• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

How are these Great Beings explained?

Unveiled Artist

Veteran Member
Sure, but that is not what Christians believe.

I actually only met one person who believed jesus is the creator. Most believe he is god by his divinity not by being a creator. Catholics differientate the father and son since they kinda sorta go by jewish outlook. JW are not trinitarians.

Scripture does not say he is god/creator. Chriet distinctively separated himself to where he was the son not he father.

That is what Vaishnavite Hindus believe but like the Christian belief I doubt if it is really true.

Vishnavites dont spreak for all Hindus. Also, the avatar is a human incarnation of god. Not a promised one. Just god in human form.

Taking out Hindu specifics. How can god return when god is already here?

To answer that we need to better understand the divinity of Christ, and How He can be God, and How He is not God. It sounds like a contradiction, but it isn't.

I know he is god but not the creator. I never saw the contradiction. Catholics see god the father and god the son. The dove over the Eucharist is the one from god blessing christ in concecration of the Eucharist. Christ doesnt concecrate himself.

The connection is there just some mistake jesus connection with the father with that of him sharing his fathers divinity.

As John the Baptist came as the spirit of Elijiah, we have the One who comes forth in the Spirit of Christ. Same type of Spirit, different body, different person.

If christ rose only in spirit, how does his spirit return when "his spirit is already here"?
 

Vinayaka

devotee
Premium Member
How much is witheld from the world?
Yes, I've wondered that a few times. Nov. 4 was the death anniversary of the so called 'Guardian', yet no mention at all. Maybe it was too controversial to bring it all up again. I really don't know. I expect most people don't know, including the majority of Baha'i's themselves. What you write here might be news to some.
 

Dawnofhope

Non-Proselytizing Baha'i
Staff member
Premium Member
I actually only met one person who believed jesus is the creator. Most believe he is god by his divinity not by being a creator. Catholics differientate the father and son since they kinda sorta go by jewish outlook. JW are not trinitarians.

Scripture does not say he is god/creator. Chriet distinctively separated himself to where he was the son not he father.

Many Christians belief that Jesus is literally God incarnate though. That's what it says in John 1:1-3 and many Christians takes these words literally.

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
The same was in the beginning with God.
All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made
.

So Jesus was the Word, He was not only with God, but He was God, and He was the Creator.

I and my Father are one.
John 10:30

If Jesus was not God the Creator, how could He rise from the dead and rise to the heavens? For according to Christian belief, Jesus is not only the Son, but God incarnate, because the Son and the Father are One.

That is not what you and I believe, but it is what many of the Christians believe.

Vishnavites dont spreak for all Hindus.

I took that message on board about 6 months ago, thanks to Vinayaka.

Also, the avatar is a human incarnation of god. Not a promised one. Just god in human form.

A human incarnation? Not a Divine incarnation? I though Krishna was God! How can that be?

Maybe promised isn't the right word.....here's the verse

Whenever there is a decline in righteousness, O Bharat, and the rise of irreligion, it is then that I send forth My spirit.
For the salvation of the good, the destruction of the evil-doers, and for firmly establishing righteousness, I manifest myself from age to age.



Taking out Hindu specifics. How can god return when god is already here?

Answer the question how could John the Baptist be Elijah when Elijah had died centuries before and you that might help.

I know he is god but not the creator. I never saw the contradiction. Catholics see god the father and god the son. The dove over the Eucharist is the one from god blessing christ in concecration of the Eucharist. Christ doesnt concecrate himself.

The connection is there just some mistake jesus connection with the father with that of him sharing his fathers divinity.

Sure, but Christians believe it, and we are not Christians. Their belief must be true, right?

If christ rose only in spirit, how does his spirit return when "his spirit is already here"?

According to the Christians It was Christ in His entirety that rose, body, spirit and everything else, and that is what will return.

Not our belief, but the Christian belief. Same deal for Krishna being the incarnation of God.
 

