sovietchild
Well-Known Member
Superstitions. You mean like believing in fire people and omnipotent magical beings?
Ya. What's wrong with them indeed.
So, what are those questions you asking then? fire people? and magical beings?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Superstitions. You mean like believing in fire people and omnipotent magical beings?
Ya. What's wrong with them indeed.
They are not rational, sort of like many theists who pretend that they are being rational.What is wrong with those people who believe in superstitions?
Djin and allah of course.So, what are those questions you asking then? fire people? and magical beings?
2. If you spend a lot of time on a cure, you tend to believe that it works, even if it doesn't. It's the sunk cost fallacy, and we all tend to fall for it. And then people don't do the stuff that actually works, and then they die.
Let's define superstition: A superstition is belief in a supernatural entity, rule or event which does not really exist.
The question is whether having NO superstitions is more useful than having superstitions. I would maintain that it is, for the following reason:
If you have one superstition, you necessarily accept an unfalsifiable hypothesis.
Why would you refute it unless it's causing harm to someone else or oneself?Once you do that, you have no reason to refute any number of other unfalsifiable hypotheses.
True. I believe in spirits but I dont believe in an entity. I believe in salt in corners and horse shoes but if someone said killing a chicken will rid me off my sins, I'd look at them funny. It depends. I don't see how they contradict each other. Maybe odd that one person believes in X god but not in Y when they are both supernatural; but, to us it's like one person liking chocolate and the other vanilla. It's a part of life. Not supernatural.So now you have a dilemma at your hands: Either you accept them all, which is impossible because some will contradict each other (and some are just... too woowoo even for the most fervent believer), or you reject some without any reason.
So you have to be inconsistent.
A consistent worldview in general is more useful than an inconsistent one, because it has a higher chance to adequately describe reality.
Well, superstitions aren't meant to be "medical cures". Most are attach to religion so they help with the spirit, mind, and thus body cope with life. The "practical" things like medicine and all of that isn't obsolete. It just means we look not only at what we can see but what we cant as well.So superstitions always lead to a worldview that is less useful than one without superstitions.
It does make sense to them, and it is not *morally* wrong. But it is not the most useful way, except perhaps for strong social pressure (it is better to believe in Jesus if you're a european in the middle ages).
Because some others are trolling.If you are promoting Satan on this forum then why do you accuse others of trolling?
Because some others are trolling.
Not if it's funny.Is trolling bad?
Your profile does not provide that answer. It's a relatively simple one; do you believe in signs from your god?Did you forget to look into my profile?
Your profile does not provide that answer. It's a relatively simple one; do you believe in signs from your god?
Omen.“It is He who sends down water from the sky And by it He makes crops grow for you and olives and dates and grapes and fruit of every kind. Therein is certainly a sign in that for people who reflect.
Omen.He has made the night and the day subservient to you, and the sun, the moon and the stars, all subject to His command. Therein are certainly signs in that for people who use their intellect.
Omen.And also, the things of varying colors He has created for you in the earth. There is certainly a sign in that for people who pay heed.
What's wrong with all the people seeing omens and superstitions?
"Prophet Muhammad clarified that there was no concept of ill omens in Islam and that belief in ill omens would lead individuals to polytheism (shirk)."What is wrong with those people who believe in superstitions?
A very large number of people strongly believe in the bad luck that comes after breaking a mirror, encountering a black cat, choosing the numbers or pointing a finger at the rainbow.
Some people believe that passing below a ladder can bring bad luck, others believe that four leaved clovers can bring good luck while a third group believe that carrying a rabbit's foot can bring good luck.
The Prophet Muhammad clarified that there was no concept of ill omens in Islam and that belief in ill omens would lead individuals to polytheism (shirk). He stated that the cry of a bird or the way it flew could not be interpreted as ill omens, and he advised that unusual objects and events be interpreted in a positive way. He also mentioned that casting spells or carrying amulets would harm the belief in tawhid (the Unity of God).
"What's wrong with all the people seeing omens and superstitions? Look inward."Omen.
Omen.
Omen.
Any time your holy book has employed the use of prophecy, that too is an omen.
What's wrong with all the people seeing omens and superstitions? Look inward.
"What's wrong with all the people seeing omens and superstitions? Look inward."
They neither look inwardly nor outwardly correctly. Please
Regards
Neither Revelation supports superstition nor science, inwardly or outwardly.Elaborate.
Revelation = superstitionNeither Revelation supports superstition nor science, inwardly or outwardly.
Regards
In all my years I've never seen produced a meaningful distinction between religious faith and superstition. In this, there isn't even much wiggle room for the usual doublespeak and language games used to distract from other 'hard' questions(problem of evil etc).Revelation = superstition