Since we are at the “end times” what are the revelations of Daniel 12:10?

Hockeycowboy said:

Well then, let him do it, not you....we need to "adorn the teachings" (Titus 2:10) by our words and actions....draw people, not push them away.

Click to expand...

The testimony of Yeshua does not need adorning, nor does the Word of God. Now as for the words of Paul (Titus 2:10), which is about being a thief, there is not enough adornment to cover his hodgepodge of hypocrisy, and of his being all things to all men. As for JW’s drawing people, I am thinking if the home owner knew they were coming, they would be out visiting aunt Bessie.


The JWs maybe persistent in trying to roll that rock up the hill, but it keeps coming back down upon them. They apparently, unlike Sisyphus, don’t have to go to hell, to know what it is like. Unlike Sisyphus, the JWs have an additional two stumbling blocks, Peter and Paul.

Deeje said:

Perhaps you need to re-read the gospels and see what attracted people to what Jesus taught. You are nothing like him.....Peter said to those who are "called".......

Click to expand...

What attracted the people was that he worked miracles, and healed them by the power of God. He also was known to feed them. Changing water to wine didn't hurt. For the most part, people didn't understand his parables (Matthew 13:13), but being healed was worth the trip.

2ndpillar said:

The testimony of Yeshua does not need adorning, nor does the Word of God. Now as for the words of Paul (Titus 2:10), which is about being a thief, there is not enough adornment to cover his hodgepodge of hypocrisy, and of his being all things to all men. As for JW’s drawing people, I am thinking if the home owner knew they were coming, they would be out visiting aunt Bessie.


The JWs maybe persistent in trying to roll that rock up the hill, but it keeps coming back down upon them. They apparently, unlike Sisyphus, don’t have to go to hell, to know what it is like. Unlike Sisyphus, the JWs have an additional two stumbling blocks, Peter and Paul.

Click to expand...

I am wondering: just what books of the Bible, do you accept? Why?

Hockeycowboy said:

I am wondering: just what books of the Bible, do you accept? Why?

Click to expand...

You simply have to separate the wheat from the chaff, the "good seed" from the "tare" seed, the wheat from the leaven, and throw out the leaven. As Paul is a false prophet, you can pretty well strike that pretty boy and his buddies. If anything isn’t in line with the Law and the prophets, it is from darkness (Isaiah 8:20). If some matter doesn’t have at least two witnesses, it cannot be established (Matthew 18:16) & (Dt 19:15). It is just not a matter of books, but of the material within the books published by the “daughter of Babylon”. If you don’t want to do the leg work, stick with the Scriptures, the Law and the prophets. It worked for Yeshua, who stated that the “Scriptures” could not be broken. He also stated that the “tare” seed would be mixed with the good seed, the “word of the kingdom” (Matthew 13:19) together in the same "field". The tare seed stated that the “old” was “obsolete”, which would place that as being from darkness.