• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

December 25th

Grandliseur

Well-Known Member
Unless we, again, are misinterpreting each other :D

The Word is uncreated as He is God... the body know as Jesus was created.
Well, that is not what scripture tells me. I do not believe in the trinity. But, I don't think scriptures will persuade you to my point of view.
I understand Jesus in his prehuman form to be the firstborn of all creation.

Others believe as they want, but if you want scriptures ask me.
 

Muffled

Jesus in me
Apparently on this day 2017 years ago GOD Almighty had a baby. I don't know about anyone else, but even just saying it feels weird and plain wrong, going against our innate understanding about the Most Hgh.

From the perspective of the northern hemisphere, the sun appears to move south and get smaller and scarcer. The shortening of the days and the expiration of the crops when approaching the winter solstice symbolised the process of death to the ancients. It was the death of the Sun. By December 22nd, the Sun’s demise was fully realised, for the Sun, having moved south continually for 6 months, makes it to it’s lowest point in the sky. Here a curious thing occurs: the Sun stops moving south, at least perceivably, for 3 days. During this 3 day pause, the Sun resides in the vicinity of the Southern Cross, or Crux, constellation. And after this time on December 25th, the Sun moves 1 degree, this time north, foreshadowing longer days, warmth, and Spring. And thus it was said: the Sun died on the cross, was dead for 3 days, only to be resurrected or born again.

2hcqnbc.jpg


zx319t.jpg


Qur'an 9:30 & 31
"....... the Christians say, "The Messiah is the son of Allah ." That is their statement from their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved [before them]. May Allah destroy them; how are they deluded?"

"They have taken their scholars and monks as lords besides Allah, and [also] the Messiah, the son of Mary. And they were not commanded except to worship one God; there is no deity except Him. Exalted is He above whatever they associate with Him."

Happy Holidays for all those with time off work, I hope you have a great family get together, but never could I ever wish anyone a merry xmas given what it's supposed to symbolise. No offence meant.

I believe Muslims are delusional in believing that the quoted verse means that jesus is not the son of God. It would be nice if God explained things to you a little better but He does what He wants.
 

Muffled

Jesus in me
No, Xmas Day, ie 25th December, is a convenient time for a holiday - it used to be a Pagan Festival that was hijacked by Christians.

I think most Christians claim JC was born in the Spring

I believe then that those Christians are dead wrong.

I believe Christians have never celebrated a pagan festival.
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
Well, that is not what scripture tells me. I do not believe in the trinity. But, I don't think scriptures will persuade you to my point of view.
I understand Jesus in his prehuman form to be the firstborn of all creation.

Others believe as they want, but if you want scriptures ask me.
Yes... as I mentioned before, a great Theological discussion where each will be convinced by their own position. I remember taking a course on the Trinity where just when we were convinced of the Trinity a scripture would throw us in a loop. And just when we were conivince on their not being a Trinity, a scripture would throw us in a loop.

My greatest conviction comes by the example of man...a triune being--spirit, soul and body. Each separate in purpose and in materiality yet the three are one.

For me (and I repeat for me), it is the greatest on earth example of the God of Creation who made man in His image and in His likeness... a mystery.
 

Grandliseur

Well-Known Member
by the example of man...a triune being--spirit, soul and body
Here too, I can demonstrate to you that by scripture, the soul is the entire human being similar to saying the doctor refers to all of that human that if he dies, the doctor is dead, the soul is dead.

I really don't think anyone can solve this problem until after the kingdom has arrived. In general, people shall continue to be Trinitarians no matter what.

As I said, if you want scriptures, I will be happy to oblige, though, I don't think it shall change what most people believe.
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
Here too, I can demonstrate to you that by scripture, the soul is the entire human being similar to saying the doctor refers to all of that human that if he dies, the doctor is dead, the soul is dead.

I really don't think anyone can solve this problem until after the kingdom has arrived. In general, people shall continue to be Trinitarians no matter what.

As I said, if you want scriptures, I will be happy to oblige, though, I don't think it shall change what most people believe.
LOL..

Likewise...

If you wan't scriptures, I will be happy to oblige.

Certainly scirpture is clear that the soul is not the entire being... but we don't have to argue the point. We remain in Shalom
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
If you should like, here is a study of mine:
Truth Seeker - Soul--Immortal? Animals?
That was interesting...

Certainly, I will agree with your position that animals have souls too.

I can't agree with the statement that souls are mortal... I believe they are intertwined with the spirit and thus, is also eternal.

For an example: Psalms 16:10 For thou wilt not leave my soul in hell; neither wilt thou suffer thine Holy One to see corruption.

It would seem incongruous to have a soul being mortal yet it would still live after death.

I believe the problem lies within the definition of death. In Genesis 2, death is actually in the plural. In my view, death is just the absense of the life of God so a soul that is separated from God is still alive but living a life that is dead.
 

