• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

How I Changed my Mind About Mary

Quiddity

UndertheInfluenceofGiants
By: Mark Shea

It once seemed perfectly obvious to me that Catholics honored Mary too much. All those feasts, rosaries, icons, statues and whatnot were ridiculously excessive. Yes, the gospel of Luke said something about her being "blessed" and yes I thought her a good person. But that was that. People who celebrated her or called her "Mother" or did all the million things which Catholic piety encourages bordered on idolatry. It was all too much. Jesus, after all, is our Savior, not Mary.

However, after looking at the gospel of Luke afresh and thinking more and more about the humanity of Jesus Christ, some things dawned on me. For it turns out that Luke said more than "something" about Mary. He reports that God was conceived in her womb and thereby made a son of Adam! This means more than merely saying that Mary was an incubator unit for the Incarnation. It means that the Logos, the Second Person of the Trinity derives his humanity--all of it--from her! Why does this matter? Because the entire reason we are able to call Jesus "savior" at all is because the God who cannot die became a man who could die. And he chose to do it through Mary's free "yes" to him. No Mary, no human nature for Christ. No human nature for Christ, no death on the cross. No death, no resurrection. No resurrection, no salvation. Without Mary, we are still in our sins.

This made me see Mary very differently. The Incarnation is vastly more than God zipping on a disposable man-suit. He remains man eternally. Therefore, his joining with the human race through the womb of Mary means (since he is the savior of us all), that she is the mother of us all (John 19:27). Moreover, it means that her remarkable choice to say "Yes" to the Incarnation was not merely a one-time incident, it was an offering of her own heart to God and us. Her heart was pierced by the sword that opened the fountain of blood and water in Christ's human heart, for it was she who, by the grace of God, gave him that heart (Luke 2:35; John 19:34).
Seeing this, I began to wonder again: If Catholics honor Mary "too much", where did we Evangelicals honor her "just enough." Mary herself said "henceforth, all generations will call me blessed." When was the last time I had heard a contemporary Christian tune on the radio sung in honor of Mary? Or a prayer in church to extol her? How about a teensy weensy bit of verse or a little article in some magazine singling out Mary as blessed among women? Aside from "Silent Night" was there anything in Evangelical piety which dared to praise her for even a moment? I was an Evangelical for seven years and I never saw so much as a dram of it.

So the question became for me, "How could we talk about something being 'excessive' when we had virtually no experience of it ourselves?" What if it was we Evangelicals who were excessive in our horror of Marian piety and Catholics who are normal? Judging from the witness of the early Fathers and even of Martin Luther (who had a very robust Marian devotion and whose tomb is decorated with an illustration of the Assumption of the Virgin into Heaven) it seemed to me that it was we Evangelicals who were excessive in our fear of her rather than Catholics who were excessive in their devotion.

"Hail Mary, full of grace. The Lord is with thee. Blessed art thou among women and blessed is the fruit of thy womb, Jesus. Holy Mary, Mother of God, pray for us sinners, now and at the hour of our death. Amen."
There. That didn't hurt a bit. In fact, I think I heard St. Luke pray it too!
 

MysticSang'ha

Big Squishy Hugger
Premium Member
Since I was raised Catholic, Victor, I think your post hit the nail on the head as to why I hold a certain respect for the Church for it's praises of Mary as the Mother of God.




My mother told me of how she often would be visited by her at night when her family was going through hard times around WWII. She's told me that she is more beautiful and loving than she could ever imagine. I've always loved her stories of when Mary would visit her.



When I saw The Passion of the Christ at the theatre, it was Mary who grabbed my attention nearly as much as Jesus did. Talk about strength, dignity, and seeing her as "the mother of us all!"




Oh, and reciting the Hail Mary prayer takes me back to all those times I'd be kneeling in the pews after confession with my rosary. :)






Peace,
Mystic
 

Scott1

Well-Known Member
Great thread Victor! Gotta love Mark Shea....

Keep up the good work with this forum... it was nice to see that, as always, the Roman Catholic Forum is the most active of all the Individual Religions sub-Forums.

