FFH said:
Dawny keeps urging us to look at this chapter.
The answers are all there, concerning tongues, just as Dawny has stated.
1 Cororinthians 14: 1-8
1- Follow after charity, and desire spiritual gifts, but rather that ye may prophesy....etc.....
33- For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all the churches of the saints.
Hmm...you stopped at verse 33...the
whole chapter deals with
tongues, here is the rest:
14:34 Let your
women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience as also saith the law.
14:35 And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church.
14:36 What? came the word of God out from you? or came it unto you only? 14:37
If any man think himself to be a prophet, or spiritual, let him acknowledge that the things that I write unto you are the commandments of the Lord.
14:38 But if any man be ignorant, let him be ignorant.
14:39 Wherefore, brethren, covet to prophesy, and forbid not to speak with tongues.
14:40 Let all things be done decently and in order.
(King James Bible, 1 Corinthians)
The next verse, in this great chapter on tongues says for women to keep silence, it is not permitted, and a shame to them to speak out in church. Now, I don't think Paul is trying to put down women, this is Holy Scripture, God's Word, "the commandment of the Lord", and in other places it talks of women not usurping authority over a man as far as in teaching men doctrine, they may teach women and children doctrine. It doesn't mean they can't have a ministry, preach the gospel, teach a sunday school class, a womans's group, evangelize, witness, get up and give their testimony, teach in school or college or be a boss at work, or anything like that. Because, what is the context? The context is rules on tongues, and here it says women should not do it in church. Hey, I did not say it, and I think women are equal to men and many these days I admire more than many men, lol, but if we go by God's Word on tongues here, it says for them not to in the church. The 2 verses right before that verse also say:
14:32 And the spirits of the prophets are subject to the prophets.
14:33 For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints.
And the last verse after those says: 14:40 Let all things be done decently and in order.
(King James Bible, 1 Corinthians)
Now, in Pentecostal services I have been to and seen, many people will speak in tongues at once, women, too, everyone praising and shouting and raising their hands, (and sometimes its kinda cool actualy, lol, and sometimes it is very not cool) but it is not exactly orderly, and the 'spirits of the prohpets aren't subject to the prophets', so much either. What I mean is people say they get 'carried away', they 'can't help it', they gotta shout and let loose with all these 'tongues' and shaking and falling out and running around and jumping up and down and all sorts of things. (some churches are 'milder' than others, but, not always) But this verse says two or at most three should speak in tongues and take turns, and there should be an interpreter. But, for most of the Praise and Worship time everyone is shouting, speaking in tongues, singing, and in some instances it can be a mad house, definetely freaks a lot of people out who first see it. Their like, man these people are nuts!, and Paul kinda said, yeah, they're gonna think you're mad, unless you speak words easy to be understood, in their language they understand, you might as well speak into the air. (He compares 5 words someone understands to 10,000 they don't) Paul was trying to teach the very carnal church at Corinth lots of stuff, and on tongues he taught, that, it was not a gift for everybody, it was the least of the gifts, it was not to be sought as the most important gifts, it was to be limited, and to be interpreted, and not done by women, and it would cease.
1. Not for everybody, the least of the gifts: Oh, but you're missing something if you don't experience it they say...its the 'baptism of the Holy Spirit, Entire Sanctification (later on those)...
12:28 And God hath set
somein the church,
first apostles,
secondarily prophets,
thirdly teachers,
after that miracles, then gifts of healings, helps, governments, diversities of
tongues. [ FINALY, tongues comes in dead last.]
12:29 Are all apostles? are all prophets? are all teachers? are all workers of miracles? 12:30 Have all the gifts of healing?
do all speak with tongues? {NO} do all interpret? 12:31 But covet earnestly the best gifts: and yet shew I unto you a more excellent way.
12:11 But all these worketh that one and the selfsame Spirit,
dividing to every man severally as he will. [We don't seek the gifts, the Holy Spirit divides to everyone individually, as HE wills.]
(King James Bible, 1 Corinthians)
2. Not to be sought and not the most important gift:
But covet earnestly the best gifts: (1st, 2nd, 3rd...) and yet shew I unto you a more excellent way.
(King James Bible, 1 Corinthians) Tongues were not to be coveted, desired, or sought, Paul said covet the BEST gifts: Paul says:
14:1 Follow after charity, and desire spiritual gifts, but
rather that ye may prophesy. [prophesy is to pro-fess, speak forth, the gospel so people get saved, edified.]
14:2 For he that speaketh in an unknown tongue...(unknown is in italics, not in the original text at all, not in any existing manuscript, it was added)
14:12 Even so ye, forasmuch as ye are zealous of spiritual gifts,
seek that ye may excel to the edifying of the church. Paul says that you are looking for spiritual gifts, but the most important thing is to look for the
edifying of the church. He finaly sums up and says tongues are to be tolerated, but not coveted or sought:
14:39 Wherefore, brethren, covet to prophesy, and forbid not to speak with tongues.
He lists it in an
orderly emphasis,
first desire to
prophesy, (again not like a prohet telling some new revelation, here it is to speak forth the Word of God, so people can understand and be saved and edified.) Then, says forbid not to speak with tongues.
3. Tongues was to be limited and interpreted:
14:27 If any man speak in an unknown tongue, let it be by two, or at the
most by three, and that
by course; and let
one interpret.
14:28 But
if there be no interpreter, let him
keep silence in the church; and let him speak to himself, and to God.
Here he says by 2 or at MOST 3, and by course, which is IN TURN, and if no one can interperet what you are saying, shush.
I believe alot of this was God's way of teaching the Corinthians before the canon was complete. Now that we have it, we're cool, we got what He needs us to know.
4. Tongues will cease: We all know that from chapter 13, that there are six gifts mentioned: prophecy, revelation, tongues, faith, hope, and love, and only three would reamain (faith, hope, and love). Not just here, but as I Corinthians was one of Paul's early epistles, exept the letters to the Thessalonians, no other epistle mentions tongues AT ALL. It appears they were on their way out even at the time. Romans is a great book on doctrine and practical living, and never mentions tongues. Ephesians is about the church and it s mystery and not once mentions tongues. Not Peter, John, or James mentioned tongues, it ceased.
John Chrysostom is one of the most well known early church fathers and in AD 400 wrote about it: "The whole passage is very obscure, but the obscurity arises from the ignorance to the facts described which, though familiar to those whom the apostle wrote, have
ceased to occur." By 400, they had ceased for so long they did not even know what the passage was talking about. No missionaries can go preach a foreign language unless they learn it first, it would be great if they just 'got the gift' all of a sudden. No great soul winners and men of the church ever sought or talked in tongues, not Luther, Calvin, Moody, Spurgeon, Sunday, Finney, , no missionaries like Carey, Taylor, or Livingstone either.
Well, kinda hodge-podge production, lol, we can go on and on about tongues, and I could go verse by verse and we all interpret it differently, and interperet things that just are not there, too. I only urge those involved in the tongues movement to objectively analyze some of the books or sites that would show Biblically and kindly the objections to it, too much to tackle at the moment....Love, God Bless...
Mike