21, Isaiah 12:2), and Jewish reading comprehension is to blame.

In my opinion. :innocent:

Good thing you emphasize it is your opinion. For Example: The 'Divine Council' is a from older polytheistic/henotheistic Babylonian, Ugarit, and Canaanite mythology, which is also the problem that much of the Pentateuch found in older cuneiform tablets.

Jews realize that Judaism matures and evolved beyond this ancient polytheism/henotheism through Revelation that condemned these false beliefs, and idols based on these beliefs.

Christianity is retro unfortunately going back to ancient mythology, and Roman/Hellenist mythology, including as a basis for the Trinity, and in the Roman Church the role of Mary.
 

socharlie

Active Member
I think your interpretation of natural man is strange to me. Can you clarify your interpretation more?
Look Greek, not English. Gnostics traditionally separated human natures respecting spiritual attitude three ways:: pneumatic, psychic (natural in English translation) and hylic (material). That is what Paul did. That what Christ did (Prodigal Son story, for example).
 

wizanda

One Accepts All Religious Texts
Premium Member
Jews realize that Judaism matures
Actually Pharisaic/Rabbinic Judaism is a sect that existed since Babylon; that Yeshua came to remove, as they no longer accepted the God Most High, and that there is a Council of Elders...

Revelation repeats what exists, that there are 24 Elders around the throne; not some mythology.
that condemned these false beliefs
The idea you're calling false beliefs, what exists in the majority of Hebraic texts (Psalms 82), shows a confirmation bias.
The 'Divine Council' is a from older polytheistic/henotheistic Babylonian, Ugarit, and Canaanite mythology
The Divine Council as you're quoting from is polytheism/henotheism; what was taught in the Biblical texts is similar to what Krishna is stating, one God Most High, and then Elohim/Avatars that created reality (Oneness).

Modern Judaism is more like the Canaanites, as they no longer realize that YHVH is not a name; yet means the 'Lord to Be', and they no longer recognize the God Most High as the Source of reality.

Yet i don't expect you to question what an Avatar is telling you; as Baha'i has taught the same as Judaism believes, since no one bothered to double check their exegesis.

In my opinion. :innocent:
 
Last edited:

sandy whitelinger

Veteran Member
Resigning myself to the likelihood that I'm probably being played, what part of, "you don't have to try to be good to go to heaven", is too dense to understand? Repentance isn't even necessary according to Paul, only faith in Jesus--which Jesus and John the Baptist would dispute. Paul is a good socialist, he just makes stuff up, to wit:

Then there's the revelation from Jesus about the "Lord's Supper". What need had he of that? Hadn't Jesus already told the disciples, and they the church? The ancient Didache, the disciples handbook, has no mention of bread and wine being Jesus' body and blood, which Paul instituted via his "revelation". But Paul needed to meld it with the same pagan (cannibalim = Lord's Supper) rite practiced in Mithraism.
If this is what you offered as an explanation I fail to see much correlation to the hardly understood practices of Mithraism.
 

sandy whitelinger

Veteran Member
4I thank my God always concerning you for the grace of God which was given you in Christ Jesus, 5that in everything you were enriched in Him, in all speech and all knowledge, 6even as the testimony concerning Christ was confirmed in you, 7so that you are not lacking in any gift, awaiting eagerly the revelation of our Lord Jesus Christ, 8who will also confirm you to the end, blameless in the day of our Lord Jesus Christ. 9God is faithful, through whom you were called into fellowship with His Son, Jesus Christ our Lord.
1 Cor 1 Typical: in bold is to pneumatic , in italics is to psychics. even name of Jesus used differently and word for "knowledge" (in Greek, of course) too.
22For indeed Jews ask for signs and Greeks search for wisdom; Jews are symbol for psychic - natural, Greek - for pneumatic - spiritual.

14But a natural (psychic) man does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him; and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually appraised. 15But he who is spiritual appraises all things, yet he himself is appraised by no one 1 Cor 2
it is more clear in Greek. This is a typical example.
I see this as applicable to a degree. The sense that I was offering in the op is that it is like asking blind person to look at a photograph. Corinthians would seem to verify this but is contradicted by scripture that says every man is given a measure of faith. Can you reconcile this?
 

sandy whitelinger

Veteran Member
4I thank my God always concerning you for the grace of God which was given you in Christ Jesus, 5that in everything you were enriched in Him, in all speech and all knowledge, 6even as the testimony concerning Christ was confirmed in you, 7so that you are not lacking in any gift, awaiting eagerly the revelation of our Lord Jesus Christ, 8who will also confirm you to the end, blameless in the day of our Lord Jesus Christ. 9God is faithful, through whom you were called into fellowship with His Son, Jesus Christ our Lord.
1 Cor 1 Typical: in bold is to pneumatic , in italics is to psychics. even name of Jesus used differently and word for "knowledge" (in Greek, of course) too.
22For indeed Jews ask for signs and Greeks search for wisdom; Jews are symbol for psychic - natural, Greek - for pneumatic - spiritual.

14But a natural (psychic) man does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him; and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually appraised. 15But he who is spiritual appraises all things, yet he himself is appraised by no one 1 Cor 2
it is more clear in Greek. This is a typical example.
For some reason I thought this answer was part of my Predestination thread. What the hell does this have to do with Paul?
 

socharlie

Active Member
I see this as applicable to a degree. The sense that I was offering in the op is that it is like asking blind person to look at a photograph. Corinthians would seem to verify this but is contradicted by scripture that says every man is given a measure of faith. Can you reconcile this?
Can you rephrase you question? Faith is only initial gift that can grow into maturity through Gnosis. Faith is God's persuasion that we act upon to grow. Check 1 Cor. 13.
 
Top