It is in conflict with most of religions. The second observation, which can be made of the preceding view, is, that how it suits together with different religions. For if it is thought that all religions are one and that they thoroughly represent the same matter, so why they however differ so much from each other? Why they teach about the basic matters, such as the number of gods and the way of salvation in a different way, if they really come from the same source?
Opposites or differences can be seen at least in the next matters. These opposites and differences also exclude each other, and they cant be in any way simultaneously in force, even though else would be claimed - or then we should also see round squares and triangles and other peculiarities. It is impossible and rejection of logic, if it is tried to fit together the next matters:
- Either salvation is by mercy (the work of Jesus for us) or by acts (the most common comprehension in religions), but not by both simultaneously.
- When in Buddhism and Confucianism there are not any God (However later Buddhism started to adore himself Buddha), for example Islam, Judaism and Christianity teach existence of one God. These views can't be simultaneously in force. On the other hand, if there is no God such as for example in Buddhism is believed, how these kinds of ways teach can even take onto the peak to the same God?
- The view of life after death changes, so that for example in Buddhism and also in other religions is believed in heaven and hell, while in Hinduism people dont believe in them. These views are opposites, and it is impossible, that these same matters are not, and are, simultaneously existing.
- Reincarnation (Hinduism, Buddhism) and non-reincarnation (Islam, Judaism, Christianity etc. ) can't be simultaneously in force.