InvestigateTruth

Well-Known Member

3 And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast.
.​
The heads of the beast, as Abdulbaha explained are the dominions, based on the Areas that the false Islam of Caliphs ruled:


"...the seven heads and seven crowns represent the seven dominions and kingdoms over which they came to rule: the Roman dominion in Syria; the Persian, the Arabian, and the Egyptian dominions; the dominion of Africa—that is, Tunisia, Morocco, and Algeria; the dominion of Andalusia, which is now Spain; and the dominion of the Turkish tribes of Transoxania.."
Abdulbaha, some answered questions.

The wounded head is a reference to one of the dominions. My take is, that is the Arabian dominion. In this Arabian dominion, at the same time the Shia Imams were teaching the true Islam. Their word was like Sword of Truth against the Falsehood that the Umayids and Abbasids were spreading in this region. By their Sword, the Head of the falsehood was wounded till year 260AH, when the last Imam of Shia passed away, and the falsehood of Umayids survived or healed in the Arabian domains after passing of the 11th Imam.​
 

CG Didymus

Veteran Member
The Bible contains the Word of God, that word though having some semblance in the material world, is a Spiritual Message, to give us Spiritual Understanding.

We are all mostly.spiritually illiterate, that is why God gives us the Great Beings and ask us to.learn from them. First their Person and their life and if that is not enough, the Word they give.

So as to Physical and Spiritual Meaning this one quote from Baha'u'llah is entirly for our Spirit to grasp to prevent material consequenses.

"The world is in travail, and its agitation waxeth day by day. Its face is turned towards waywardness and unbelief. Such shall be its plight, that to disclose it now would not be meet and seemly. Its perversity will long continue. And when the appointed hour is come, there shall suddenly appear that which shall cause the limbs of mankind to quake. Then, and only then, will the Divine Standard be unfurled, and the Nightingale of Paradise warble its melody."

So following points all have many meanings;

The world is in Travil!?
Its agitation waxeth day by day?
Limbs if Mankind to Quake?
The Divine Standard?
Nightingale of Paradise?
Warble its Melody?

It is up to us to pull from that verse what it means.

This is also applicable with all other scriptures. With Prophecy the coming Mesenger fulfill the meanings.

RegardsTony
Let's not say the "Bible", because what is usually meant is the Christian version. So let's just look at the NT. Who wrote it? A prophet/manifestation? Who declared it as the "Word" of God? The very same Christians that Baha'is say have interpreted the NT incorrectly. So how would they know it's the Word of God? How did they know which gospels and epistles to include? God guided them in that but didn't guide them in the interpretation?
 

Unveiled Artist

Veteran Member
Many Christians belief that Jesus is literally God incarnate though. That's what it says in John 1:1-3 and many Christians takes these words literally.

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
The same was in the beginning with God.
All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made
.

So Jesus was the Word, He was not only with God, but He was God, and He was the Creator.

I and my Father are one.
John 10:30

Why do people always use these verses to prove jesus is god?

Jesus is called the Word because he is the incarnation of his father's message to the jews and gentiles. The message was the salvation of god/father's people through the life, death, and resurrection of his son. It's also a play on words. Word (divine message; caps) compared to words, like that of scripture.

Jesus answered, “It is written: ‘Man shall not live on bread alone, but on every word that comes from the mouth of God.’” Matthew 4:4

The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the one and only Son, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.
John 1:14
Prepositions are helpful as well as conjunctions help with differentiating the father and the son.

As a result of being the incarnation of his father's message, whatever christ says is what the creator says. It's simple logistics. You have a sender. You have a messenger. You have an audience. What connects the sender to the messenger is a shared divinity; that is what makes the two One (another play on words; aka metaphor).

If my mother told me to tell you to take out the trash, that message is not from me, it is from my mother. Because I am her daughter, I have a relationship with my mother. Given we are connected by blood, we are One.

Somewhere on RF I listed sooo many scriptures on this that no one even rebutted me on any of it. Always happens.

If Jesus was not God the Creator, how could He rise from the dead and rise to the heavens? For according to Christian belief, Jesus is not only the Son, but God incarnate, because the Son and the Father are One.

Because the father rose him to sit at his right side (not his own right side).

