• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Where's the line of distinction?

RedDragon94

Love everyone, meditate often
Some do, some don't. Some theistic Satanists start out as LaVeyan and then find that they are actually theistic (Setianism is actually sometimes considered a form of Satanism because the founder used to identify as a LaVeyan Satanist, and then identified as theistic and summoned Set, who is in his veiw the true Satan). Other theistic Satanists read the book just to become more aware of LaVey's philosophy since it affected all sects of present-day Satanism. Yet others have "felt" Satan on their own and shun the Satanic Bible for not being "real Satanism" (or at least not of value to their beliefs). And others still use the Biblical Satan as their god and are labeled "reverse Christians". I've read about and met online all of these types of Satanists and half of them don't even pay attention to LaVey.
Mmmm. I bet it makes it hard to know who you're dealing with.
 
LaVeyan Satanism is a philosophy, not an actual religion. In my opinion its simply another form of atheism. But please keep in mind Satanism in general is extremely diverse, Theistic Satanism is an umbrella term and theres tons of different sects and organizations that fall under Theistic Satanism, then there are just Independent Satanists whom are the equivalent of Non-Denominational Christians. Its all a hot mess...

Basically, Satanism is just as diverse as Christianity. <3
 

soulsurvivor

Active Member
Premium Member
It seems to me that when I read the Satanic Bible by Anton LaVey and I listen to Atheists on say, Youtube, there's very little difference between the philosophies.

Heck, here's this:

And this:

How many atheists believe that it is unhealthy to not feel hate towards other people?
Very few. None of the ones I know.
How many atheists believe that the weak are made to suffer and that the earth belongs to the strong/intelligent?
Very few.
How many atheists believe that all deities are man made? (Probably all of them.)
All of them
How many atheists believe that they are the ones that are to give their lives meaning apart from any help from others?
Many of them. Many also believe in helping each other and find meaning in that
What's the difference?
A lot. Many humanists are atheists, but no humanist is a satanist.
 

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
Okay, I'll ask you this. What do you personally think about LaVeyan Satanism?

And, is LaVeyan Satanism an accurate philosophy?

If I thought LaVeyan Satanism was an 'accurate' philosophy, I'd be LaVeyan. I'm not. No matter how much two separate threads this week want to suggest otherwise.
 

A Vestigial Mote

Well-Known Member
How many atheists believe that it is unhealthy to not feel hate towards other people?
Why would that ever be considered "unhealthy?" It's a strange notion - I've never even heard this, or considered it, and I certainly don't believe it in the least.

How many atheists believe that the weak are made to suffer and that the earth belongs to the strong/intelligent?
This is far too general a description, and is, to my mind, a very simplistic and naive take on the world. How many times have the (at the time) "weak" overthrown those who thought themselves "stronger/more-intelligent" via revolution? It is also my sincere belief that it makes no sense to point to "strength" or "intelligence" and state that those are, definitively the "best" qualities to have. For example, a "patient" person could probably wait until the strong killed the intelligent, or vice versa, and then make their move to kill the remaining person while they are tired or unaware. Is "patience" then, "the best" thing to be? Not necessarily even that, obviously. In the end, a person who is "weak" still retains prowess in something. It is foolish to underestimate almost anything.

How many atheists believe that all deities are man made? (Probably all of them.)
Well, without holding a belief in god(s), the ideas for them had to come from somewhere... so yeah, I subscribe to this notion.

How many atheists believe that they are the ones that are to give their lives meaning apart from any help from others?
Also too general. I derive much of the meaning I ascribed my life from my children. In a sense, I needed (and still need) their "help" to achieve that sense of meaning.

What's the difference?
There can be plenty of differences, apparently.
 

idav

Being
Premium Member
Okay, I'll ask you this. What do you personally think about LaVeyan Satanism?

