• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Baptising the Dead?

Katzpur

Not your average Mormon
No, we don't baptize dead people.

I know not all Christians believe in original sin, but it seems most if not all denominations perform (if not require) baptisms. What's the point of a baptism if one doesn't believe in original sin? The LDS even perform baptisms for the dead, correct? Why?
I've been asked this question (or a variation of it) two or three times in just the past couple of weeks, so I'd like to address it here for the benefit of any who may be interested. I was going to put it on the Latter-day Saints forum, but eventually decided to put it in a debate forum after all. It’s something I feel strongly about, and feel prepared to debate, if that’s where my comments lead.

Let's start with the fourth Article of Faith of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. It states, "We believe that the first principles and ordinances of the Gospel are: first, faith in the Lord Jesus Christ; second, repentance; third, baptism by immersion for the remission of sins; and fourth, the laying on of hands for the gift of the Holy Ghost." This Article of Faith is important to our discussion.

As some people on RF know, we Latter-day Saints believe that (1) Baptism is a sacred ordinance required of everyone; (2) Baptisms must be performed by immersion by one who has been given the authority to do so, (3) When a person dies, his spirit leaves his physical body but does not cease to exist, (4) millions have died without receiving this ordinance, and (5) God loves all of His children equally and has provided a way for everyone who has ever lived to receive this ordinance prior to the Last Judgment.

Looking at each of these five points in greater detail...

(1) Baptism is a sacred ordinance (some would refer to it as a "sacrament") required of everyone who has ever lived. In the New Testament, Jesus Christ is recorded as having said, "Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God." He actually went so far as to stress that "he that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned." To further emphasize the need for baptism, Jesus Christ went to John the Baptist and asked that he baptize Him. If you will recall, John's response was to ask, "I have need to be baptized of thee, and comest thou to me?" And Jesus' response was, "Suffer it to be so now: for thus it becometh us to fulfil all righteousness." We have clear evidence for the importance of baptism. It is not optional for us; it was not even optional for the one individual who has ever lived who was without sin.

(2) Baptisms must be performed by immersion by one who has been given the authority to do so. The Apostle Paul's words in Ephesians 4:5 that there should be only, "one Lord, one faith, [and] one baptism." When Jesus established His Church, He called and ordained specific individuals, giving them the authority to perform certain functions, including the saving ordinance of baptism. We Latter-day Saints do not believe that anyone who wishes to baptize someone else has the authority to do so. This authority must be passed down from one person who already holds it to someone else. John the Baptist held the proper authority to baptize, which is why Jesus specifically went to him.

(3) When a person dies, his spirit leaves his physical body but does not cease to exist. It goes to the Spirit World where it will reside until the resurrection of all mankind, at which time it will rejoin the physical body it once inhabited, that body having been renewed, restored to a perfect state and made immortal. The Spirit World in spoken of in the scriptures by two names: Paradise and Prison. It is referred to by both terms because it is both things. To the righteous, it is a place of peace and rest, but to the wicked, it is a Prison, a place where they will be tormented with guilt for the way in which they lived their lives. As the spirits of the deceased await the resurrection of their physical bodies, they continue to learn and grow spiritually. They also retain the free will given to them by God when they came to earth to experience mortality. Those who did not have the opportunity to hear or understand the Gospel of Jesus Christ while they were on earth, will have that chance while in the Spirit World. Jesus himself will not be there, as He is now with His Father in Heaven. But others, those who already have the knowledge of our Father's Plan of Salvation, will teach them and give them the opportunity to accept and take advantage of the gospel message. Once a person comes to realize the significance of Jesus Christ's Atonement on his behalf and is sincerely repentant of his sins, he has fulfilled the first two principles of the Gospel (as outlined in the fourth Article of Faith). He is now on his way to being a recipient of the grace offered to all by Jesus Christ.

(4) Millions have died without receiving this ordinance or having received it but not by the prescribed means (immersion) or by someone who had been given the proper authority to perform it. Many lived prior to when Jesus did. Many others have lived since then, but in parts of the world where Christianity was not known. Some live today in places where converting to Christianity is a capital offense. And finally, for reasons known only to God, some have simply not been able to grasp the truth when it was presented to them. They simply chose a different path, one that was probably right for them.

