I'm actually quite surprised that, in another thread, I posted something that I was certain would raise some serious discussion -- and yet, for over a week, it has remained the last post in the thread -- silence!
I said:
Is this a lie? Is it misleading? Or is it just that humans didn't have the heart to delete the old words when thy decided on some new ones?
I said:
There are different sorts of covenants in the Bible, but I think the important ones are:To add one more comment to my thoughts on a "New Covenant," I just need to point out that God, being outside of time and therefore omniscient about past, present and future, knew of a certainty when he made the Old Covenant, that he was lying through his metaphorical teeth, since he knew he was planning to replace it.
How does that square with your exegesis?
- Noah -- never to destroy the earth again, that one's just a promise by God, not a two-sided agreement
- Abrahamic -- God promises that Abraham's descendants will always be God's chosen people, and that He will always be their God.
- The "New Covenant" through Christ, which Christians believe replaces the "Old Covenant" (the Abrahamic one).
Is this a lie? Is it misleading? Or is it just that humans didn't have the heart to delete the old words when thy decided on some new ones?