Mark 13:10 And the gospel must first be published among all nations.
Plus he clearly explains how the false teachers will come, soon after he leaves.... So think he prophesied the deception of the New Testament precisely, as do the prophets.
Doesn't say Jews, it refers to anyone who would be persecuted for his name sake....
The Jews have been persecuted for rejecting God's laws and messengers; according to the prophets.
Seriously, and you want to explain the prophets to me as you're a child of Israel?
The Christians have all been led astray on purpose by Paul, John, and Simon the stone (petros), as declared by the prophets; they don't follow Yeshua currently, thus why would they listen to him?
This is the whole point, people don't follow the Law, they claim to follow a book; yet they don't care what the book says, they care about mankind's interpretations of what is required, without questioning....
Thus if they questioned Moses, they would see Christianity defiles the law in every way on purpose; if they questioned Yeshua's teachings, they would see how he fulfills pre-Messianic prophecy, yet people don't, they want to be told how to think.....
So the point in Luke is, even if someone came back from the dead, and reexplained it, people wouldn't listen, as they already show they don't.
lol, Ecclesiastes is made up rubbish; it doesn't come from Solomon, and has so many errors in it compared to the rest of the Tanakh.
Nope, completely the other way around; Paul literally states Israel isn't divorced in detail, and Yeshua literally says Zechariah 11 is the bill of divorce.
Yeshua's name mean salvation, and was sent to the Jews....John isn't wrong on that...
It is just 'salvation doesn't come from the Jews', as they can't even teach the Law when God makes up a false religion for them to educate.
Didn't say Simon did write Acts, was explaining that all the later church John, Simon and Paul didn't teach replacement theology, and how you're completely wrong, it was Yeshua who taught it.
Think you're missing whom you're speaking to, completely aware Christianity is false, that is meant to happen; our topic was replacement theology.
It isn't exactly 'replacement' theology, that was the whole point in that dissection; Paul leaves Israel as a chosen people, whereas prophetically i would say they're no longer anything.
Yet clearly you don't even understand Paul in what you've just put, Paul
claims circumcision is now of the heart, quoting from Jeremiah, and that the spilled blood is replaced by the blood of jesus.
The covenant was clearly broken or it is saying God was a liar, when he said he would protect you in the land?
Clearly the covenant was broken before the 2nd temple destruction, and the diaspora took place....Which exactly aligns with prophecy, what Yeshua stated, and the historical facts.