And, is LaVeyan Satanism an accurate philosophy?
LaVeyan Satanism, it isn't about accuracy, it's opinion on how we ought to act knowing the facts that we are just animals. I think we ought to act better than animals because we know better.
 

whirlingmerc

Well-Known Member
Christianity is 'Thy will be done'
Magic/witchcraft/satanism is 'My will be done'

very different

'all of us like sheep have gone astray each of us has turned to his own way but the Lord has laid the iniquity of us all on Him' Isaiah 53:6
 
Last edited:

RedDragon94

Love everyone, meditate often
If I thought LaVeyan Satanism was an 'accurate' philosophy, I'd be LaVeyan. I'm not. No matter how much two separate threads this week want to suggest otherwise.
Fine, you're not a Satanist. :)

It just seems to be that a lot of Atheists are proponents of Satanism. Which if they are it's fine, I just want people to be honest if they ever do find themselves on the LHP.

Change of topic, does every atheist have a personal philosophy?
 

sayak83

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Fine, you're not a Satanist. :)

It just seems to be that a lot of Atheists are proponents of Satanism. Which if they are it's fine, I just want people to be honest if they ever do find themselves on the LHP.

Change of topic, does every atheist have a personal philosophy?
It appears from the responses here that your impression was wrong.

A large fraction (maybe a majority) of atheists I have met subscribe to secular humanism of some sort.
The Amsterdam Declaration | IHEU

A significant minority is primarily anti-theist and a smaller group is libertarian.
 

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
Fine, you're not a Satanist. :)

It just seems to be that a lot of Atheists are proponents of Satanism. Which if they are it's fine, I just want people to be honest if they ever do find themselves on the LHP.

Don't take this the wrong way, as I don't mean it negatively, but I do wonder about Americans sometimes. In most of the first world, atheists are a dime a dozen, and people realise they include all types.

Yes, some are satanists. But percentage wise, it's a tiny amount.
I, for one, dislike being characterized as a communist (since I'm certainly not).
Until recently, Satanism wasn't even a blip to be considered, so I'm a little confused why it suddenly is. Neither Satanists nor atheists (or atheist Satanists) are likely to confuse the two.

Change of topic, does every atheist have a personal philosophy?

Yep.
In fact, every person on Earth does. Some are more informed by dogma or borrowed philosophies than others, so are more naieve than others, etc.
Ultimately we all have personal philosophies we live by. Or try to live by.
 

A Vestigial Mote

Well-Known Member
Change of topic, does every atheist have a personal philosophy?
I would venture to say that every individual human being has a "personal philosophy", and that no one's lines up 100% with any "doctrine" they have chosen to adhere to. Consider The Bible - what does it even mean to adhere "100%" to Christianity's doctrine? Ask a thousand people, get a thousand unique answers.

Which is why I, personally, eschew most all labels, and follow absolutely no doctrine. To my mind it is a silly notion - I'll never accept 100% of any complex doctrine, guaranteed, so why bother? I believe in and feel what I believe in and feel - and I don't need others around me of supposed "like mind" to validate my beliefs. Someone doesn't like that I can't squeeze myself into a box so that their mind can be at ease understanding "what I am?" Fine, just don't talk to me - then they can hold onto their simplified view of the world and keep up their personal illusions about having it all figured out (e.g. "Atheists are Satanists, amiright?") - you know, the things that keep their mind safe from the horrifying terrors of "reality" (*GASP!!!*)
 

Corvus

Feathered eyeball connoisseur
It seems to me that when I read the Satanic Bible by Anton LaVey and I listen to Atheists on say, Youtube, there's very little difference between the philosophies.

Your problem.

How many atheists believe that it is unhealthy to not feel hate towards other people?

It is not healthy, it is usually a sign there is something wrong with you.

How many atheists believe that the weak are made to suffer and that the earth belongs to the strong/intelligent?

Not me, that is simply a somewhat naziesque belief in some sort of pseudoscientific intepretation of Darwnian theory incorrectly applied to an advanced mutually dependent civilization.

How many atheists believe that all deities are man made? (Probably all of them.)

Duh...all of them are man made. By logical extension of the atheist claim. They must be man made if they do not exist.

How many atheists believe that they are the ones that are to give their lives meaning apart from any help from others?