1 Corinthians 6:14 Now God has not only raised the Lord, but will also raise us up through His power.

Ephesians 1:20 which He brought about in Christ, when He raised Him from the dead and seated Him at His right hand in the heavenly places,​

I honestly don't make this up. I actually remember these things I studied but don't have the brain energy to remember the verses. I was never a fundy in my Catholic days.

That is not what you and I believe, but it is what many of the Christians believe.

The christian teaching is the father/creator sent his son/human to be incarnation of his/father's Word/oral dictations of salvation. Once the Word/oral dictations became flesh/christ, then his/creator's message can "walk among the people" and actually interact with them. So, in that interaction, the incarnation/the creator's word, was one with the person who sent the word thereby whoever is saved in christ is forgiven by the father/creator.

As for what individual christians believe. I live among a lot and I mean a lot of christians. They just finished having Korean bible service and singing just a moment ago in the party room, actually. When christians say jesus is god, they are talking about his divinity in perfection.

I took that message on board about 6 months ago, thanks to Vinayaka.

Haha. Just reminding you. :D

A human incarnation? Not a Divine incarnation? I though Krishna was God! How can that be?

Krishna is god. I just don't see how being an incarnation makes god any different. What new message does god bring all because he becomes an incarnation of himself? (going by bahai logic)

Whenever there is a decline in righteousness, O Bharat, and the rise of irreligion, it is then that I send forth My spirit. For the salvation of the good, the destruction of the evil-doers, and for firmly establishing righteousness, I manifest myself from age to age.

Sorry. You have to get @Vinayaka to confirm validity of that. In my opinion just by reading it, sounds edit Krishna was an incarnation of Vishnu so that Krishna can bring destruction of the evil-doers.

But then again, words like "evil-doers" and "destruction" have different meanings in Hinduism than it does in Abrahamic view. I mean, The Buddha's suttas use the word sin but the sin, in buddhism, doesn't mean going against god. It just means wrong doing or more, um, there is a better word just can't think of it right now.

Answer the question how could John the Baptist be Elijah when Elijah had died centuries before and you that might help.

How can the spirit of christ come down when christ is already here? Is what I asked. Elijah is not here. That's the difference.

Sure, but Christians believe it, and we are not Christians. Their belief must be true, right?

When I was at the Church, the only god I knew was christ in the Eucharist. How I understood it was the divinity of god/holy spirit came upon the bread/life and wine/blood sacrifice to bring present people in christ. When people come together in Christ to celebrate the Eucharist, it makes god/creator present by his spirit/which is holy.

That, I know is true.

As far as god/father being a separate being; now, that, I do not believe.

According to the Christians It was Christ in His entirety that rose, body, spirit and everything else, and that is what will return.

Yes, body's can raise by the power of god. *Cough* *Cough* You didn't hear that from me. Yes, that's what Christians believe. We have our different opinions but to present our opinions/beliefs as facts and try to defend it by using other people's scriptures is, well, rude.

Not our belief, but the Christian belief. Same deal for Krishna being the incarnation of God.

"God" is used for god of abraham. Vishnu is the incarnation of Brahma. Totally different god.
 
Last edited:

CG Didymus

Veteran Member
The heads of the beast, as Abdulbaha explained are the dominions, based on the Areas that the false Islam of Caliphs ruled:


"...the seven heads and seven crowns represent the seven dominions and kingdoms over which they came to rule: the Roman dominion in Syria; the Persian, the Arabian, and the Egyptian dominions; the dominion of Africa—that is, Tunisia, Morocco, and Algeria; the dominion of Andalusia, which is now Spain; and the dominion of the Turkish tribes of Transoxania.."
Abdulbaha, some answered questions.

The wounded head is a reference to one of the dominions. My take is, that is the Arabian dominion. In this Arabian dominion, at the same time the Shia Imams were teaching the true Islam. Their word was like Sword of Truth against the Falsehood that the Umayids and Abbasids were spreading in this region. By their Sword, the Head of the falsehood was wounded till year 260AH, when the last Imam of Shia passed away, and the falsehood of Umayids survived or healed in the Arabian domains after passing of the 11th Imam.​
What are the verses you are using that refer to Shia? But, you know, a Baha'i has said the wounded beast head took power in Andalusia. So you are saying the falsehoods of the Ummayads continued? What were they?
 