Good Bless,
Scott
 

Katzpur

Not your average Mormon
MysticSang'ha said:
When I saw The Passion of the Christ at the theatre, it was Mary who grabbed my attention nearly as much as Jesus did. Talk about strength, dignity, and seeing her as "the mother of us all!"
I'd forgotten, but now that you mention it, that was my impression, too. I really did love how Mary was always there for her son. The way she was depicted in the movie was just a powerful reminder of how great a woman she was.
 

joeboonda

Well-Known Member
I understand reverence for Mary, she was obedient to God and bore His Son, then in LUke 2:21-24, she offered her sin offering of two turtledoves to the temple as all good mothers did (Jewish). But the Bible says all have sinned, that there is none righeous, (this would include Mary as it says only Jesus never sinned). It was only Jesuswho never sinned, that is why Jesus could pay for our sins, not Mary. So, when people bow down and pray to statues of her, instead of worshipping and praying to Jesus, that does cause me some concern. Mary was the chosen vessel to bring Christ into the world, but Christ created the world, He is divine, Mary only human. She is referred to as a mediatrix, but again, my Bible says that there is only one mediator between God and man, the Lord Jesus Christ, in 1 Tim. 2:5, so there are not two mediators, just one, and that is Jesus through whom we pray and the one who we go to as a mediator for our sins. So, if Jesus intercedes for us and not Mary, if Jesus answers our prayers, and not Mary, if Jesus paid for our sins, and not Mary, if she is presented some other way than only the Bible presents her, I have to wonder. I have my own ideas, which I will keep to myself. I just think we need to point people to Jesus, so they can be saved, more than raising up Mary, we should raise up Christ.
 

Quiddity

UndertheInfluenceofGiants
joeboonda said:
I understand reverence for Mary, she was obedient to God and bore His Son, then in LUke 2:21-24, she offered her sin offering of two turtledoves to the temple as all good mothers did (Jewish). But the Bible says all have sinned, that there is none righeous, (this would include Mary as it says only Jesus never sinned). It was only Jesuswho never sinned, that is why Jesus could pay for our sins, not Mary.
Then it is obvious to me that you do not take that verse hyper-literally. If you did, you would have to include Jesus himself.
joeboonda said:
So, when people bow down and pray to statues of her, instead of worshipping and praying to Jesus, that does cause me some concern.
It would me too if they were indeed "worshipping" Mary. In fact, I'm sure Mary herself wouldn't like it. Is this really what you think Catholics teach?
joeboonda said:
Mary was the chosen vessel to bring Christ into the world, but Christ created the world, He is divine, Mary only human. She is referred to as a mediatrix, but again, my Bible says that there is only one mediator between God and man, the Lord Jesus Christ, in 1 Tim. 2:5, so there are not two mediators, just one, and that is Jesus through whom we pray and the one who we go to as a mediator for our sins.
Jesus alone effectively interposes between God the Father and the entire human race. It is crucial to note that this intercession/mediation is regarding our redemption.

But there is a secondary meaning to the word "mediator".

CATHOLIC ANSWERS
There is, however, a less strict sense in which Christians from the earliest times have understood the idea of mediation. This is the idea of a subordinate mediation by which we participate in the mediation of Jesus Christ. It is a mediation that is effective through, with, and in Christ. The subordinate mediator never stands alone, but is always dependent on Jesus. Let’s examine the biblical foundation for this understanding, with a special reference to 1 Timothy 2:5.

<snip>

In attempting to interpret a particular Bible passage correctly, it is imperative to begin by considering the passage in its context. Paul’s first letter to Timothy 2:5 shows how these principles apply. If we consider this verse—"For there is one God, and there is one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus"—apart from its context, it is easy to misinterpret. Doesn’t "one mediator" mean just that—one, no exception? If this is so, asking for the intercession of saints seems anti-biblical.

However, this interpretation is inaccurate. The passage is not isolated. It is a verse in a larger book called an epistle. What, then, is the correct meaning of Paul’s teaching? How does this passage fit in with the whole picture presented in the Bible?