(5) God loves all of His children equally and has provided a way for everyone who has ever lived to receive this ordinance prior to the Last Judgment.It goes without saying that baptism is an earthly ordinance. It would be quite impossible to immerse a spirit in water. Going back to point #1, though, baptism is a required ordinance for entry into the Kingdom of God. Those spirits who accept the Gospel message while in the Spirit World have completed the first two steps towards receiving the Savior's gift of salvation. But without the help of someone on earth, they can go no further.

Hebrews 11:39-40 speaks of those whose faith was strong and who despite not having heard the Gospel of Jesus Christ, were good people who lived essentially worthy lives, “And these all, having obtained a good report through faith, received not the promise: God having provided some better thing for us, that they without us should not be made perfect.”

Just as Jesus Christ atoned for our sins, He has given us, the living, the opportunity of doing something to help those who went before us. As this passage explains, God has blessed us with greater knowledge than they had and has given us the privilege of helping them reach a goal they could not otherwise reach – the fulness of salvation and eternal life in the presence of God. As in ancient times, members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints practice vicarious baptism for our deceased ancestors who died without having received this ordinance. I can, and have, stood in as a proxy for someone who is dead, and have been baptized on their behalf.

In 1 Corinthians 15:29, Paul used the practice of baptism for the dead as an argument to support the reality of the resurrection of us all. In referring to the members of Christ’s Church who were privileged to perform proxy baptisms (for not all are), he asked, “Else what shall they do which are baptized for the dead, if the dead rise not at all? why are they then baptized for the dead?

Many people make the mistake of assuming we believe that we are surreptitiously seeking to force our beliefs on those who have no choice in the matter. Nothing could possibly be further from the truth. We have no way of knowing which of the spirits awaiting the resurrection will be receptive to the message they hear. We are baptized on behalf of as many of them as we can possibly identify. Their free will is every bit as operative in the Spirit World as it was during their mortal lives. Should the choose to accept this ordinance done for them, most likely by one of their descendents, it will be as if they had been baptized while they were here on earth. Should they reject it, it will be considered null and void. We do this work out of a genuine love and concern for those who cannot do it for themselves, and not for any other reason.

At any rate, that’s the doctrine as we practice it. We believed it was revealed to latter-day prophets that this work was to be done, and we are grateful to be able to do it. I’m sure any of the LDS posters on RF will be happy to respond to any additional questions on the subject.
 

uumckk16

Active Member
Thanks for the lengthy explanation, Kathryn! I found it interesting to learn about...

However, I'm a bit confused by your assertion that:

Katzpur said:
No! :eek: We don't baptize dead people!


because isn't that what you're doing? Well, I mean, you're not physically taking a dead body and baptizing it, but you're still in effect baptizing them.

Katzpur said:
In the New Testament, Jesus Christ is recorded as having said, "Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God." He actually went so far as to stress that "he that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned."


But that's not what LDS actually believe, is it? "Damned" refers to Hell...it seems that LDS doctrine states that an unbaptized person merely stays in the Spirit World. Isn't the Spirit World different from Hell? Or is Prison the LDS version of Hell?


Katzpur said:
The Spirit World in spoken of in the scriptures by two names: Paradise and Prison. It is referred to by both terms because it is both things. To the righteous, it is a place of peace and rest, but to the wicked, it is a Prison, a place where they will be tormented with guilt for the way in which they lived their lives.
Does "the righteous" include righteous non-believers, or just LDS? (Sorry if that's completely off, I don't mean to offend.)

Katzpur said:
We are baptized on behalf of as many of them as we can possibly identify.
You recognized the fact that there have been billions of people who have died (or will die) without being baptized (the proper way, or at all). Obviously it is impossible for LDS to stand in for them all (not to trump on the belief, it's just logically impossible). What about those who never heard the gospel, or didn't believe it, who aren't baptized after their deaths? You said:

"God loves all of His children equally and has provided a way for everyone who has ever lived to receive this ordinance prior to the Last Judgment."

How will those who were never baptized - in their lives or afterwards - be accounted for? Again, I'm not trying to step on the LDS belief of baptizing their ancestors...but what about the people that go too far back in time for you to have a record of? Or people that live in isolation, and you simply don't know about? Today there are billions of people who are not Christians, and probably millions of Christians who were not baptized by immersion. The sheer number of people on this planet right now is outstanding...and even more so when you consider all of history.

