• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Yajurveda 15:13 “learn that part of the Veda which deals with the Unity of God” ONENESS Of G-d

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
Which part of the Veda elaborates the above concept most? Please
Thread open for everybody of religion or no-religion, please.

Regards
 

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
Yajurveda Chapter 15: Verse 13 reads:

13. O woman, Just as North is self luminous, so is thy husband.
The beautiful airs are the presiding forces of the North.
May thy husband worthy of praise like the moon that preserves
rays in twenty one ways, live with thee on this earth.
Being free from the sway of passions, may he, for thee, learn that
part of the veda which deals with the unity of God. For stability, may
he study that portion of the Sama Veda, that deals with the universal
aspect of God. In thy body there are many chief strong vital airs, in
the organs, coupled with perception. He is the sustainer and lord of
those airs.
May all the learned persons, with one mind make thee renowned,
and establish thee and thy husband in a happy place on a comfortable
part of the earth.
https://archive.org/stream/yajurveda029670mbp/yajurveda029670mbp_djvu.txt
Please
Regards
 

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
Which part of the Veda elaborates the above concept most?
Thread open for everybody of religion or no-religion.
Many. But I have seen many start their ritual with 'Hiranyagarbha Sukta' (literally 'the Golden Womb'):

"Hiraṇyagharbhaḥ samavartatāgre bhūtasya jātaḥ patirekāsīt l
sa dādhāra pṛithivīṃ dyāmutemāṃ kasmai devāya haviṣā vidhema ll"
http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/rigveda/rv10121.htm

In the beginning rose Hiranyagarbha, born Only Lord of all created beings.
He fixed and holdeth up this earth and heaven. What God shall we adore with our oblation?
 
Last edited:

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
Many. But I have seen many start their ritual with 'Hiranyagarbha Sukta' (literally 'the Golden Womb'):
"Hiraṇyagharbhaḥ samavartatāgre bhūtasya jātaḥ patirekāsīt l
sa dādhāra pṛithivīṃ dyāmutemāṃ kasmai devāya haviṣā vidhema ll"
http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/rigveda/rv10121.htm
In the beginning rose Hiranyagarbha, born Only Lord of all created beings.
He fixed and holdeth up this earth and heaven. What God shall we adore with our oblation?
Please quote one and give reference for others. Right?
Regards
 

Vinayaka

devotee
Premium Member
I view any translation as neither correct nor incorrect. It is just a translation. Is a house correct or incorrect? No, it is just a collection of reassembled compounds of the earth. Correct/incorrect is in the realm of good/bad or right/wrong duality.
 

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
Give the original ancient Sanskrit translations please...
And not the mistranslations of English.
I don't get one exactly. Veda in original is supposed to be in Sanskrit, so why should it be translated in Sanskrit again? I think one means ancient interpretations of Vedas in Sanskrit that might have been mixed with the original, later. Is that what one means? Please
Regards
 

Subhankar Zac

Hare Krishna,Hare Krishna,
I don't get one exactly. Veda in original is supposed to be in Sanskrit, so why should it be translated in Sanskrit again? I think one means ancient interpretations of Vedas in Sanskrit that might have been mixed with the original, later. Is that what one means? Please
Regards

You might need an English teacher.
 

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
Give the original ancient Sanskrit translations please...
And not the mistranslations of English.
I don't get one exactly. Veda in original is supposed to be in Sanskrit, so why should it be translated in Sanskrit again? I think one means ancient interpretations of Vedas in Sanskrit that might have been mixed with the original, later. Is that what one means? Please
Regards
You might need an English teacher.
Sorry, If I wrongly understood your post.
Kindly be my English teacher, please.
English Lexicon tells me:
translation (n.)
mid-14c., "removal of a saint's body or relics to a new place," also "rendering of a text from one language to another," from Old French translacion"translation" of text, also of the bones of a saint, etc. (12c.) or directly from Latin translationem (nominative translatio) "a carrying across, removal, transporting; transfer of meaning," noun of action from past participle stem of transferre (see transfer (v.)).
http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=translation

Anybody, please.
Regards
 

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
"Unity of God” ONENESS Of G-d
There is no match of "Unity of God" or ONENESS of G-d as mentioned in Quran is Surah


