chuck010342 said:
I do admit it. There are other people who pray to other Gods but those Gods don't exsist. I believe that they have every right to believe what they believe but what they believe is not the truth. I don't believe in God blindly.
Chuck - you truly are the Prince of Irony.
chuck010342 said:
The reason I don't ask for those things is because I don't believe mankind deserves them. and FYI there will be world peace when the end times come.
Now we're getting somewhere! You don't believe that mankind
deserves them? That almost sounds as if you are playing God - as though it is your job to "filter" the needs of mankind, prior to submitting requests to God. I'm sure He's glad to get the help. You must be wise - far beyond my meager ability to comprehend. Only an incredibly bright mind could possibly see the folly in ending world hunger or asking for world peace. I bow to your keen insight.
chuck010342 said:
I am not twisting the scientific method. The scientific method = the principles and procedures for the systematic pursuit of knowledge involving the recognition and formulation of a problem, the collection of data through observation and experiment, and the formulation and testing of hypotheses
Using the cut and paste technique to insert the definition of the term "scientific method" demonstrates good computer skills, but it does not refute your misapplication (or misunderstanding) of the scientific method. As Meogi has pointed out in an earlier post - your total misuse and of all things scientific betrays you.
chuck010342 said:
I hope so. It should be interesting to watch you take a didactic slant for my benefit. I'm looking forward to the furthering of my education in logic.
Chuck - I must say that your tenacity in defending your vision of your God (and yes, there are others) is admirable. Unfortunately, you choose the wrong tools for the job. I can use a table saw to pound a screw into drywall, but a screwdriver would be much more effective. You insist on trying to use science (that you have twisted beyond recognition) to try to prove your revealed faith - and you fail miserably at it, because it is the wrong tool. The fact that you have to pervert the scientific method as badly as you do should show you the folly of your argument.
If you want people to buy into your particular view of reality, you are wasting your time using science (at least for anyone with a functioning brain). Either you do not understand science (on any level), or you are intentionally willing to ignore what it clearly shows you. My guess is the former.
TVOR