As always, thanks for helping me with my curiousity :D I hope I don't come off as trying to find holes in your beliefs, because that's certainly not my goal. I just like learning, is all :D
 

SoyLeche

meh...
uumckk16 said:
Thanks for the lengthy explanation, Kathryn! I found it interesting to learn about...

However, I'm a bit confused by your assertion that:



because isn't that what you're doing? Well, I mean, you're not physically taking a dead body and baptizing it, but you're still in effect baptizing them.



But that's not what LDS actually believe, is it? "Damned" refers to Hell...it seems that LDS doctrine states that an unbaptized person merely stays in the Spirit World. Isn't the Spirit World different from Hell? Or is Prison the LDS version of Hell?
"Damned" refers to being stopped in their progression.

Does "the righteous" include righteous non-believers, or just LDS? (Sorry if that's completely off, I don't mean to offend.)
I'm not sure, never been. :)
You recognized the fact that there have been billions of people who have died (or will die) without being baptized (the proper way, or at all). Obviously it is impossible for LDS to stand in for them all (not to trump on the belief, it's just logically impossible). What about those who never heard the gospel, or didn't believe it, who aren't baptized after their deaths? You said:

"God loves all of His children equally and has provided a way for everyone who has ever lived to receive this ordinance prior to the Last Judgment."

How will those who were never baptized - in their lives or afterwards - be accounted for? Again, I'm not trying to step on the LDS belief of baptizing their ancestors...but what about the people that go too far back in time for you to have a record of? Or people that live in isolation, and you simply don't know about? Today there are billions of people who are not Christians, and probably millions of Christians who were not baptized by immersion. The sheer number of people on this planet right now is outstanding...and even more so when you consider all of history.

As always, thanks for helping me with my curiousity :D I hope I don't come off as trying to find holes in your beliefs, because that's certainly not my goal. I just like learning, is all :D
We believe that there will be a thousand year period following the return of Christ in which most of this work will take place. Now we're just getting a head start. A thousand years should be enough time to get it done. Everyone will get a chance.
 

Arrow

Member
I thought you were going to say that people actually baptize dead people...and i was so excited to. :( I did think that this was interesting though.
 

Quiddity

UndertheInfluenceofGiants
Can someone explain to me how Baptism for the dead is different then infant baptism in the sense that there is no consent?

It would seem worse in my opinion to baptize the dead because the infant atleast has an opportunity to reject in this life what he was taught in this life.
 

Polaris

Active Member
Victor said:
Can someone explain to me how Baptism for the dead is different then infant baptism in the sense that there is no consent?


Why baptism for the dead:
- the dead are capable of choosing whether or not to accept the baptism
- they will never have the chance to be baptised for themselves
- the dead still have need of repentance
- there is scriptural support for it

Why not infant baptism:
- infants aren't capable of making that choice
- they will be given the opportunity to be baptised for themselves when they are of age and capable of choosing to do so. Just give them a few years and they'll a) have need for baptism, and b) be able to choose which baptism they want (if any).
- infants are not capable of committing sin and therefore have no need of repentance. Remember baptism is for remission of sins.
- there is no scriptural support for infant baptism

Victor said:
It would seem worse in my opinion to baptize the dead because the infant atleast has an opportunity to reject in this life what he was taught in this life.
The dead are perfectly free to reject the baptism performed in their behalf.
 

Bishka

Veteran Member
Victor said:
It would seem worse in my opinion to baptize the dead because the infant atleast has an opportunity to reject in this life what he was taught in this life.
And the dead have an opporutunity to reject it in the next life.
 

Quiddity

UndertheInfluenceofGiants
Well, that get's into a whole other can of worms as to why I would even take this life serious if another clearer chance is coming. ;)

That and why baptize someone that you do not know for sure they would consent to it?
 

Bishka

Veteran Member
Victor said:
Well, that get's into a whole other can of worms as to why I would even take this life serious if another clearer chance is coming. ;)

That's the paradox isn't it,. :)
 

Polaris

Active Member
Victor said:
Well, that get's into a whole other can of worms as to why I would even take this life serious if another clearer chance is coming. ;)

That's a dangerous approach to take. God knows the intents of our hearts and will judge us accordingly. If we made a sincere effort to do our best to seek and do His will, He'll know it. If we didn't, expecting to get some free pass later on, He'll know that too.
 