CG Didymus

Veteran Member
Abdul 'baha said the flesh body died and was buried. Christ also said the flesh amounts to nothing. So they are in tune with each other.

Abdul'baha said look for the Spiritual Meanings of the Crucifixion, Burial and Resurection as it is matters of the Spirit that are important. Christ siad it is the Spirit that Gives Life.

My previous explanations of looking for spiritual truth in Gods Words, flow on in this reply.

Regards Tony
Yet, again and again and yet again, the whacked out gospel writers misled all the Christians by coming up with the story that the tomb was empty and Jesus had come back to life. So... do you think the early Christians believed the story that Jesus was alive and had appeared to the apostles or that they knew it was only a spiritual/symbolic resurrection and that later Christians got it wrong?
 

Vinayaka

devotee
Premium Member
But then again, words like "evil-doers" and "destruction" have different meanings in Hinduism than it does in Abrahamic view. I mean, The Buddha's suttas use the word sin but the sin, in buddhism, doesn't mean going against god. It just means wrong doing or more, um, there is a better word just can't think of it right now.

For 'sin' , this Hindu would explain it as 'that which leads you away from God.' But since the evolution of the soul is sort of 8 steps ahead, 7 steps back, like that, it is only temporary. There is no eternal damnation for it. All souls evolve.
 

CG Didymus

Veteran Member
Heck, the Hindus can't agree. Here is the more traditional list. Dashavatara - Wikipedia The first guy was a fish. But these days it's an overused word, and is often used as an honorarium to those who are proud of their own particular Guru. So if you think he's really great, you say avatar. I find it just odd. If Abdul Baha would have spoken in India to Hindus, it's quite likely he have adjusted 'manifestation' to 'avatar'.

For most Hindus, all they need is their own version of God. For Saivites, Siva does it all, for Gaudiya Vishnavas, Krishna does it all, for Shaktites, some version of the Goddess does it all. There is a sense of satisfaction, or completeness for everyone. Why add more stuff, it just complicates things unnecessarily? For most of us, we do our dharma, go to temple, raise our kids, go on occasional pilgrimage, enjoy life, and that's about it. It remains quite simple, and we like it that way. Going out and telling everyone all about it would just complicate life.
Well, there you go. We have a list. Now all we need is the Baha'is to add that to their list of Adam and the rest.
 

Unveiled Artist

Veteran Member
For 'sin' , this Hindu would explain it as 'that which leads you away from God.' But since the evolution of the soul is sort of 8 steps ahead, 7 steps back, like that, it is only temporary. There is no eternal damnation for it. All souls evolve.

Hmm. I'd have to find it in the suttas. I think it's more of a translation issue since I haven't seen it in the Pali suttas. In Pali, they use hindrances, ignorance, basic words that say we are stuck in delusions of attachment. I think I may have saw it in Nichiren Buddhism. Some translators have christian influenced commentaries.
 

CG Didymus

Veteran Member
No one manipulated it. Its most likely a minor error where the names become muddled somewhere between whatever happened thousands of years ago concerning Abraham and his family to it first being written down in Genesis. Its hard to unravel history that far back and we will probably never know.
Is the Bible correct? No. Not if they have Issac and not Ishmael. That's not a minor error. And if that's wrong, what else is wrong?
 

CG Didymus

Veteran Member
We are with all our hearts and souls attempting to live the Promise. Are you ready yet :D;)

Regards Tony
Attempting? That's always a problem. Those that believe can always do more. But, if they aren't doing enough, it doesn't impress those that look at them and question their commitment to their own beliefs. Do you have the answer to the world's problems? And like your own religion teaches... let deeds not words be your adorning.
 

