• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

the relive a great debate debate thread

robtex

Veteran Member
Is it good to re-examine old debates on RF by digging up old threads and re-hashing issues debated months or even years ago? Why or why not?

I say it is a testable theory. Lets get those who think re-hashing old debates is a good thing to dig up an oldie but goodie and post the link on this thread for further introspection. If you can't think of one off the top of your head find a debator you admire, look at his profile under threads started and scroll through them for a winner.
 

Melody

Well-Known Member
I think it is since there is a constant influx of new people with new ideas and arguments.
 

robtex

Veteran Member
Melody said:
I think it is since there is a constant influx of new people with new ideas and arguments.

can you give an example of a thread you saw as a great debate from the past?
 

egroen

Member
Just start a new thread with your new viewpoints and if necessary or beneficial, link to the old thread. It is too overwhelming to read ten-plus pages of an old thread.

-Erin
 

kevmicsmi

Well-Known Member
I seem to remember a great thread in which AE took the position that Judges who "Legislate from the bench" should not be appointed to the supreme court.
 
A

angellous_evangellous

Guest
kevmicsmi said:
I seem to remember a great thread in which AE took the position that Judges who "Legislate from the bench" should not be appointed to the supreme court.

you're remembering that incorrectly kev.... :rolleyes:
 
Top