Grandliseur

Well-Known Member
I will agree with your position that animals have souls too.
I simply quote scriptures and accept what they teach. In this then, it is not my position but the scriptural teaching coming from God who has this position. :D

As to what others believe, once they have seen what I present and have another opinion than mine - what's new!!! :D We all have to shape our opinions from our input, our own opinions.

It used to be that people would speak about our 'mortal souls.' Not so much anymore.
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
I simply quote scriptures and accept what they teach. In this then, it is not my position but the scriptural teaching coming from God who has this position. :D
And yet, I just posted one that ran crossgrain with your position. :D Do you sift those scriptures out? :D

As to what others believe, once they have seen what I present and have another opinion than mine - what's new!!! :D We all have to shape our opinions from our input, our own opinions.

It used to be that people would speak about our 'mortal souls.' Not so much anymore.
Perhaps because they came to realize that the soul was immortal because it is one with the second portion of man.. the eternal spirit :D
 

Grandliseur

Well-Known Member
And yet, I just posted one that ran crossgrain with your position. :D Do you sift those scriptures out? :D


Perhaps because they came to realize that the soul was immortal because it is one with the second portion of man.. the eternal spirit :D
You mentioned Psalms 16:10. That is true.
10 For thou wilt not leave my soul to Sheol, neither wilt thou allow thy Holy One to see corruption. (Darby)​
I never ignore scriptures. However, it is a must for us to use a harmonious interpretation of scripture. In the link you just read, several scriptures mentioned that the soul dies. Here are just two of these:
Numbers 23:10 . . . can count the dust of Jacob, and the number of the fourth part of Israel? Let my soul die the death of the righteous, and let my end be like his! (Darby)

Psalm 78:50, He made a way to his anger; he spared not their soul from death, but gave their life over to the pestilence. (KJV)​
If the soul dies, then it is mortal.

I am not going to dictate to you what kind of conclusions you make based on scripture, that is entirely up to you. It makes no big difference to me.

Please read this link also and see what it says about the dead:
Truth Seeker - Judgment & Sheol

If you still think the soul a part of us that lives on, that is fine with me. I have my own logic and conclusions on this. I simply try to assist.
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
You mentioned Psalms 16:10. That is true.
10 For thou wilt not leave my soul to Sheol, neither wilt thou allow thy Holy One to see corruption. (Darby)​
I never ignore scriptures. However, it is a must for us to use a harmonious interpretation of scripture. In the link you just read, several scriptures mentioned that the soul dies. Here are just two of these:
Numbers 23:10 . . . can count the dust of Jacob, and the number of the fourth part of Israel? Let my soul die the death of the righteous, and let my end be like his! (Darby)

Psalm 78:50, He made a way to his anger; he spared not their soul from death, but gave their life over to the pestilence. (KJV)​
If the soul dies, then it is mortal.

I am not going to dictate to you what kind of conclusions you make based on scripture, that is entirely up to you. It makes no big difference to me.

Please read this link also and see what it says about the dead:
Truth Seeker - Judgment & Sheol

If you still think the soul a part of us that lives on, that is fine with me. I have my own logic and conclusions on this. I simply try to assist.
Here, trying to help you.

Numbers... talks about living in the body and not after the body dies.
Psalms... "gave their life over to pestilence" obviously talking about while in the body.

You see, you can't make your position the strainer and strain all the parts that don't fit into your opinons. You make the word the strainer and throw out the opinons :D
 

Grandliseur

Well-Known Member
Here, trying to help you.

Numbers... talks about living in the body and not after the body dies.
Psalms... "gave their life over to pestilence" obviously talking about while in the body.

You see, you can't make your position the strainer and strain all the parts that don't fit into your opinons. You make the word the strainer and throw out the opinons :D
Each has to reach his or her own conclusions. As long as we serve God to the extend we can, it matters little if we differ on issues like this. Obedience to his edicts will lead to approval.
 

Faithofchristian

Well-Known Member
Apparently on this day 2017 years ago GOD Almighty had a baby. I don't know about anyone else, but even just saying it feels weird and plain wrong, going against our innate understanding about the Most Hgh.

From the perspective of the northern hemisphere, the sun appears to move south and get smaller and scarcer. The shortening of the days and the expiration of the crops when approaching the winter solstice symbolised the process of death to the ancients. It was the death of the Sun. By December 22nd, the Sun’s demise was fully realised, for the Sun, having moved south continually for 6 months, makes it to it’s lowest point in the sky. Here a curious thing occurs: the Sun stops moving south, at least perceivably, for 3 days. During this 3 day pause, the Sun resides in the vicinity of the Southern Cross, or Crux, constellation. And after this time on December 25th, the Sun moves 1 degree, this time north, foreshadowing longer days, warmth, and Spring. And thus it was said: the Sun died on the cross, was dead for 3 days, only to be resurrected or born again.