Let’s consider these questions by first examining the immediate context of 1 Timothy 2:5. Is Paul rejecting the idea of mediators subordinate to Jesus? Actually, the opposite is true. Chapter two of 1 Timothy opens with the following exhortation: "First of all, then, I urge that supplications, prayers, intercessions, and thanksgivings be made for all men, for kings and all who are in high positions, that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life, godly and respectful in every way" (1 Tim. 2:1–2).

Supplications, prayers, and intercessions are acts of mediation. Paul is instructing Timothy that Christians are to assume the role of a subordinate mediator between God and those listed (namely, "all men, for kings and all who are in high positions"). The theological principle that Paul uses to buttress his command is the passage already quoted in verse five—the one, primary mediation of Jesus.

Continued------->http://www.catholic.com/thisrock/2000/0005fea1.asp

Hope that helps...:)
 

Arrow

Member
? What makes Mary so great? I do not mean any disrespect, but the only thing that made her significant was that she was from the line of David. However, God could have used any female from the line of David and still fulfill prophecy and covenant. Mary was blessed because she was the one lucky enough to give birth to Jesus. She was blessed in that she was the first human to know Jesus. I see no reason why she should be put in a higher place than any of the apostles or fellow Christians. After all, she was human like the rest of us. If this could be cleared up that would be great.
 

Happier

Member
Arrow said:
I just realized i kind of seemed harsh and i apologize.

Actually Arrow you just said what a lot of us were thinking.

Victor, what do you think of the petition signed by so many RC's (including Mother Teresa) to name Mary co-Redemptrix? I think it is heresy.

Do you not think the Marian assumption would be hard to swallow - if not downright offensive - for most Protestants based on our core beliefs - scripture alone, faith alone, grace alone, and Christ alone?

The belief that Mary was sinless from birth - where does that come from? Or that she herself was the result of a virgin birth? What is the source of these claims, and why should they be believed?

My parents were both Godly believers, now saints in heaven. Would it be appropriate for me to pray for their intercession? I'm honestly not trying to be facetious here, but digging for that kernel of truth.

If Christ indeed is our only bridge from humanity to God, our only source of salvation, I wish Catholics would just say so. Otherwise salvation becomes very nebulous and confusing.

Because if not - why the agony of the crucifixion? What was the point? IOW, if we could just be baptized, go to confession, go to Mass, partake of the sacraments, try our best to be good Catholics, and do penance, then why would a just God demand the death of His Son?
 

Quiddity

UndertheInfluenceofGiants
Happier,

Not surprising really. That's about what I would expect from Christians that perhaps aren't open to Holy Tradition and may be Sola Scripturist. Marian doctrines are difficult to extract from the Bible Alone.

There are some implicit verses that indicate what we believe about Mary. But nothing that has had any consistant success. Most verses I would give you would more then likely be interpreted differently by you. Doesn't leave much room for you and I to discuss the issue really. At least not until we get the topic of "Holy Tradition" and other topics out of the way first.

Peace be with you,
~Victor
 

Halcyon

Lord of the Badgers
Arrow said:
? What makes Mary so great? I do not mean any disrespect, but the only thing that made her significant was that she was from the line of David. However, God could have used any female from the line of David and still fulfill prophecy and covenant. Mary was blessed because she was the one lucky enough to give birth to Jesus. She was blessed in that she was the first human to know Jesus. I see no reason why she should be put in a higher place than any of the apostles or fellow Christians. After all, she was human like the rest of us. If this could be cleared up that would be great.
Sorry, a little off topic, but just a small question.

Is she of the lineage of David, Joseph was but i don't remember anything about Mary being of the House of David?
Elizabeth was of the lineage of Aaron, so wouldn't Mary also be of Aaron?
 

Quiddity

UndertheInfluenceofGiants
Halcyon said:
Sorry, a little off topic, but just a small question.

Is she of the lineage of David, Joseph was but i don't remember anything about Mary being of the House of David?
Elizabeth was of the lineage of Aaron, so wouldn't Mary also be of Aaron?

