• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Worship of Shiva/Rudra

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
DevelopmentofShaivism.jpg

Especially for comments by Vinayaka.
 

Terese

Mangalam Pundarikakshah
Staff member
Premium Member
What is non-puranic Saivism? I mean what does it contain?
 

Shantanu

Well-Known Member
I personally think that Shiva is that tamasic deity for worship accordingly. Is there any evidence for this from the earlier versions of Saivism?
 

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
What is non-puranic Saivism? I mean what does it contain?
I suppose Shaiva philosophies and not Shiva worship in as mentioned in Shaiva puranas (Shiva Purana, Linga Purana, Skanda Purana, Varaha Purana, Vāmana Purana, Kūrma Purana, Matsya Purana, Mārkandeya Purana, Bhavishya Purana, Brahmānda Purana) like the Vaishnavas worship Vishnu or Krishna as mentioned in Vaishnava puranas (Vishnu Purana, Bhagavata Purana, Nāradeya Purana, Garuda Purana, Vayu Purana, Varaha Purana). Worship and not philosophize. Well, some one can say that there is no worship without philosophy.
 
Last edited:

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
Goal depends on what a person believes. If one takes Shiva to be a personal God, then deliverance through his grace. If one takes Shiva as the constituting principle of the universe (Brahman), then strengthening and realizing this non-duality.

If I were to make the chart, I would have this in the beginning:
 

Attachments

  • Shiva worship.jpg
    Shiva worship.jpg
    15.6 KB · Views: 111

Kapalika

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
I've heard, some in the past, say that that graphic is not totally accurate. But I've never had the expertise or knowledge to know either way. Does anyone have any insight on this?
 

Jainarayan

ॐ नमो भगवते वासुदेवाय
Staff member
Premium Member
Shiva was created by Vaishnavas due to sectarian rivalry

I never understood that sort of thing. :confused: I'd go to Shiva abhishekham as easily as I'll go to a Sudarsana abhishekam. I see people at the temple going from sanctum to sanctum of Vishnu, Shiva and Devi. Unless you really knew, you couldn't tell by what puja they attended what their sect was.
 

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
Yes, that is right, Terese. Both Lord Vishnu and Lord Shiva do not hesitate to remove asuras. Both will protect and nurture righteous people. Both are abodes of 'ananda' and so are the Mothers, whether you consider them one or many. So where is the difference?
 

Kapalika

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
What is non-puranic Saivism? I mean what does it contain?

Stuff like the Aghori, Kapalikas, Kaula, Vamachara and others. Well, at least on the more extreme end. Less extreme is other Tantras and other stuff ect.

edit: Vamachara isn't shaivite but a shaivite can practice vamachara, which would make them non puranic.

ShaivismHistoryMap.JPG
 

Vinayaka

devotee
Premium Member
In the grand scheme, the history doesn't really matter. What matters is what we are today. Will looking a lineages help one realise the self, develop character, or find bliss? Let the historians have at it if they wish. Basically though, its rather easy to distinguish between a Puranic Saivite, and a non-Puranic one. The Puranic one focuses mostly on Shiv-ji the anthropomorphised God with a blue throat, a wife, and one or two children. The non-Puranic Saivite will focus on Nataraja, the Lingam, or even Ardhinarisvara. In my experience, quite differing approaches. Besides the focus, the importance of the Puranas themselves goes fro very important, to insignificant.
 
Last edited:

Sumit

Sanatana Dharma
Absolutely not. The idea of a Tamasic Shiva was created by Vaishnavas due to sectarian rivalry and has no significance outside Vaishnavism.
No, it wasn't, the tamasic form of shiva has been worshipped since ancient times and is not invented by Vaishnavas or any other hindu sect.
 

निताइ dasa

Nitai's servant's servant
Evidence?


There is alot of evidence in the puranas about this categorization of sattvic, rajasic and tamasic deities. I've seen verses from Padma Purana, Garuda Purana, Skanda Purana and also Matsya Purana on this actually. Bhagavatam is very clear that Lord Shiva is a deity of tamo guna, and Bhagavtam is one of those puranas that has not been interpolated (all 18000 32 syllable verses are still with us, thanks to Sridhara Svami's commentary). Of course opponents will say they are all interpolations, but I beg to differ.

It is the interpretation of tamo guna that is a controversy. I've heardshaivites say that tamo guna refers to the destructive properties of Lord Shiva.
 
Top