You don' t mean anything, you gene dispersal unit. You are just lucky to be alive. Don't waste the opportunity on invisible Gods and demented holy books.

What's the difference?

Satan can go away and reproduce. That is the basic difference. We atheists do not believe in the existence of Gods or supernatural deities.
 
Last edited:

Ricktheheretic

"Do what thou will shall be the whole of the law"
It seems to me that when I read the Satanic Bible by Anton LaVey and I listen to Atheists on say, Youtube, there's very little difference between the philosophies.

Heck, here's this:

And this:

How many atheists believe that it is unhealthy to not feel hate towards other people?

How many atheists believe that the weak are made to suffer and that the earth belongs to the strong/intelligent?

How many atheists believe that all deities are man made? (Probably all of them.)

How many atheists believe that they are the ones that are to give their lives meaning apart from any help from others?

What's the difference?

Atheism is simply lack of belief in deity. Laveyan Satanism is a hodge-podge of Enlightenment rationalism, Medieval "Satanist" deviancy, Nietzsche, misinterpreted Aleister Crowley, Rand Objectivism and modern occultism. If I left anything out, I'm sorry. Laveyan Satanism doesn't posit a creed for living without "god" or a "higher power." Laveyan Satanism pretends to be what people would believe in if they didn't have any values from religion, i.e. selfishness, egoism. The fact is that people are not naturally selfish creatures out for their own self-satisfaction. People can be very altruistic and decent people without any religious upbringing. Of course a Laveyan Satanist could be very altruistic and decent, provided that they did nice things just because doing nice things gives self-satisfaction. I don't disagree with Satanism per se because I profess a form of Satanism that goes back further than Laveyan Satanism. Satan has always been the archetypal deviant or rebel. According to Aleister Crowley every man is his own god.

"Every man and every woman is a star. Every number is infinite; there is no difference." Liber Al Legis, The Book of the Law

"I believe in one secret and ineffable LORD; and in one Star in the Company of Stars of whose fire we are created" Creed of Ecclesia Gnostica Catholica

"I am the Snake that giveth Knowledge & Delight and bright glory, and stir the hearts of men with drunkenness. To worship me take wine and strange drugs whereof I will tell my prophet, & be drunk thereof! They shall not harm ye at all. It is a lie, this folly against self. The exposure of innocence is a lie. Be strong, o man! lust, enjoy all things of sense and rapture: fear not that any God shall deny thee for this." Liber Al Legis, The Book of the Law

I think that every man/woman/child should feel free to pursue whatever they feel is the truth and to enjoy whatever lifestyle they are comfortable with. I think that conventional religion is a lie that has far too long been accepted. People need to form creeds based on what it means to be people rather than what religions tell them. God should be seen in terms of Infinite Intelligence or Cosmic Consciousness.

“The true name of Satan, the Kabalists say, is that of Yahveh reversed; for Satan is not a black God, but the negation of God. The Devil is the personification of Atheism or Idolatry. For the Initiates, this is not a person, but a force, created for good, but which may serve for evil. It is the instrument of Liberty or free will. They represent this Force, which presides over the physical generation, under the mythologic and horned form of the God Pan; thence the he-goat of the Sabbat, brother of the Ancient Serpent, and the light bearer or Phosphor, of which the poets have made the false Lucifer of the legend”. Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma

Thelema 101 at Thelema 101 Sinagogue of SatanCouncil for Secular HumanismNational Spiritualist Association of Churches
 
Last edited:

RedDragon94

Love everyone, meditate often
Atheism is simply lack of belief in deity. Laveyan Satanism is a hodge-podge of Enlightenment rationalism, Medieval "Satanist" deviancy, Nietzsche, misinterpreted Aleister Crowley, Rand Objectivism and modern occultism. If I left anything out, I'm sorry. Laveyan Satanism doesn't posit a creed for living without "god" or a "higher power." Laveyan Satanism pretends to be what people would believe in if they didn't have any values from religion, i.e. selfishness, egoism. The fact is that people are not naturally selfish creatures out for their own self-satisfaction. People can be very altruistic and decent people without any religious upbringing. Of course a Laveyan Satanist could be very altruistic and decent, provided that they did nice things just because doing nice things gives self-satisfaction. I don't disagree with Satanism per se because I profess a form of Satanism that goes back further than Laveyan Satanism. Satan has always been the archetypal deviant or rebel. According to Aleister Crowley every man is his own god.

