None of the verses where God reply to Job, have any scientific merit.
It just God sprouting nonsensical superstitions of his own "so-called" power. (I'm glad you recognize his existence.)
Job 38: (31-32)
31 Canst thou bind the sweet influences of Pleiades, or loose the bands of Orion? 32 Canst thou bring forth Mazzaroth in his season? or canst thou guide Arcturus with his sons?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arcturus
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pleiades
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orion_%28constellation%29
There is science in it but you just aren’t looking for it.
The actual date to the original composition of Book of Job is unknown, but scholars have pinned it down to anywhere between 7th century and 4th century BCE.
So it is definitely wasn't written when the story was set, in the Bronze Age. The Bronze Age for civilisations and cultures in the Near East, in the periods of 3rd millennium and 2nd millennium BCE...so about 3000 to 1000 BCE.
There are actually zero literary evidences (eg clay or stone tablets, papyrus scrolls, parchment in manuscripts or codices, inscriptions on walls or coffin) that any Israelite wrote anything in ancient Hebrew during the Bronze Age. We don't even have small fragments that date to any of that time, like from Genesis, Exodus, Numbers or Leviticus, dated to the 2nd millennium BCE, the supposed times of Abraham, Jacob, Moses and Joshua.
All literary evidences showed that all the individual books, which Jews called the Tanakh and Christians called Old Testament, all have their roots in the the 1st millennium BCE, Iron Age. Most books were composed between 7th century and 5th century BCE.
The earliest surviving text of anything relating to the Hebrew Torah or Christian Pentateuch, the so-called books said to be written by Moses, is the fragments known as the "silver scrolls", found in the cave of Ketef Hinnom. These badly damaged scrolls have been dated to 6th century BCE, so around the time some notable Jews were exiled in Babylon. The fragments are the only earliest extant texts containing a passage from Numbers 6, known as the Priestly Blessing (6:23-27).
We know that in the Book of Ezekiel mentioned Job, but just because Ezekiel mentioned him doesn't mean much.
According to the Babylonian Talmud, one of the rabbis wrote in the Tractate Baba Bathra 14b, that the Book of Job was written by Moses, himself. But like I said before, we have no literary evidences that any Hebrew text was ever written in the Bronze Age.
As any work in the Talmud or other rabbinical literature, they are based on oral traditions, and lot of it are merely hearsay. The main purpose of Talmud and rabbinical literature, was to preserve the Oral Torah, and to provide exegesis and interpretations of the Torah's narratives and understanding of laws.
But getting back to your points about constellations.
If a large parts of OT bible, were written between 7th and 4th centuries BCE, then knowing the names of some constellations are meaningless, since Homer writing The Odyssey in the 8th century BCE, and Astronomia (dated to 8th or 7th century BCE) said to be written by Hesiod, have already listed the constellations and stars of Orion, the Pleiades, the Great Bear, etc.
Both the Babylonian and Greek astronomers have long known and invented the constellations, so just because it is listed in Job, a text that might be written during 6th century Exile in Babylon, or during 5th to 4th centuries during the construction of a new temple in Jerusalem, doesn't make these allusions to the constellations - "scientific".
The Bronze Age Babylonian astronomers - not the Neo-Babylonians of the Iron Age who were responsible for destroying the temple and exiling Jews - have already known the Pleiades stars as early as 16th century BCE, on what is called the Nebra Sky Disk. The Babylonians called them MUL
MUL, meaning "star star". Other cultures given different names to the Pleiades.
Second, why does Job 38:32 mentioned "Mazzaroth"? You do you realise Mazzaroth is the planet Venus, and not a star, don't you?
Mazzaroth is Jewish name for the morning star and evening star, which is Venus, but whatever you want to call them, they are not stars.
Science is more than just mention or flowery descriptions of any natural phenomena or philosophical insight, it is explanation of WHAT they are, and HOW they work.
None of the passages in Job explain anything. Job doesn't explain what stars are, nor why can see the light from these stars. The author don't even realise that our sun is also star, and yet it confuse the planet Venus as one.
You really need to do better that, jhwatts.