2hcqnbc.jpg


zx319t.jpg


Qur'an 9:30 & 31
"....... the Christians say, "The Messiah is the son of Allah ." That is their statement from their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved [before them]. May Allah destroy them; how are they deluded?"

"They have taken their scholars and monks as lords besides Allah, and [also] the Messiah, the son of Mary. And they were not commanded except to worship one God; there is no deity except Him. Exalted is He above whatever they associate with Him."

Happy Holidays for all those with time off work, I hope you have a great family get together, but never could I ever wish anyone a merry xmas given what it's supposed to symbolise. No offence meant.

[/QUOTE\]

That's because Muhammad had no understanding and pass his lack of knowledge and understanding on down.
Why Jesus came here in this world.

It's all written down throughout the Old Testaments, Why Jesus was sent into this world.
Muhammad couldn't possibly know this, seeing he couldn't read or write.
 

oldbadger

Skanky Old Mongrel!
We have two pertinent facts in Luke, one which I leave to you to read yourself, which was the Mary and Joseph were compelled by the authorities to travel to Bethlehem,..............................
Why would very efficient Romans order folks in Galilee to go to Bethlehem to register for taxation? Antipas had his own publicans and senior tax officers in Galilee... and his system was not interferred with when a Roman Prefect was installed in Idumea, Judea and Samaria.! ??
How could a Galilean peasant handworker be related to a Royal? Most Galileans were recent converts by comparison with Judeans.
How could Joseph/Mary travel to Judea in 6CE to have a baby there if Herod (who died 4BC) was supposed to still be alive after the birth? There's a ten year gap!

Luke's account, a non witness, non Galilean etc was very wobbly about the nativity, don't you think?
 

Grandliseur

Well-Known Member
Why would very efficient Romans order folks in Galilee to go to Bethlehem to register for taxation? Antipas had his own publicans and senior tax officers in Galilee... and his system was not interferred with when a Roman Prefect was installed in Idumea, Judea and Samaria.! ??
How could a Galilean peasant handworker be related to a Royal? Most Galileans were recent converts by comparison with Judeans.
How could Joseph/Mary travel to Judea in 6CE to have a baby there if Herod (who died 4BC) was supposed to still be alive after the birth? There's a ten year gap!

Luke's account, a non witness, non Galilean etc was very wobbly about the nativity, don't you think?
While there seems to be difficulties with the chronology between the Bible and the secular historians, I just accept the Bible. If doing so means that Jesus was born about 2BC, October 1 plus minus two weeks is the result, that is what I go with.

Maybe I should see if I could get the fuzziness out of my head and restudy the issue; however, no matter how well I might be able to establish things - other people have their own ideas and beliefs, so it would benefit none even if I could do this.

Even when I give good Biblical answers here, most of them are rejected by the crowd here who is mostly not interested in this kind of evidence from the Bible. In this I know that this is as has been foretold. After I am gone, it is said that a time shall come when large numbers are going to frantically search for God, when all things collapse, and not find him. It might be fun to watch from the sidelines. This next scripture just tells me to keep speaking until all are gone, in death. Most shall die soon.
Isaiah 6: 9 And he said, Go; and thou shalt say unto this people, Hearing ye shall hear and shall not understand, and seeing ye shall see and shall not perceive. 10 Make the heart of this people fat, and make their ears heavy, and blind their eyes; lest they see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and understand with their heart, and be converted, and healed. 11 And I said, Lord, how long? And he said, Until the cities be wasted, without inhabitant, and the houses without man, and the land become an utter desolation, 12 and Jehovah have removed men far away, and the solitude be great in the midst of the land.

 

oldbadger

Skanky Old Mongrel!
While there seems to be difficulties with the chronology between the Bible and the secular historians, I just accept the Bible. If doing so means that Jesus was born about 2BC, October 1 plus minus two weeks is the result, that is what I go with.
Fair enough..............
If that is what you believe, fair enough.

Maybe I should see if I could get the fuzziness out of my head and restudy the issue; however, no matter how well I might be able to establish things - other people have their own ideas and beliefs, so it would benefit none even if I could do this.
You could do it for yourself?
If you have lost track of your truth it would be a good journey of rediscovery?

Even when I give good Biblical answers here, most of them are rejected by the crowd here who is mostly not interested in this kind of evidence from the Bible.
This is true........... some of the evidence in the bible is weak, some is strong. Many in the crowd do not trust it now.

In this I know that this is as has been foretold. After I am gone, it is said that a time shall come when large numbers are going to frantically search for God, when all things collapse, and not find him. It might be fun to watch from the sidelines. This next scripture just tells me to keep speaking until all are gone, in death. Most shall die soon.
Fun? Those that watch from the sidelines, enjoying the view, will fail at the last. The First shall be Last, and the Last shall be First.
 
Top