Vinayaka

devotee
Premium Member
Hmm. I'd have to find it in the suttas. I think it's more of a translation issue since I haven't seen it in the Pali suttas. In Pali, they use hindrances, ignorance, basic words that say we are stuck in delusions of attachment. I think I may have saw it in Nichiren Buddhism. Some translators have christian influenced commentaries.
For sure you can bet that Buddhism and Hinduism will be similar. Anava is the word we use for ignorance.

Anava - Wikipedia

I see Buddhists and Saivites use the same three words for triple bondage.
 

InvestigateTruth

Well-Known Member
What are the verses you are using that refer to Shia?
One of the Two witnesses is Imam Ali, and 12 stars in Revelation are Shia Imams from Baha'i View. Abdulbaha refers to a 'Spiritual war', between the beast and the true Religion.

But, you know, a Baha'i has said the wounded beast head took power in Andalusia.
Could be true. We do not have an official interpretation.


So you are saying the falsehoods of the Ummayads continued? What were they?
From my view, these verses do not represent the physical war. They represent a spiritual war. Between light of knowledge and darkness of falsehood. The duration of Islam was 1260 years. All these years, the false Islam was being spread by Caliphs which is Not limited to Umayyids. Abbasids also had taken over the Religion of God. But by Manifestation of the Bab, the Religion of God was renewed, thus, even outwardly Caliphs lived longer than 1260 years, but the Religion of God was no longer in their hand. It is like when the Sun rises, the darkness i gone, and the Spiritual war also ended in the realm of Religion of God.
 

Unveiled Artist

Veteran Member
For sure you can bet that Buddhism and Hinduism will be similar. Anava is the word we use for ignorance.

Anava - Wikipedia

I see Buddhists and Saivites use the same three words for triple bondage.

I honestly don't know anything about the language to say yes or no. Actually, this is the first time I heard of Anava. I know the suttas use atman to distinguish The Buddha's differing views on the nature of the soul.
 

Dawnofhope

Non-Proselytizing Baha'i
Staff member
Premium Member
Why do people always use these verses to prove jesus is god?

Because that is what the Christians have been doing for centuries and the Jews centuries before that. The Protestants especially wanted to correct the errors they perceived in the Catholic church so Martin Luther the Protestant reformer emphasised Christians basing their Faith in scripture.

Jesus is called the Word because he is the incarnation of his father's message to the jews and gentiles. The message was the salvation of god/father's people through the life, death, and resurrection of his son. It's also a play on words. Word (divine message; caps) compared to words, like that of scripture.

Jesus answered, “It is written: ‘Man shall not live on bread alone, but on every word that comes from the mouth of God.’” Matthew 4:4

The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the one and only Son, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.
John 1:14
Prepositions are helpful as well as conjunctions help with differentiating the father and the son.

I'm familiar with that argument and comfortable with it. I was simply explaining the basis of Christian's misunderstanding about their own religion. That might sound rude to the Christians, but you are not a Christian, and sometimes we need to call a spade a spade.

Why do people always use these verses to prove jesus is god?

Because they Idolise Jesus and convince themselves He is something He isn't .

Jesus is called the Word because he is the incarnation of his father's message to the jews and gentiles. The message was the salvation of god/father's people through the life, death, and resurrection of his son. It's also a play on words. Word (divine message; caps) compared to words, like that of scripture.

Jesus answered, “It is written: ‘Man shall not live on bread alone, but on every word that comes from the mouth of God.’” Matthew 4:4

The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the one and only Son, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.
John 1:14
Prepositions are helpful as well as conjunctions help with differentiating the father and the son.

You are really on a roll with these quotes. I think I may have triggered something in you.:)

As a result of being the incarnation of his father's message, whatever christ says is what the creator says. It's simple logistics. You have a sender. You have a messenger. You have an audience. What connects the sender to the messenger is a shared divinity; that is what makes the two One (another play on words; aka metaphor).

If my mother told me to tell you to take out the trash, that message is not from me, it is from my mother. Because I am her daughter, I have a relationship with my mother. Given we are connected by blood, we are One.