Quiddity

UndertheInfluenceofGiants
Polaris said:
That's a dangerous approach to take. God knows the intents of our hearts and will judge us accordingly. If we made a sincere effort to do our best to seek and do His will, He'll know it. If we didn't, expecting to get some free pass later on, He'll know that too.

Then why wouldn't he know it in this life? ;)
 

evearael

Well-Known Member
Why baptism for the dead:
- the dead are capable of choosing whether or not to accept the baptism
- they will never have the chance to be baptised for themselves
- the dead still have need of repentance
- there is scriptural support for it

Why not infant baptism:
- infants aren't capable of making that choice
- they will be given the opportunity to be baptised for themselves when they are of age and capable of choosing to do so. Just give them a few years and they'll a) have need for baptism, and b) be able to choose which baptism they want (if any).
- infants are not capable of committing sin and therefore have no need of repentance. Remember baptism is for remission of sins.
- there is no scriptural support for infant baptism
So... if, God forbid, an infant dies, would you perform a baptism after death?
 

Bishka

Veteran Member
evearael said:
So... if, God forbid, an infant dies, would you perform a baptism after death?
Us?

No, because we believe that babies don't need baptism. At age 8 is when baptisms start, basically we believe that ANY child before the age of 8 automatically goes into Heaven, because they are capable of comiitting sin, but not held accountable because of their age and accountability.
 

Quiddity

UndertheInfluenceofGiants
beckysoup61 said:
Us?

No, because we believe that babies don't need baptism. At age 8 is when baptisms start, basically we believe that ANY child before the age of 8 automatically goes into Heaven, because they are capable of comiitting sin, but not held accountable because of their age and accountability.

Then let everyone die before the age of eight.....:149:
 

SoyLeche

meh...
Victor said:
Then let everyone die before the age of eight.....:149:
But then who would perform the baptisms for all those who have already lived beyond 8 and have died without baptism. It seems there is a flaw in your plan ;)
 

Polaris

Active Member
Victor said:
Then why wouldn't he know it in this life? ;)

It goes back to John 3:5 "Except a man be born of water and of the spirit he cannot enter into the kingdom of God".

While God considers our intentions, he also holds us to His commandments.
 

Katzpur

Not your average Mormon
uumckk16 said:
Well, I mean, you're not physically taking a dead body and baptizing it, but you're still in effect baptizing them.
Well, my opening sentence was actually intended to be kind of flippant. We're kind of used to hearing responses like Arrow's. People hear the phrase, "baptisms for the dead," and think, "baptisms of the dead." I think they imagine us dunking dead bodies. :eek: But yes, a proxy baptism fills the requirement in exactly the same way as if the person had been baptized himself during his lifetime. That's the beauty of it.



But that's not what LDS actually believe, is it? "Damned" refers to Hell...it seems that LDS doctrine states that an unbaptized person merely stays in the Spirit World. Isn't the Spirit World different from Hell? Or is Prison the LDS version of Hell?
No one will stay the Spirit Prison beyond the Final Judgment. The vast majority of people will ultimately end up in Heaven (though not all will be be given the same reward or "degree of glory" in Heaven). A very few individuals will ultimately spend eternity in Outer Darkness, in a state utterly devoid of God's glory. This is the state most Christians would describe as "Hell." The Prison of the Spirit World, while it is a "hell" of sorts, need only be temporary; anyone who is there may be released upon having in Christ and repentence for one's sins, and even the majority of the unrepentant will actually inherit one of the lower realms of glory in Heaven.



Does "the righteous" include righteous non-believers, or just LDS? (Sorry if that's completely off, I don't mean to offend.)
I'm not 100% positive, but I personally feel that "the righteous" would include righteous non-believers. Christ told the repentant thief who hung next to Him on the cross that He would see him that day in Paradise. That alone would lead me to believe that one would not need to be LDS in order to find himself in Paradise after death. Two individuals I personally believe went to Paradise, as opposed to the Spirit Prison, after their deaths were Pope John Paul II and Mother Teresa. To me, they both represented the epitome of righteousness.


You recognized the fact that there have been billions of people who have died (or will die) without being baptized (the proper way, or at all). Obviously it is impossible for LDS to stand in for them all (not to trump on the belief, it's just logically impossible). What about those who never heard the gospel, or didn't believe it, who aren't baptized after their deaths? You said:

"God loves all of His children equally and has provided a way for everyone who has ever lived to receive this ordinance prior to the Last Judgment."

