Ajit Pai doxxed. Not always the best way to go about things.

While I understand the frustration and anger over net neutrality, going to these extremes before everything is said and done, is an irresponsible and dangerous act imo.

Some of the disclosed information almost certainly puts Ajit life in danger and his family whom in themselves has nothing to do with any of the policies and dictates Ajit has put forward on the nation. I'm pretty sure the FBI is looking into the matter.

Net neutrality still has to go through Congress and the Supreme Court so I don't understand this knee-jerk action.


What are your thoughts on the matter?

I'm immediately suspicious as net neutrality advocates have already created a network of fake comments (using real identities) so it would not at all surprise me if this was a false flag looking to garner some last minute sympathy or delays.

All the same, wholeheartedly condemn doxxing, whomever is responsible.

This was obviously going to happen, there was no way it wouldn't happen.
There was also no way he didn't see this coming.

The pro-gigantic corporation/anti net neutrality people committed massive fraud in the comments in effect lying about how many want to hand power to the mega-ISPs., Patil admitted to being a tody for Verizon and then did a truly stupid Jedi thing.

I don't agree with doxxing but he's a serious member of the plutocratic swamp in the current regime.

And the more they trample on freedom, the more they lie and steal as they do every day, the greater the anger will become and the more direct action will occur. The more they destroy America, the more they take away what is ours to hand to the plutocrats and gigantic corporations, the more they s*** on the poor and middle class in favor of the super rich, the worse the reaction will become. The reaction is just starting.

Sow the wind and reap the whirlwind.

No, he shouldn't be doxxed, neither does 42 members of his family.

Anonymous should ask themselves if they mind being doxxed. Given their name, I would assume not.

The FCC cannot take the moral high ground on this issue. That said, no harm should come to anyone over this.

What is pro neutrality?where do liberals stand on nuetrality?is this guy liberal or republican?what does repealing neutrality do?

Riders said:

What is pro neutrality?where do liberals stand on nuetrality?is this guy liberal or republican?what does repealing neutrality do?

Click to expand...

There are plenty of sources that can break this down much better than I can. Take a peek at youtube and search for something along the lines of "What is Net Neutrality?" It can be confusing but that will give you a starting point.

Thankyou

I saw it.Im pro neutrality Trump is antinutrality because he's for big business.

Websight is free speech all websights should have the same visibility be able to be seen.

Charging them means we only see websights for big Monet retailers unless we really look for it.Its a matter of free speech.
I hope Trump got stung by this.

Riders said:

What is pro neutrality?where do liberals stand on nuetrality?is this guy liberal or republican?what does repealing neutrality do?

Click to expand...

Pai was appointed by Obama for the FCC and Trump promoted him to chairman.

Net neutrality deals with regulations that were in place treating internet services in the same manner as utilities. Ajit Pai wanted to remove FCC regulations giving ISP and other's free reign in the way internet content is distributed, allows throttling service's giving faster bandwidth preference to higher paying customers and no restriction on the costs they can charge. Essentially giving over the internet to the whims of for profit corporation's.