Somewhere on RF I listed sooo many scriptures on this that no one even rebutted me on any of it. Always happens.

I can see why. It like being hit by a tidal wave of words. Most would give up.:D

Because the father rose him to sit at his right side (not his own right side).

1 Corinthians 6:14 Now God has not only raised the Lord, but will also raise us up through His power.

Ephesians 1:20 which He brought about in Christ, when He raised Him from the dead and seated Him at His right hand in the heavenly places,
I honestly don't make this up. I actually remember these things I studied but don't have the brain energy to remember the verses. I was never a fundy in my Catholic days.

You sure you weren't a Christian fundamentalist in a past life.:p

The christian teaching is the father/creator sent his son/human to be incarnation of his/father's Word/oral dictations of salvation. Once the Word/oral dictations became flesh/christ, then his/creator's message can "walk among the people" and actually interact with them. So, in that interaction, the incarnation/the creator's word, was one with the person who sent the word thereby whoever is saved in christ is forgiven by the father/creator.

As for what individual christians believe. I live among a lot and I mean a lot of christians. They just finished having Korean bible service and singing just a moment ago in the party room, actually. When christians say jesus is god, they are talking about his divinity in perfection.

I'm floored. You've knocked me out!:D

Haha. Just reminding you. :D

As if I needed it, but thank you anyway.:)

Krishna is god. I just don't see how being an incarnation makes god any different. What new message does god bring all because he becomes an incarnation of himself? (going by bahai logic)

My point is, if Christians can be mistaken about the so called Divinity of Christ, then Vaishnavite Hindus can be too.

Sorry. You have to get @Vinayaka to confirm validity of that. In my opinion just by reading it, sounds edit Krishna was an incarnation of Vishnu so that Krishna can bring destruction of the evil-doers.

But then again, words like "evil-doers" and "destruction" have different meanings in Hinduism than it does in Abrahamic view. I mean, The Buddha's suttas use the word sin but the sin, in buddhism, doesn't mean going against god. It just means wrong doing or more, um, there is a better word just can't think of it right now.

I can see he's on the ball. You guys must spent a lot of time on RF!

How can the spirit of christ come down when christ is already here? Is what I asked. Elijah is not here. That's the difference.

But the spirit of Elijah is here too. He was independent of John the Baptist.

Matthew 17:2-5

And was transfigured before them: and his face did shine as the sun, and his raiment was white as the light.
And, behold, there appeared unto them Moses and Elias talking with him.
Then answered Peter, and said unto Jesus, Lord, it is good for us to be here: if thou wilt, let us make here three tabernacles; one for thee, and one for Moses, and one for Elias.
While he yet spake, behold, a bright cloud overshadowed them: and behold a voice out of the cloud, which said, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased; hear ye him.

And where is mount Elijah today?

Bible Gateway passage: 1 Kings 18:16-45 - New International Version

Mount Carmel. And what else sits on Mount Carmel?

Mount Carmel - Wikipedia

TerracesBenGurion2.jpg


His Spirit lives on. :)
 

Unveiled Artist

Veteran Member
I'm familiar with that argument and comfortable with it. I was simply explaining the basis of Christian's misunderstanding about their own religion. That might sound rude to the Christians, but you are not a Christian, and sometimes we need to call a spade a spade.

Haha. As long as it's your opinion, I see nothing wrong with it. People fuss over praying to statues all day long and I find that is the most, or one of the most, ridiculous arguments against Catholicism if I ever heard one.

Because they Idolise Jesus and convince themselves He is something He isn't .

If he is a manifestation of god, wouldn't that be on par to saying bahaullah and so forth come from god too? One of your peers actually quite literally associated Bahaullah as god rather than like or from. I don't see it as convincing, though. If you only see your adopted father and everything you know about your biological father is what your adopted father told you, more than likely you'll trust him so much that you can't tell the difference between the two. It's a natural association between father and son. How christian's express it is besides the point of how they believe or interpret it.

You are really on a roll with these quotes. I think I may have triggered something in you.:)

Haha. Someone stole my laptop so I'm having fun on our "community" computer until it gets so late I have to go home. I can't wait until school starts. I'll be graduating next year; my last semester.