How will those who were never baptized - in their lives or afterwards - be accounted for? Again, I'm not trying to step on the LDS belief of baptizing their ancestors...but what about the people that go too far back in time for you to have a record of? Or people that live in isolation, and you simply don't know about? Today there are billions of people who are not Christians, and probably millions of Christians who were not baptized by immersion. The sheer number of people on this planet right now is outstanding...and even more so when you consider all of history.
I know. It's a daunting process, but as SoyLeche pointed out, the work will continue throughout the millenium. As to how it will ever be accomplished, I don't know. But I do know that with God, nothing is impossible, and I also know that God would not give His children a commandment without providing a way for them to obey it.

As always, thanks for helping me with my curiousity :D I hope I don't come off as trying to find holes in your beliefs, because that's certainly not my goal. I just like learning, is all :D
No problem. I certainly don't object to questions, and enjoy the opportunity to fill up the "holes" with accurate information. It beats filling them up with garbage any day.
 

Katzpur

Not your average Mormon
Victor said:
Can someone explain to me how Baptism for the dead is different then infant baptism in the sense that there is no consent?

It would seem worse in my opinion to baptize the dead because the infant atleast has an opportunity to reject in this life what he was taught in this life.
In some ways there is not a great deal of difference, Victor. As you have pointed out, someone who was baptized as an infant has the opportunity to reject that baptism later in life. Someone who received baptism by proxy after their death will also have that opportunity. From this standpoint, the "consent" issue is pretty much the same.

I see the significant difference being that we don't believe infants to have sinned at all. Since baptism is an ordinance done for the remission of sins, there is no need, according to LDS belief, to baptize someone at all -- until he has reached an age where he is able to understand the difference between right and wrong. At that point, baptism becomes essential to salvation.
 

uumckk16

Active Member
SoyLeche said:
"Damned" refers to being stopped in their progression.
Not according to my dictionary, but okay.

Polaris said:
The dead are perfectly free to reject the baptism performed in their behalf.
Katzpur said:
As you have pointed out, someone who was baptized as an infant has the opportunity to reject that baptism later in life. Someone who received baptism by proxy after their death will also have that opportunity. From this standpoint, the "consent" issue is pretty much the same.

This is a completely obvious point, but: you're assuming you're right. I mean, of course you assume that. Everyone believes that what they believe is correct, otherwise they wouldn't believe it. But what if you're not? I think Victor makes a good point. We know babies will have a chance to reject their baptisms in this life if they so choose. We don't know what happens after our death - we can't possibly know. We believe things about what happens. For a moment let's assume that the LDS perspective is incorrect. I know there are some people who would be strongly opposed to being baptized after their deaths. In that case it is against their consent. Now, I can see why you feel this point to be completely, well, pointless, but if you look at it from an outsider's perspective, the infants actually have more of a choice as they can reject their baptism later in life if need be.

Katzpur said:
Well, my opening sentence was actually intended to be kind of flippant.


Ah, I understand now. :)

Katzpur said:
I'm not 100% positive, but I personally feel that "the righteous" would include righteous non-believers. Christ told the repentant thief who hung next to Him on the cross that He would see him that day in Paradise. That alone would lead me to believe that one would not need to be LDS in order to find himself in Paradise after death. Two individuals I personally believe went to Paradise, as opposed to the Spirit Prison, after their deaths were Pope John Paul II and Mother Teresa. To me, they both represented the epitome of righteousness.


Pope John Paul II and Mother Teresa? They are considered non-believers, even though both were Christian? They were certainly both closer to being "believers" in the LDS sense than, say, Gandhi or Buddha. Do you think those individuals would be in Prison?

Katzpur said:
I know. It's a daunting process, but as SoyLeche pointed out, the work will continue throughout the millenium. As to how it will ever be accomplished, I don't know. But I do know that with God, nothing is impossible, and I also know that God would not give His children a commandment without providing a way for them to obey it.


I understand your faith that God will provide a way. But I still am not sure how you can possibly hope to baptize every non-LDS person who has ever lived. There are so many people even today who have no record of their existence. When natural disasters occur only an estimate of deaths can be provided. And that's today...in the past there were even less records. I suppose this is a rather fruitless point to make as you've made it clear that God will provide a way, but I just wanted to clarify a bit more what I meant.

:)
 
Top