It is traditionally believed that Mary was in the line of David.

Beyond that, if my memory serves me correctly Kashrut law allows adopted sons full inheritance rights.


The Protoevangelium of James written around the same time as the Gospels does mention she was of the lineage of David.


 

Halcyon

Lord of the Badgers
Victor said:
It is traditionally believed that Mary was in the line of David.

Beyond that, if my memory serves me correctly Kashrut law allows adopted sons full inheritance rights.


The Protoevangelium of James written around the same time as the Gospels does mention she was of the lineage of David.


Thanks Victor :)
 

lilithu

The Devil's Advocate
Arrow said:
? What makes Mary so great? I do not mean any disrespect, but the only thing that made her significant was that she was from the line of David. However, God could have used any female from the line of David and still fulfill prophecy and covenant. Mary was blessed because she was the one lucky enough to give birth to Jesus. She was blessed in that she was the first human to know Jesus. I see no reason why she should be put in a higher place than any of the apostles or fellow Christians. After all, she was human like the rest of us. If this could be cleared up that would be great.
Well, according to the OP it's not her lineage that makes her great. As you said, there were other women that God could have chosen who would have satisfied the "lineage" criterion. The fact that you wrote "used" rather than "chose" shows the difference between you and the writer in the OP. To you, Mary is just a womb to be used and tossed aside.

"Behold, I am the handmaid of the Lord. May it be done to me according to your word."

What made Mary great is that she said "yes." You say that she was "blessed" and that "she was the one lucky enough to give birth to Jesus." It seems from your perspective that anyone would have said yes if given the chance. All the glory and none of the burden, huh?

Mary said "yes" to conceiving a child before she was married, and the possible rammifications as a result of that. She said "yes" to the responsibility of raising a child who was God. She said "yes" to the pain of watching her son be tortured and executed. If you don't take the reality of these burdens seriously then you don't take the reality of Jesus' humanity and his own suffering seriously.
 

love

tri-polar optimist
Arrow said:
? What makes Mary so great? I do not mean any disrespect, but the only thing that made her significant was that she was from the line of David. However, God could have used any female from the line of David and still fulfill prophecy and covenant. Mary was blessed because she was the one lucky enough to give birth to Jesus. She was blessed in that she was the first human to know Jesus. I see no reason why she should be put in a higher place than any of the apostles or fellow Christians. After all, she was human like the rest of us. If this could be cleared up that would be great.
Can you imagine being awaken by an angel and told that you have been blessed of all women and you shall bear a child Who is of God and not the seed of man.
 

athanasius

Well-Known Member
Great post Victor. I love our Mother. I wrote a 9 page paper for college on the Marian dogmas and praying to Mary from scripture and tradition. I wish I could find it. I wrote it 2 years ago. I got a A. Mary is sooo biblical and traditional. Whenever I am ask if I ever accepted Jesus as my Personal Lord and Savior, I respond Yes I have! I love the Lord Jesus Christ. Then I ask them "Have you accepted Mary as your personal Mother". We should, because she is the Mother to all who name the name Christian(Rev 12:17 JN 19:26).

A few great books for protestants to read about how biblical marian devotiona dn dogmas are:

1) "Hail Holy Queen; the Mother of God in the word of God" by Scripture Scholar Dr Scott Hahn(A convert from protestantism)

2) "Catholic for a reason 2; Scripture and mystery of the Mother of God"(Loaded with scripture)

3) "Refuting The Attack On Mary; A Defense of the Marian Dogmas" by father Mateo

Dr Scott Hahn is excellent, I also would suggest Tim Staples tapes and CD set called "All generations shall call be blessed". They go into 8 hours of scripture dealing with the marian dogmas. Staples was a baptist and pentecostal youth minister before he came into the fullness of truth in the Catholic church. He is on fire for love of our Lord and our Lady.

Have a great day.

In the Sacred Heart of Jesus through the Immaculate Heart of Mary,
Athanasius
 
Top