The Holy Quran : Chapter 112: Al-Ikhlas الإخلاص

[112:1] In the name of Allah, the Gracious, the Merciful.
[112:2] Say, ‘He is Allah, the One;
[112:3] ‘Allah, the Independent and Besought of all.
[112:4] ‘He begets not, nor is He begotten;
[112:5] ‘And there is none like unto Him.’
http://www.alislam.org/quran/search2/showChapter.php?ch=112

Yajurveda Chapter 18 Verse 26

Nevertheless the attributes mentioned in the Vedas as below:
26. God is the Creator of the whole universe, full of knowledge.
Ubiquitous Sustainer, Maker, Seer, and foremost of all. He is known
as the Incomparable One. In Him the souls controlling the seven rishis
live in enjoyment according to their desire. He fulfils their lofty
ambition?
https://archive.org/stream/yajurveda029670mbp/yajurveda029670mbp_djvu.txt.
are appreciated by a Muslim.
Regards
 

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
Many. But I have seen many start their ritual with 'Hiranyagarbha Sukta' (literally 'the Golden Womb'):
"Hiraṇyagharbhaḥ samavartatāgre bhūtasya jātaḥ patirekāsīt l
sa dādhāra pṛithivīṃ dyāmutemāṃ kasmai devāya haviṣā vidhema ll"
http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/rigveda/rv10121.htm
In the beginning rose Hiranyagarbha, born Only Lord of all created beings.
He fixed and holdeth up this earth and heaven. What God shall we adore with our oblation?
Thank your for the information. After Yajurveda I will read Rigveda, InshaAllah/Brahman-willing.
Regards
 

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
Give the original ancient Sanskrit translations please...
And not the mistranslations of English.
Can't you access the Sanskrit original text of Veda yourself? Please quote it and give the translation yourself. It is your own Dharma. Right? Please
Regards
 
Last edited:

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
I view any translation as neither correct nor incorrect. It is just a translation. Is a house correct or incorrect? No, it is just a collection of reassembled compounds of the earth. Correct/incorrect is in the realm of good/bad or right/wrong duality.
The original Veda in Sanskrit is also a collection of words. Is not one sure about its being correct or incorrect, right or wrong? Yajurveda does provide to distinctively know right from wrong. Right? Pleas
Regards
 

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
The original Veda in Sanskrit is also a collection of words. Is not one sure about its being correct or incorrect, right or wrong? Yajurveda does provide to distinctively know right from wrong. Right?
I know. In your case one God, One book, one messenger dominates your life. It is not like that in Hinduism. We have thousands of Gods and Goddesses, thousands of books and thousands of views. A Hindu will accept what seems to be right to him. In my view, one God, one book, one messenger is a fossil. And you are seeing the effect of that in the Muslim world. No country is at peace, right from Nigeria to Indonesia. Not one day goes without report of killings. We have awarded life imprisonment to six Muslim terrorists today, 30 killed in Aleppo, 100 arrested from Ankara hospital, US air-strikes in Sirte, Libya.
 
Last edited:

Vinayaka

devotee
Premium Member
The original Veda in Sanskrit is also a collection of words. Is not one sure about its being correct or incorrect, right or wrong? Yajurveda does provide to distinctively know right from wrong. Right? Pleas
Regards
Probably, hidden in the Vedas somewhere, but they're not primarily moral code books.
 

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
Paarsurrey, here Verse 34 of Chapter XXXIV of White (Shukla) YajurVeda, as translated by Ralph Griffith at http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/wyv/wyvbk34.htm:
See, how many Gods are mentioned in just one verse. Eleven Gods in one verse! And there are many more. So, do not tell as about one Supreme God.

34. Agni (1) at dawn, and Indra (2) we invoke at dawn, and Varuna (3) and Mitra (4) and the Asvins twain (5 and 6),
Bhaga (7) at dawn, Pûshan (8) and Brahmanaspati (9), Soma (10) at dawn, Rudra (11) may we invoke at dawn. :D
 

Muffled

Jesus in me
Brahman does not will anything. It has no desire for anything. It is uninvolved. Brahman is not a God who wants people to worship him or be his servants. I would prefer if you read Upanishads first.

I believe the Upanishads are merely human wisdom and sometimes not correct.
 
Top