I can see why. It like being hit by a tidal wave of words. Most would give up.:D

lol Well, normally they engage with JW over the same ol' scriptures. When I put in a new thought they never heard of before, and find I'm not christian, they cut the conversation short. Almost as if they can't learn about christ unless it's from christians-especially not from a Catholic. :eek:

You sure you weren't a Christian fundamentalist in a past life.:p

Between fourteen and about seventeen. My brother said I wore their ear out. After surgery (18ish), it died out and I left christianity all together. I was Pentecostal.

I'm floored. You've knocked me out!:D

I think I can talk Christianity in my sleep. It's real refreshing when I can go to a Mosque, Temple, or just walk in the woods without seeing a church or hearing god bless you.

As if I needed it, but thank you anyway.:)

Haha. :herb:

My point is, if Christians can be mistaken about the so called Divinity of Christ, then Vaishnavite Hindus can be too.

:facepalm:

"Can" be. Does not mean they are. Kinda like telling me I'm mistaken about The Buddha because I say he does not believe in god nor point to him.

I would never say anyone is mistaken about their own faith especially a religion I know nothing about. I mean, Buddhism and Hinduism have a lot of linguistics and culture in common but I would never say we believe the same thing just because of similarities. Especially since I practiced Japanese Buddhism and now in a Vietnamese Buddhist sect that neither speaks not a word of Sanskrit and they, like Vinayaka says too, probably barely know anything about their scriptures but their practice and lifestyle based on them.

I can see he's on the ball. You guys must spent a lot of time on RF!

I'm hoping my laptop thief taught me a lesson to take a break from this attachment. Doesn't help they have a computer right down the hall. But at least I have time for other things in my apartment.

But the spirit of Elijah is here too. He was independent of John the Baptist.

And was transfigured before them: and his face did shine as the sun, and his raiment was white as the light.
And, behold, there appeared unto them Moses and Elias talking with him.
Then answered Peter, and said unto Jesus, Lord, it is good for us to be here: if thou wilt, let us make here three tabernacles; one for thee, and one for Moses, and one for Elias.
While he yet spake, behold, a bright cloud overshadowed them: and behold a voice out of the cloud, which said, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased; hear ye him.

Is Elijah here now?

I never heard of Elijah being with christians at any communion at any church, hall, and bible study I've been to throughout the holy-spirit years.

No Elijah in the Eucharist.
 

siti

Well-Known Member
Then they had a British doctor visit Him. After that the doctor said He is a pleasant and healthy young man. Then they executed Him.
And thus began the National Health Service! (Sorry - I couldn't resist)

I am also sorry that I just don't agree with how you seem to think that mental health is so easily definable - I think its actually more complex and fragile than it is possible to incorporate into clinical practice. The reason that religious beliefs are often discounted as 'symptoms' of mental illness in practice is that it would be impossible to draw a definite line between reasonable beliefs and bizarre interpretations. On the other hand, I firmly believe that if someone imagines him/her self to be a manifestation of deity and persists in that belief, there is a very strong possibility that that person is deluded. That was, of course, the conclusion that most people at the time drew about Jesus (if we are to believe the accounts that we have). There is, of course, another possibility - that those we diagnose as having grandiose religious delusions are simply capable of accessing the spiritual realm that is closed off to the rest of us by our 'rational' attachment to the physical world. Even so, how does that help me (for example) - if I am not capable of having a 'spiritual experience' such as those that Jesus, Muhammad or Baha'u'llah claimed to have had, isn't their revelation really for themselves and those who are capable of such experiences?

I have already demonstrated that the practical ideas "revealed" by Baha'u'llah - democracy, equal rights...etc...were by no means new and by no means restricted to faithful believers - atheistic humanists and deists (for example) having already promoted most of these notions well before the mid-19th century. The rest of it is mystical theology and as far as I can tell, there is not much to choose between the various "manifestations" (small 'm') of god(s) in any of the religions.
 
Top