"Every man and every woman is a star. Every number is infinite; there is no difference." Liber Al Legis, The Book of the Law

"I believe in one secret and ineffable LORD; and in one Star in the Company of Stars of whose fire we are created" Creed of Ecclesia Gnostica Catholica

"I am the Snake that giveth Knowledge & Delight and bright glory, and stir the hearts of men with drunkenness. To worship me take wine and strange drugs whereof I will tell my prophet, & be drunk thereof! They shall not harm ye at all. It is a lie, this folly against self. The exposure of innocence is a lie. Be strong, o man! lust, enjoy all things of sense and rapture: fear not that any God shall deny thee for this." Liber Al Legis, The Book of the Law

I think that every man/woman/child should feel free to pursue whatever they feel is the truth and to enjoy whatever lifestyle they are comfortable with. I think that conventional religion is a lie that has far too long been accepted. People need to form creeds based on what it means to be people rather than what religions tell them. God should be seen in terms of Infinite Intelligence or Cosmic Consciousness.

“The true name of Satan, the Kabalists say, is that of Yahveh reversed; for Satan is not a black God, but the negation of God. The Devil is the personification of Atheism or Idolatry. For the Initiates, this is not a person, but a force, created for good, but which may serve for evil. It is the instrument of Liberty or free will. They represent this Force, which presides over the physical generation, under the mythologic and horned form of the God Pan; thence the he-goat of the Sabbat, brother of the Ancient Serpent, and the light bearer or Phosphor, of which the poets have made the false Lucifer of the legend”. Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma

Thelema 101 at Thelema 101 Sinagogue of SatanCouncil for Secular HumanismNational Spiritualist Association of Churches
Yes. Satan can be chaotic but not generally, just don't tick him off. He has the potential to live in everyone, meaning he balances positivity an negativity.
 

Ricktheheretic

"Do what thou will shall be the whole of the law"
No, real satanism isnt "philosophical", and you do have to make a "deal", pact.

Dont be fooled by meant to sell nonsense.

I don't think there is a real Satan, let alone real Satanism.

"Satanism" has been used to describe heretics since the days of the Gnostics in 2nd and 3rd centuries A.D. In Medieval times "Satanists" were religious rebels who parodied the Catholic Mass with a Satanic Black Mass. I heard something about a secret Cainite Gnostic cult who venerated the serpent as the light-bearer "Lucifer" or "Satanas," the enemy of the Gnostic Demiurge - Yahweh the fallen creator god who imprisoned spirit children from the aeon above in the causal material universe. They saw the serpent in Eden as a helper who wanted humans to know there was a reality above the material world, and what was really good and evil. They viewed the rebel Cain as the first Gnostic and first to set himself free from the yoke of Yahweh the Demiurge. They likewise revered the Sodomites, Esau, and the Witch of Endor as Gnostic saints. Some went as far as to see Judas Iscariot as the true Messiah and Jesus as the son of Yahweh the Demiurge, usually Gnostics regarded Jesus as the son the Eternal Father who was rejected by Yahweh's children i.e the Jews. The persecution of the Gnostic Cathars in the Middle Ages shows doubts about the Catholic Church's belief in their god as the sole deity.

Later Satanism was used to sell a rebellious ideology. Aleister Crowley, despite his significant occult ideology, gained infamy by presenting him self as "the beast" and "the wickedest man in the world." Anton Lavey did his own thing with Satanism, and now we have the Church of Satan and the Temple of Set started by Michael Aquino.

I included some good Gnostic links below.


Our Lady of Endor Coven - Wikipedia Our Lady of Endor Coven
Cainites - Wikipedia Cathars and Cathar Beliefs in the Languedoc The Genesis FactorThelema 101 at Thelema 101
 
Last edited:
Top