The Bible, like the works of all revealed religions, is history with a fictional overlay. And that, being a lie, means the rest of it can't be trusted without independent validation. Yes, they often do contain some philosophical Truth, but that needs reasoned validation as well. Faith validates nothing, just the opposite.
I agree that the Bible is history with a fictional overlay. I do not know that much about the Qur’an or the works of other revealed religions but the Baha’i Faith history has no fictional overlay since it is recent history that can be verified.
I appreciate how you think logically.
I saw that from the first post I read that you wrote. Yes, the philosophical truth in the Bible, what I refer to as spiritual truth, needs to be validated. The only reason I believe in Moses and Jesus is because Baha’u’llah referred to them and validated them, but that does not mean the Bible is accurate history.
Jesus has had more words put in his mouth than probably anyone else in history.
Ain’t that the painful truth.
God must be One and omnipresent. Sending "messengers"/angels is just more anthropomorphism. Any personal God would be one looking over your shoulder, influencing your moral choices and thus negating your free will. Deism, given its definition and the purpose for God's laissez-faire, makes blending it with theism impossible.
I believe that God is One and God is omnipresent, but God is not anthropomorphic. Why do you think that “sending” Messengers is anthropomorphism? The reason God sends them is because God cannot become a man, so there is no other way for God to communicate His Will to man in such a way that all people can receive it and understand it. But God forever remains hidden.
The reason I said that I am
a cross between a theist and a deist is because I believe in a God that knows everything about us and cares about us, but I do not believe in a God that intervenes as so many Christians believe. For example, a Christian says that God got them a job as if
God actually did that, where I would say they got a job by making free will decisions and acting upon them. God does not cause things to happen although God knows what we will do before we ever do it.
Why do you think a personal God would be looking over our shoulder, influencing our moral choices and thus negating our free will? I believe God
knows all our thoughts and is closer to us than we are to ourselves, but that does not mean God wants to influence our moral choices. The reason we have free will is so we can make our own moral choices. God does not intervene. Although God might prevent some of our free will choices from coming to fruition, we can never know if/when that happens because we can
never know what God is doing. This is the beef I have with some Christians who say
God did something in their life. I think this is rather naïve.
I was a deist for many years who believed in fate, prophesy and divine providence. It was like the trauma when I went through when I abandoned Christianity when I finally let myself listen to the other shoe drop. We don't know because we mustn't know....in this life. And the doubt rests a little easier on our shoulders when we finally realize that. It's not a contradiction, but it is a mystery.
I guess you mean you went from a Christian to a deist and then from a deist to an agnostic, and that was like the other shoe dropping. People use the word agnostic to mean different things. For some it means that they don’t know if God exists or not and for others it means we cannot ever know if God exists... I guess you are the latter.
So do you think we are
not meant to know in this mortal life but that we will know in the afterlife? Can you imagine going through this life not knowing that God exists only later to find out God does exist and that there was a reason for our mortal existence we never knew about?
Other believers get after me because I say “I know God exists” because they say I can only believe, I cannot know. I agree that God is a mystery and we cannot know God exists in the sense of having proof, but a person can know in a sense of having inner certitude. The reason I know is because of the evidence, not because of any personal spiritual experience. I was an agnostic before I was a Baha’i.
I do not base my beliefs upon emotions. I do not have feelings about God, just beliefs. I believe God is personal but I do not have a personal relationship with God because I do not think that is possible or desirable. God is exalted beyond anything that can ever be recounted or perceived so God does not have any relationships with humans. That is anthropomorphism. I believe that after we die we will be able to get closer to God but there is no way we can understand what that means until we get there.